MICHIGANISTAN…well on its way to becoming the first Islamic sharia-compliant state in America

Dearbornistan Heights Police Department now providing halal food to detained Muslims.

 Arab American News  Local Muslim sharia proponents have welcomed the Dearborn Heights Police Department’s recent decision to provide halal food to Muslims who are detained in their custody.  In recent months, members of the terror-linked CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations of Michigan) have held meetings with the Dearborn Heights mayor and police chief to discuss the need for the City’s police force to better accommodate Muslim suspects and criminals. These meetings have led to the recent halal food accommodation. CAIR-MI is also seeking similar accommodations from other law enforcement entities in Michigan and says the Police Department’s decision is a testament to recognizing the religious sensitivities of Muslims.  

Michigan Police: Muslim female detainees can wear headbags in jail.

Detroit News  After meeting this week with officials from the Council on American-Islamic Relations of Michigan, the Novi Police Department has agreed to allow Muslim women to wear the traditional hijab [...] covering during detainment.

“We welcome the sensitivity shown by the Novi Police Department and look forward to working with them in the future, which will include providing sensitivity trainings,” CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid said in a statement.

Satan is trying to take over America with his fake “religion”, because America and Israel have been (until the Muslim King Obama came into rule) very good allies, looking out for each other. This makes satan upset for he will lose in the end times, and the Islamic AC will be exited out of the picture.

I went off on the rabbit trail just to let you know that, with the Biblical “End Times” quickly approaching, Christians, and Christian oriented countries, will start to be more persecuted and pressured into converting to Islam.

U.S. steps up hunt for editor of al-Qaeda online magazine after details emerged Boston bombers followed the digital publication’s bomb-making recipes

By Daily Mail Reporter

PUBLISHED: 22:56 EST, 29 April 2013 | UPDATED: 17:59 EST, 30 April 2013

The hunt is on.

U.S. authorities are stepping up their efforts to track down the editor of a digital magazine published by Al Qaeda after details emerged that the surviving Boston bomber told investigators he and his brother learned how to build explosives by reading the online publication.

The CIA is believed to be spearheading the effort to find Yahya Ibrahim, a jihadist who has edited ‘Inspire’ since its founding editor-in-chief was killed by a U.S. drone strike in Yemen in 2011, the Daily Telegraph in London reports.

Fodder: U.S. officials say ‘Inspire’ has served as a viable resource for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, his late brother Tamerlan, and other terrorists before them

U.S. officials say that ‘Inspire’ has served as a viable resource for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, his late brother Tamerlan, and other terrorists before them.

‘Inspire clearly is a powerful propaganda tool,’ an unnamed CIA source told the Telegraph saying that officials were concerned about the online magazine’s ability to push ‘potential jihadists to conduct violent action.’

Ibrahim, who publishes his articles and editorial letters in English, is believed to be a war-themed pen name for a propagandist tied to the Yemen-based Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, according to the Telegraph.

Propagandist: Ibrahim, who publishes his articles and editorial letters in English, is believed to be a war-themed pen name for a propagandist tied to the Yemen-based Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula

Scott Stewart, a former State Department special agent who now works for the global intelligence company Stratfor, told the newspaper that he suspects Ibrahim may have similar fundamentalist roots to the digital publication’s founder Samir Khan.
Khan was killed in the same drone attack that took out radical American and Yemini cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in September 2011.

‘Yahya Ibrahim is a distinct individual,’ Stewart, who has analysed ‘Inspire’, said. ‘His presence has been there since issue one, and he speaks in a distinct voice. He is obviously very proficient in English, and it would not be surprising if he were someone, like Khan, from an immigrant family to the U.S.’
Michael Leiter, a former National Counterterrorism Center director, said that U.S. officials will consider prosecuting Ibrahim and other editors for giving material support to terrorists.

Food for hatred: Michael Leiter, a former National Counterterrorism Centre director, said that U.S. officials will consider prosecuting Ibrahim and other editors for giving material support to terrorists

posted on 3 May 13 by Daily Mail Online

Hijab for a day: Non-Muslim women who try the headscarf

By Catrin Nye BBC Asian Network

Jess Rhodes, with and without her hijab

World Hijab Day calls on non-Muslim women to try out life under the traditional head scarf. Can it lead to more religious tolerance and understanding?

“Because I’m not very skilled I’m wearing what you could call a one-piece hijab – you just pull it over your head. But I’ve discovered the scope is endless. There are all sorts of options.”

So says Jess Rhodes, 21, a student from Norwich in the UK. She had always wanted to try a headscarf but, as a non-Muslim, didn’t think it an option. So, when given the opportunity by a friend to try wearing the scarf, she took it.

“She assured me that I didn’t need to be Muslim, that it was just about modesty, although obviously linked to Islam, so I thought, ‘why not?’”

Rhodes is one of hundreds of non-Muslims who will be wearing the headscarf as part of the first annual World Hijab Day on 1 February.

Originated by New York woman Nazma Khan, the movement has been organised almost solely over social networking sites. It has attracted interest from Muslims and non-Muslims in more than 50 countries across the world.

For many people, the hijab is a symbol of oppression and divisiveness. It’s a visible target that often bears the brunt of a larger debate about Islam in the West.

World Hijab Day is designed to counteract these controversies. It encourages non-Muslim women (or even Muslim women who do not ordinarily wear one) to don the hijab and experience what it’s like to do so, as part of a bid to foster better understanding.

“Growing up in the Bronx, in NYC, I experienced a great deal of discrimination due to my hijab,” says organiser Khan, who moved to New York from Bangladesh aged 11. She was the only “hijabi” (a word for someone who wears the headscarf) in her school.

“In middle school I was ‘Batman’ or ‘ninja,’” she says.

“When I moved on to college it was just after 9/11, so they would call me Osama Bin Laden or terrorist. It was awful.

“I figured the only way to end discrimination if we ask our fellow sisters to experience hijab themselves”
Nazma Khan World Hijab day founder

Khan had no idea the concept would result in support from all over the world. She says she has been contacted by people in dozens of countries, including the UK, Australia, India, Pakistan, France and Germany. The group’s literature has been translated into 22 languages.

It was social networking that got Jess Rhodes involved. Her friend Widyan Al Ubudy lives in Australia and asked her Facebook friends to participate.

“My parents, their natural reaction was to wonder if this was a good idea,” says Rhodes, who decided to wear her hijab for a month.

“They were worried I would be attacked in the street because of a lack of tolerance.”

Rhodes herself was concerned about the reaction, but after eight days of wearing the headscarf she has actually been surprised by how positive it has been.

Muslim headscarves

The word hijab comes from the Arabic for veil and is used to describe the headscarves worn by Muslim women. These scarves come in myriad styles and colours. The type most commonly worn in the West is a square scarf that covers the head and neck but leaves the face clear.

The niqab is a veil for the face that leaves the area around the eyes clear. However, it may be worn with a separate eye veil. It is worn with an accompanying headscarf.

The burka is the most concealing of all Islamic veils. It covers the entire face and body, leaving just a mesh screen to see through

The al-amira is a two-piece veil. It consists of a close fitting cap, usually made from cotton or polyester, and an accompanying tube-like scarf.

The shayla is a long, rectangular scarf popular in the Gulf region. It is wrapped around the head and tucked or pinned in place at the shoulders.

The khimar is a long, cape-like veil that hangs down to just above the waist. It covers the hair, neck and shoulders completely, but leaves the face clear.

The chador, worn by many Iranian women when outside the house, is a full-body cloak. It is often accompanied by a smaller headscarf underneath.

“I can’t explain it really but people have been really very helpful, especially in shops,” she says.

Esther Dale, 28, lives in the US state of California and is another non-Muslim trying out the headscarf for the day. The mother-of-three was told about the event by a friend of hers who is a “hijabi”.

As a practising Mormon, Dale understands the importance of faith in daily life, and the judgment that can come with the associated clothing.

She says she knows the stigma that surround the headscarf and hopes this is an opportunity to help combat that. (Too bad the true God, Yahveh, warns the people not to follow after any false religion)

“I knew that it’s about modesty of behaviour, not just clothing, and that it’s a faulty assumption that women only wear it if they’re forced to – especially in the US. That’s not at all the truth,” she says.

“It’s a good chance to educate people that you can’t make an accurate judgment about someone based solely on what they’re wearing,” says Dale.

The hijab has been a frequent target of criticism from people like Maryam Namazie, a vocal ex-Muslim and campaigner, who sees the garment as a form of oppression.

Hijabs on display at a market. The term comes from the Arabic word for ‘veil’ or ‘screen’

“Millions of women and girls have been harassed, fined, intimidated and arrested for ‘improper’ veiling over the past several decades,” she wrote in a blog post about the Iranian women’s football team’s hijabs.

“Anyone who has ever taken an Iran Air flight will verify how quickly veils are removed the minute the airplane leaves Iranian airspace.

“And anyone who knows anything about Iran knows the long and hard struggle that has taken place against compulsory veiling and sex apartheid.”

Organisers of this event say they were fed up with seeing the words “oppressed” or “subjugated” when it came to discussing the Muslim head-covering.

They reject the notion that women only wear hijabs at the insistence of a father or a radical member of the family.

This day, then, is about showing the world that women can choose the hijab willingly.

Rhodes says it’s a choice she will continue to make.

“I will wear it from time to time,” she says of her hijab. “I’m saying to the world, my beauty is for my family and my partner. Any woman can wear this.”

Posted on 31 Jan 13 by BBC News Magazine

[Editor’s Note: This shows that the Biblical anti-Christ spirit is taking over the West already. Pure Dhimmitude. Now the Qur’an and Hadiths and the Sira tells Muslims not to befriend Infidels (non-Muslims), not do to anything with infidels (non-Muslims) because it is against the “peaceful” and “tolerant” god allah (satan himself), unless they think they can “show them the way to allah” (convert them to Islam)…in infidel terms, this is actually called coercion.

Now, with the West participating in the "Hijab for a Day" event, so infidels can see what its like to wear one…and with Jess Rhodes’ testimony that “after eight days of wearing the headscarf she has actually been surprised by how positive it has been”, shows that Western countries have, to a point, submitted to Islam by showing them (by wearing or allowing women to wear the allah commanded “modesty garb”) a scared attitude, and basically allowing Muslims to do whatever they want because of this true fact…Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims, and the Western population is afraid of the 25% (at least through polls) of the Islamic population that will pull violent jihad.]

#MyJihad Lies Exposed: The Real Meaning of Jihad, from Islamic Sources

Reblogged from Creeping Sharia:

• 

via #MyJihad Lies Exposed: The Real Meaning of Jihad, from Islamic Sources - Atlas Shrugs.

The Meaning of Jihad By Kamala
January 11, 2013

CAIR's Ahmed Rehab describes their #MyJihad ads this way: "The campaign is about reclaiming Islam, and not just ‘jihad,’ from both Muslim and non-Muslim extremists... Whether it’s the bin Ladens and the al-Qaidas of the Muslim world, or the Pam Gellers and Frank Gaffneys of the non-Muslim world, ironically — even though they come from the two opposite ends of the spectrum — they agree exactly on the same definition of ‘jihad’ and on the same worldview of Islam versus the rest of the world.”

Read more… 309 more words

The real truth behind jihad...yes the Qur'an tells them the major jihad is internal, but the big, most prevalent one is purge the world of infidels, Jews and kafirs...

4 Out of 5 US Ambassadors Killed in Line of Duty Were Slain by Muslims

Reblogged from Creeping Sharia:

Muslims are working hard to add another to their list.

Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Penninsula (AQAP) has offered a reward of $160,000 in gold for the death of America's ambassador to Yemen or any US soldier stationed in the country.

Daniel Greenfield, who has been on a mission lately, writes that 4 Out of 5 US Ambassadors Killed in the Line of Duty Were Slain by Muslims…

Read more… 224 more words

Hhmm, and our "Christian" President keeps giving Muslim countries billions of our dollars because he like their prayer chants, maybe it's paying for the death of Americans.

Muslim Brotherhood ‘paying gangs to go out and rape women and beat men protesting in Egypt’ as thousands of demonstrators pour on to the streets

• Activists claim there have been nearly 20 attacks in the last 10 days
• Country has seen rise in mob sex attacks on protestors in the last year
• Demonstrators in Tahrir Square yesterday protested against a draft constitution approved by allies of President Morsi
• Muslim Brotherhood today marched in support of the president

By Ruth Whitehead

PUBLISHED: 07:37 EST, 1 December 2012 |

Egypt’s ruling party is paying gangs of thugs to sexually assault women protesting in Cairo’s Tahrir Square against President Mohamed Morsi, activists said.

They also said the Muslim Brotherhood is paying gangs to beat up men who are taking part in the latest round of protests, which followed a decree by President Morsi to give himself sweeping new powers.

It comes as the Muslim Brotherhood coordinated a demonstration today in support of President Mohamed Morsi, who is rushing through a constitution to try to defuse opposition fury over his newly expanded powers.

Danger: women protesting in Cairo’s Tahrir Square face the increased danger of sexual assault by large gangs of men

Egyptian supporters of Muslim Brotherhood taking part in a demonstration near Cairo University, in Cairo, in support of President Mohamed Morsi’s recent constitutional declaration

Just 24 hours earlier around 200,000 people gathered in Tahrir Square, the heart of last year’s revolution which toppled President Hosni Mubarak, yesterday to protest against a new draft constitution.

Large marches from around Cairo flowed into the square, chanting ‘Constitution: Void!’ and The people want to bring down the regime.’

Posted on 1 Dec 12 by dailymail.co.uk

“PROPHET MUHAMMAD: MONSTER OF HISTORY”

FIRST MUSLIM SAVAGE

THE TEACHINGS OF THE KORAN ARE THE TEACHINGS OF A PSYCHOTIC AND THAT PSYCHOTIC IS PROPHET MUHAMMAD: MURDERER, TERRORIST, TORTURER, RAPIST, CHILD MOLESTER

READ BELOW TO DOWNLOAD MORE BOOKS                                                            

                      BANALITY OF EVIL: BANALITY OF SILENCE

                      ABSOLUTE POWER CREATES ABSOLUTE EVIL

                      THERE CAN BE NO LIFE WITHOUT LIBERTY AND NO LIBERTY WITHOUT LIFE

IF YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM THEN YOU DON’T DESERVE TO BE A FREE PEOPLE. FREEDOM IS NOT ONLY A RIGHT- IT IS A RESPONSIBILITY THAT MUST BE DEFENDED FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.

                          FOR FREE 596/990 PAGE PDF BOOKS islamreform.net

                         “The time will come when anyone who kills you will think that by doing this he is serving God.” (John 16:2)                         

                             THE MESSAGE OF THESE BOOKS IS: DESTROY THE QUR’AN OR BE DESTROYED BY IT

WHAT IS ISLAM: A BROAD OVERVIEW

YOUR DEMOCRATIC OBLIGATION AS A KAFIR

All kafirs (non-Muslims) living in a democratic society have an obligation as free citizens to understand what Islam truly is and the very grave danger this evil ideology poses to ALL freedom loving peoples everywhere.   In this website, the true reality of Islam is exposed devoid of all the political correctness behind which Muslims are seeking to criminalize all criticism of Islam employing labels such as Islamophobia, racism, hate, intolerance, to destroy anyone who dares to expose by quoting from the Koran and the Hadiths in Islam’s OWN WORDS, OWN WRITINGS the hateful, evil, teachings of Islam.  There will be repetition in this website as this evil is exposed and the most important Islamic beliefs are emphasized.

BASICS

All Muslims believe that there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his last prophet. Islam demands that Muslims follow the Koran (the timeless, divine, eternal, word of God) and the perfect pattern of Muhammad’s words and deeds (his Sunna). The Sunna is found in the Hadith (Traditions of Muhammad) and the Sira (Muhammad’s biography). These three texts, are the Islamic Trilogy.

The doctrine is political and religious.  Islam is contained in these three books. It is very simple–three books–a Trilogy. To know Islam, read the Koran, Sira and Hadith.

Islamic doctrine says that moderation consists of patterning your life after Muhammad’s perfect example and living by the Koran. By this standard of moderation, Osama bin Laden is a true, moderate Muslim – a holy man of the book – who is following exactly the teachings of Islam as recorded in the Koran and the example of Muhammad, the warrior jihadist.  A jihadist is a moderate Muslim.

Islam is a process, not just a name. Both the Koran and the Sira, Muhammad’s life, show a process of starting off with civility, then demanding and next moving to violence as Islam grows stronger.  This process is the Islamification of society.

Muhammad preached the religion of Islam in Mecca for 13 years and gained 150 followers. He went to Medina and became a politician and warrior in jihad. In 10 years he conquered all of Arabia and died without an enemy left standing.

One of the most important revelations about Islam is the myth of moderate, peaceful  Muslims.  Those “moderate” Muslims represent the early stages of Islamification.

This “peaceful Muslims = peaceful Islam” statements are actually about Muslim-ology, not Islam. It is perfectly fine to study Muslims, but do not draw conclusions about Islam from them. There is a cause and effect relationship that is confused. Islam causes Muslims. Muslims do not cause Islam. Muslim-ology teaches little about Islam.

This means that you judge Muslims by Islam, not Islam by Muslims. If you want to know anything about Islam read the Trilogy. If you want to know if someone is a moderate Muslim, use Islam to measure them, not personal opinion.

Again, what you must understand is that Osma bin Laden is a moderate Muslim.  He is an Islamic holy man.  All the jihadist killers and murderers are moderate Muslims performing holy divine acts.  This is the evil, insane but cold, hard reality of Islam.  1.2 billion people believe in this madness.  In Islam, doctrine matters

THE TRUTH OF ISLAM    

Islam is totally and completely bogus – a sham and a fraud.  The Koran is not the word/teachings of God but the word/teachings of Allah (the ANTI GOD) – the word/teachings of Muhammad.   The Koran is a book of evil which is a very great sin and obscenity against God.  As will be shown in this website, Allah was the fictional creation of Muhammad who was no prophet of any God.  Muhammad invented Islam.  Muhammad was Allah and Allah was Muhammad.

Muhammad – the prophet of peace, the apostle of god, ordered 60 massacres and personally participated in 27 of these acts of carnage.  As the exemplary example and the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct Muhammad massacred, beheaded, tortured, terrorized, raped, and looted in the name of God.

In the Massacre of BanuQuraiza, Muhammad personally beheaded Jewish men and ordered the beheading of 600 to 900.  To distinguish young Jewish boys from young Jewish men he ordered his SS jihadists – “the Companions” to pull down the pants of the terrified boys.  Just the slightest traces of hair around the genital area and the young Jewish boy were taken away and beheaded.  Muhammad took a Jewish woman as his sex slave and looted the property of the murdered Jews and sold their women and little girls that the jihadists did not want as sex slaves into slavery.    Allah – the godfather and mafia chieftain of the Muhammad crime family rejoiced by creating as Eternal Laws of God – 5 teachings in the Koran celebrating the great slaughter of the BanuQuraiza Jews and enslavement of terrified women.

At the Massacre of Kaibyr, Muhammad brutally tortured a Jewish chieftain to reveal where he had hidden the golden treasure of Kaibyr.  When the chieftain refused to give Muhammad the treasure he was taken away and beheaded.  This chieftain was the husband of a most beautiful 17 year old Jewish woman – Safiyaah.   After murdering her father, brothers, uncles, husband – Muhammad will attack and rape Safiyaah.

During the massacre of The Jewish Settlement of BaniMustaliq – Muhammad will capture and rape a twenty year old Jewish girl – Juwairiya.  MUHAMMAD WAS THE FIRST NAZI SS MAN.

If Islam was a true religion of peace in which Muslims prayed 5 times a day, fasted for one month yearly, abstained from alcohol, went on a pilgrimage once in a lifetime then nobody would care.  But this is not the reality of Islam.

Islam is not a religion but a political – military ideology with religious trappings masquerading as a religion. Only 10% of Islam has anything to do with religion, the other 90% is political.

The Koran is not the bible but the Islamic Mein Kampf.

In order to understand Islam, you must suspend all rationally and reason.   Everything you have ever been taught about God, the equality of humanity, morality, golden rule, goodness and kindness must be abandoned for the irrational, immoral World of Allah – the ANTI GOD where deceit, assassination, massacre, extermination, genocide, murder, rape, slavery, terror, torture, brutality, hate, robbery, looting and pillaging are not criminal acts but holy blessed duties, halal (legal) acts as long as they are perpetrated on kafirs guarantying accession to a Paradise filled with voluminous breasted, lustrous eyed virgins that they can sexually molest for all eternity.  Islam permits polygamy, pedophilia, wife beating, marriage with adopted son’s wives and unlimited sex with sex slaves. Allah is a pedophile permitting Muslim men to rape Muslim baby girls.

ALL MUSLIMS REGARD THE KORAN AS THE ETERNAL DIVINE WORD/TEACHINGS OF GOD THAT ARE UNCHANGEABLE (FOREVER)AND CAN NEVER BE QUESTIONED.   THESE HEINOUS ACTS ARE JUST SOME OF THE DIVINE ETERNAL EVIL LAWS IN THE KORAN THAT ARE NOT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – ARE NOT SINS AGAINST GOD – ARE NOT CRIMES AGAINST THE LAWS OF GOD BUT ARE THE LAWS OF ALLAH (THE ANTI GOD).  MUSLIMS WHO QUESTION JUST ONE WORD OF THE KORAN ARE NO LONGER MUSLIMS BUT APOSTATES OF ISLAM AND CAN BE KILLED.

Islam is anti-God.  Islam is a total and complete renunciation of God.   While Muslims believe that there is only one God of the universe, their conception of God – a being they call Allah is not God but the ANTI GOD.  This Allah (the ANTI GOD) worshipped by Muslims has divided all human beings into believers (Muslims) and non-believers (kafirs i.e. YOU – Non Muslim.)  Allah hates all kafirs with an intense passion.  Kafirs are sub – human beings.  They have zero humanity.  Muslims must submit to Allah without question, non-believers must submit to and be the slaves of Muslims, and Muslim women must submit to Muslim men.

Islam means submission.  Islam demands the complete surrender of all human beings to Allah.

Islam is all about Muslim men.  It is an evil ideology created by a man – Muhammad for his male followers granting them unlimited sex, riches, and political power.

Allah hates all Muslim women with a deep seated loathing.  Muslim women are vile, dirty, stupid creatures.  Muslim men can have multiple wives, unlimited sex slaves, can marry and rape Muslim baby girls, beat his wives, and murder them and his daughters if they dare impugn his honor.  Whereas kafirs have zero humanity, Muslim women are only just slightly higher on the human evolutionary scale having evolved to being half a human.  This is the divine order of the universe ordained by Allah.  This vision of the inequality of Muslim women to Muslim men, and the Eternal sub – humanness and lack of humanity of kafirs is FOREVER and can never be changed in any way.

It is the prime directive of Islam to conquer the nations of the world for Allah by whatever means necessary.   Allah seeks the extermination of all kafirs.  By refusing to convert to Islam, kafirs have declared war against Islam, are a grave danger to Allah and must be destroyed.   Islam is a declaration of war against kafirs.  The Koran is not a holy book but a book of war.  A book of genocide.   Allah is a god of war.   This war is permanent until all kafirs convert to Islam or agree to pay a devastating Jizya (submission tax) or are murdered.

For Muslims, it is a holy religious duty to murder kafirs.  The Quran is written in the language of terrorism. It is filled with numerous verses urging the Muslims to terrorize the non-Muslims, kill them, and take possession of their lands and properties.  The important points to remember are that whatever Muhammad did to terrorize the kafirs was actually the actions of God.  Among the many verses which exhort Islamist terrorism, the following verses stand out as naked aggression of Allah/Muhammad on the unbelievers: 2:63, 3:151, 8:12, 8:60, 8:59, 9:5, 9:29, 9:55, 11:102, and 17:59 etc.  These teachings are the Eternal Laws of Allah authorizing murder and extermination as a holy duty.

Again as a kafir, you are not a human being to a Muslim.   You have absolutely no humanity.  A Muslim has the full right granted to him by God, to murder you, take your wife and young daughter(s) rape and gang rape them (no matter what the age of your daughter) take them as sex slaves or sell them into slavery to be breed like cattle  for future sex slaves and profit.  Your male children will be beheaded if they are young men.   If there is any doubt as to whether your young son is a young man or a young boy, Muslims will pull down their pants and examine their genitals for the slightest growth of hair.  Just the slightest hair growth is enough for him to be beheaded.  All your property will be seized and whatever the Muslim does not want to keep as his personal property, the remainder will be sold.

As a kafir you have absolutely NO RIGHT TO OWN ANYTHING.  It is a sacrilege against Allah.  All your property – your home, car, money, furniture, stocks and bonds, corporations, farms, is the property of the Muslims who have holy blood flowing through their veins.  Your wife and children are the Muslim’s property to be tortured, brutalized, raped as the Muslim desires.

If a Muslim kills or is killed murdering, raping, pillaging non – Muslims then they are guaranteed accession by God  to a Paradise of  full breasted, lustrous eyed virgins who regenerate as virgins after each sex act that they can sexually molest with external erections for all eternity.  THIS IS THE EVIL INSANITY THAT IS ISLAM.

Dar al-Islam and dar Al-harb: the House of Islam and the House of War (By Robert Spencer) 

Islam is based on an uncompromising division of the world between Believer and Unbeliever, or Infidel: dar al-Islam (The house of Islam) and dar Al-harb (the House of War).  There must be a state of war between the two — though not always a state of open warfare.  For Muslims have a duty to spread Islam, and to constantly expand the boundaries of Dar al-Islam, the place where Islam dominates, and Muslims rule. This is a duty, not a suggestion.

All Muslims Must Make Jihad

Jihad is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded. Allah has ascribed great importance to jihad and has made the reward of the martyrs and the fighters in His way a splendid one. Only those who have acted similarly and who have modeled themselves upon the martyrs in their performance of jihad can join them in this reward. Furthermore, Allah has specifically honored the Mujahideen {those who wage jihad} with certain exceptional qualities, both spiritual and practical, to benefit them in this world and the next. Their pure blood is a symbol of victory in this world and the mark of success and felicity in the world to come.

Those who can only find excuses, however, have been warned of extremely dreadful punishments and Allah has described them with the most unfortunate of names. He has reprimanded them for their cowardice and lack of spirit, and castigated them for their weakness and truancy. In this world, they will be surrounded by dishonor and in the next they will be surrounded by the fire from which they shall not escape though they may possess much wealth. The weaknesses of abstention and evasion of jihad are regarded by Allah as one of the major sins, and one of the seven sins that guarantee failure.

Islam is concerned with the question of jihad and the drafting and the mobilization of the entire Umma {the global Muslim community} into one body to defend the right cause with all its strength than any other ancient or modern system of living, whether religious or civil. The verses of the Qur’an and the Sunnah of Muhammad are overflowing with all these noble ideals and they summon people in general (with the most eloquent expression and the clearest exposition) to jihad, to warfare, to the armed forces, and all means of land and sea fighting.

The violent injunctions of the Quran and the violent precedents set by Muhammad set the tone for the Islamic view of politics and of world history. Islamic scholarship divides the world into two spheres of influence, the House of Islam (dar al-Islam) and the House of War (dar Al-harb). Islam means submission, and so the House of Islam includes those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule, which is to say those nations ruled by Sharia law. The rest of the world, which has not accepted Sharia law and so is not in a state of submission, exists in a state of rebellion or war with the will of Allah. It is incumbent on dar al-Islam to make war upon dar Al-harb until such time that all nations submit to the will of Allah and accept Sharia law. Islam’s message to the non-Muslim world is the same now as it was in the time of Muhammad and throughout history: submit or be conquered. The only times since Muhammad when dar al-Islam was not actively at war with dar Al-harb were when the Muslim world was too weak or divided to make war effectively.

But the lulls in the ongoing war that the House of Islam has declared against the House of War do not indicate a forsaking of jihad as a principle but reflect a change in strategic factors. It is acceptable for Muslim nations to declare hudna, or truce, at times when the infidel nations are too powerful for open warfare to make sense. Jihad is not a collective suicide pact even while “killing and being killed” (Sura 9:111) is encouraged on an individual level. For the past few hundred years, the Muslim world has been too politically fragmented and technologically inferior to pose a major threat to the West. But that is changing.

Sharia Law (By Robert Spencer)

Democracy and freedom are an affront to Allah.  All constitutions are offense to Allah and must be destroyed and replaced with Sharia Law.

Large parts of the Koran are legal code and form Islamic constitutional law. Since Muslims believe that these laws come from Allah and Mohammed they are of a higher order truth than any man-made laws. Therefore, Sharia law must replace all other forms of government.

Sharia is the legal code ordained by Allah for all mankind.  To violate Sharia or not to accept its authority is to commit rebellion against Allah, which Allah’s faithful are required to combat.  Under Sharia law, all kafirs are second class citizens. Women can be beaten and slavery is allowed. And just as in political Islam, Sharia law cannot be reformed.

It is the long term goal of Islam to replace the US Constitution with the Sharia, since it contradicts Islam. For that matter, democracy violates Sharia law. Democracy assumes equality of all peoples. Islam teaches that a Muslim is a better person than kafirs and that the kafirs should submit to Islam. But in voting, a Muslim’s vote is equal to a kafir’s vote. This violates Islamic law, since a Muslim and a kafir are never equal.

There is no separation between the religious and the political in Islam; rather Islam and Sharia constitute a comprehensive means of ordering society at every level. While it is in theory possible for an Islamic society to have different outward forms — an elective system of government, a hereditary monarchy, etc. — whatever the outward structure of the government, Sharia is the prescribed content. It is this fact that puts Sharia into conflict with forms of government based on anything other than the Quran and the Sunnah.

The precepts of Sharia may be divided into two parts:

1. Acts of worship (Al-ibadat), which includes:

Ritual Purification (Wudu)

Prayers (Salah)

Fasts (Sawm and Ramadan)

Charity (Zakat)

Pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj)

2. Human interaction (Al-muamalat), which includes:

Financial transactions

Endowments

Laws of inheritance

Marriage, divorce, and child care

Food and drink (including ritual slaughtering and hunting)

Penal punishments

War and peace

Judicial matters (including witnesses and forms of evidence)

As one may see, there are few aspects of life that Sharia does not specifically govern. Everything from washing one’s hands to child-rearing to taxation to military policy fall under its dictates. Because Sharia is derivate of the Quran and the Sunnah, it affords some room for interpretation. But upon examination of the Islamic sources, it is apparent that any meaningful application of Sharia is going to look very different from anything resembling a free or open society in the Western sense. The stoning of adulterers, execution of apostates and blasphemers, repression of other religions, and a mandatory hostility toward non-Islamic nations punctuated by regular warfare will be the norm. It seems fair then to classify Islam and its Sharia code as a form of totalitarianism.

The most important teaching in Islam is that all Muslims MUST believe that the Koran is the Eternal divine word of God – the Eternal laws of God.  All Muslims MUST believe that God authored the Koran and a copy of the Koran is in heaven. (That’s right – God Himself wrote the Koran and a copy is in heaven.)  The Koran remains for all Muslims, not just “fundamentalists,” the uncreated word of God Himself.  It is valid for all times and places forever; its ideas are absolutely true and beyond all criticism. To question it is to question the very word of God, and hence blasphemous. A Muslim’s duty is to believe it and obey its divine commands without question.

Muslims can be killed (beheaded) for doing any of the following:

Reviling Allah or his Messenger; (2) being sarcastic about ‘Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat’; (3) denying any verse of the Quran or ‘anything which by scholarly consensus belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it’; (4) holding that ‘any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent’; (5) reviling the religion of Islam; (6) being sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law; (7) denying that Allah intended ‘the Prophet’s message . . . to be the religion followed by the entire world.’

This means exactly what it says.  ALL MUSLIMS MUST BELIEVE that the Koran is the ETERNAL word/teachings of God to be followed without question.  If a Muslim challenges or questions the Koran, HE IS NO LONGER A MUSLIM BUT AN APOSTATE OF ISLAM and can be killed.

The Koran can never be changed not even one word.  When you are reading teachings of the Koran, you are reading the word of God himself and you must OBEY.  THERE IS NO CHOICE. There is no exercising free will, no employing logic, reason, rationality, morality.  These teachings are for all time – FOREVER AND EVER AND EVER.

This is the most important insanity that ALL Muslims believe – THAT MEANS ALL MUSLIMS.   This belief in the KORANIC ETERNAL LAWS OF GOD is a disaster that has the potential to destroy humanity and civilization as we know it.

Again, all the Kornic teachings of extermination, murder, rape, slavery, looting, terror, sex with little girls, the non-humanity of kafirs, sexual Paradise for Muslim killers etc. are FOREVER.

They are Islam.

Islam is not a wonderful religion of peace and love that has been hi – jacked and perverted by a few bad apples of evil Islamo – Fascists, Islamic militants, Islamic Fundamentalists, jihadists, Wahhabism, radical Islam, political Islam, Islamists etc.  There has been no hijacking.  There has been no perversion.  These demented souls are following exactly the teachings of the Koran and in the footsteps of the Prophet – Muhammad.  IT’S ALL ABOUT ISLAM STUPID INFIDEL

As already stated and what you must fully understand in order to protect your family and country against this very great evil living and flourishing among us is that the Koran defines the kafir as a subhuman who can be insulted, raped, robbed, killed, threatened or tortured.  For Allah, these are holy, divine acts.

In Islam there is no Golden Rule – treat others as you wish to be treated.  The Ten Commandments do not apply to kafirs.

The Golden Rule is centered on ethics, not god, and is universal to all cultures, except Islam. Indeed, the whole Islamic Trilogy (Koran, Sira and Hadith) denies the truth of the Golden Rule.

If the Golden Rule was applied to Islam removing hate and violent teachings directed against the kafir – and the hate directed against Muslim women about 61% of the Koran would vanish, 75% of the Sira and 20% of the Hadith would also go away.

The Golden Rule even changes Hell. Islamic Hell is primarily political. Hell is mentioned 146 times in the Koran. Only 9 references are for moral failings—greed, lack of charity, love of worldly success. The other 137 references to Hell involve eternal torture for not agreeing that Mohammed is right. That is a political charge, not a morals failure. Thus 94% of the references to Hell are as a political prison for dissenters. The Golden Rule would empty Islam’s political prison.

The Golden Rule annihilates the ethics of cruelty.  Golden Rule Islam would be a reformed Islam that the kafirs would not fear and dread. We are tired of living in fear of political Islam. We have suffered enough and would welcome an Islam that did not argue, demand, pressure, dhimmize, threaten, deceive and destroy kafirs and their civilization

No rational, normal person can believe in the evil that is Islam.

Muslim men who follow the evil teachings of the Koran are not going to Allah’s sexually depraved paradise of full breasted, lustrous eyed virgins but will lose their eternal souls and join Muhammad and his master Satan in the fires of Hell.
NOW ENTER THE EVIL WORLD OF ISLAM – A WORLD DEVOID OF ALL HUMANITY – THE WORLD OF ALLAH (THE ANTI-GOD)

Posted by God of Freedom

Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?

Tue, October 30, 2012

by:

Clare Lopez

The remains of Americans killed in Benghazi are taken off a transport aircraft (Photo: Reuters)

Data points continue to accumulate about the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. The picture that is beginning to emerge from connecting those dots is deeply concerning on multiple levels. Two related issues dominate this analysis: The stripping of security protection from the Benghazi mission prior to the 9/11 anniversary attack and the refusal to send or even permit local help on the night of the attack.

As Fox News Bureau Chief of Intelligence Catherine Herridge suggested on the “Mike Huckabee” show on Oct. 27, both of these critical subjects may have been driven by a perceived need to cover up the existence of the role being played by the U.S. mission in Libya to serve as a command hub for the movement of weapons out of Libya to Syrian rebels fighting to bring down the Bashar Al-Assad regime.

It has now been established through the persistent work of Congressional leadership figures and such investigative journalists, media and talk show hosts  including Fox News, Michael Coren at Canada’s Sun News, Aaron Klein at World Net Daily and Diana West that the Benghazi mission played a central role in a U.S. government policy of “engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East,” as Center for Security Policy president, Frank Gaffney, put it.

Benghazi Staffed by CIA Operatives: What Was Their Role?

According to media reporting, Benghazi was staffed by CIA operatives whose job may have been not just to secure and destroy dangerous weapons (like RPGs and SAMs) looted from former Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi’s stockpiles during and after the 2011 revolution, but also perhaps to facilitate their onward shipment to the Al-Qaeda- and Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Syrian opposition.

President Barack Obama signed an intelligence finding sometime in early 2012 that authorized U.S. support for the Syrian rebels and by mid-June 2012, CIA operatives reportedly were on the Turkish-Syrian border helping to steer weapons deliveries to selected Syrian rebel groups. According to an Oct. 14, 2012 New York Times article, most of those arms were going to “hard-line Islamic jihadists.”

One of those jihadis may well be Abdelhakim Belhadj, former leader of the Al-Qaeda-linked

Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and head of the Tripoli Military Council after Qaddafi’s ouster. During the 2011 revolt in Libya, Belhadj was almost certainly a key contact of the U.S. liaison to the Libyan opposition, Christopher Stevens.

Abdelhakim Belhadj

In November 2011, Belhadj was reported to have met with Syrian Free Army (SFA) leaders in Istanbul, Turkey, as well as on the Turkish-Syrian border. Further, Belhadj’s contact with the SFA comes in the context of  official policy adopted by the post-Qaddafi Libyan “government,” which sent a delegation to Turkey to offer arms and possibly fighters to the Turkish-backed Syrian rebels. “There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” according to a Libyan source quoted in a November, 2011 Telegraph report.

The Libya-Syria Arms Funnel

The multilateral U.S.-Libya-Turkey agreement to get weapons into the hands of Syrian rebels – which were known to be dominated by Al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood elements — by working with and through Al-Qaeda-linked jihadist figures like Belhadj, seemed confirmed by the appearance of a  Libyan-flagged vessel, Al-Entisar, which docked at the Turkish port of Iskenderun on September 6, 2012.

Suspected of carrying weapons bound for the Syrian rebels, the ship’s cargo reportedly included Russian-designed, shoulder-launched missiles known as MANPADS, RPGs and surface-to-air missiles—all of them just the sort of weapons available in Libya.

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens

Stevens’ last meeting in Benghazi the night he was killed was with the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, who is variously reported to have been there to discuss a weapons transfer or a warning about the possible compromise of the Libyan weapons pipeline to Syria. Whatever the topic of Ambassador Stevens’ discussion with Akin, he clearly and knowingly put himself in harm’s way to be there, in Benghazi, on the night of September 11.

Why Stevens Traveled to Benghazi the Night of the Attack

The urgency that compelled Stevens to Benghazi that night seems especially difficult to understand given what was known to him as well as to senior levels of the Obama administration about the extremely dangerous situation in post-Qaddafi Libya.

It is all the more baffling then that, in view of the obvious priority that the U.S. government had placed on its Libya-to-Syria weapons pipeline operation, such a systematic effort in the weeks leading up to the September 11 attack was dedicated to stripping the Benghazi base of the security protection it so desperately needed in a deteriorating Libyan security environment and despite the repeated pleas of Ambassador Stevens and others in both Tripoli and Benghazi for more security.

Increased Security Requests Turned Down

From at least February, 2012 onward, the Regional Security Officer (RSO) at the U.S. Tripoli Embassy, Eric Nordstrom, had urged that U.S. security measures in Libya be expanded, citing dozens of security incidents by “Al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, including Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)…”

In August 2012, Stevens reported that the security situation in Benghazi was deteriorating, yet in spite of this, the 16-man Site Security Team assigned to Libya, comprised of Special Forces led by SF LTC Andy Wood, was ordered out of Libya, contrary to the Ambassador’s stated desire that they stay.

Note that, at any time, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could have ordered the deployment to Benghazi of additional security experts from the Department of Security (DoS) Bureau of Diplomatic Security (or Diplomatic Security Service—DSS), but apparently chose not to do so.

Instead, DoS hired a British firm, Blue Mountain, to manage its security in Benghazi, and Blue Mountain subcontracted the job to a local jihadist militia called the February 17 Martyrs Brigade who have known Muslim Brotherhood ties.

Furthermore, Nordstrom testified at the October 11, 2012 Congressional hearings that “in deference to sensitivity to Libyan practice, the guards at Benghazi were unarmed”– an inexplicable practice for a place as dangerous as Benghazi.

Then, in what may have been the attack “green light,” on September 10, 2012, AQ leader Ayman al-Zawahiri called on Libyans to avenge the death of his Libyan number two, Abu Yahya al-Libi, who had been killed in a June, 2012 drone strike in Pakistan. The timing suggests that al-Zawahiri may have given the attack go-ahead after receiving word that Stevens had arrived in Benghazi that day—further suggesting that perhaps AQ knew of Stevens’ travel plans.

Gov. Sees Attack in Live-Stream Video

Once the attack unfolded at the Benghazi base, it quickly became apparent that the minimal number of U.S. and local security staff was completely unequal to the scores of heavily armed jihadist attackers swarming the compound. And yet, despite a live-streaming video from an overhead drone, plus cables and cell phone calls that, altogether, must have been received by hundreds of administration diplomatic, intelligence and military officials (including the U.S. President, Vice President, Secretaries of Defense and State, and Directors of National Intelligence and CIA), military support from regional bases was denied repeatedly to the besieged Benghazi defenders.

Tyrone Woods

Worse yet, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods, who was providing security for CIA operatives at the Benghazi annex facility, and Glen Doherty, who had arrived on a rescue flight dispatched by the CIA Chief of Station in Tripoli, repeatedly were denied permission by their CIA chain of command on the ground to go to the aid of Ambassador Stevens and the others.

Glen Doherty

Eventually, they went anyway, and succeeded in saving many lives because of their moral and physical courage. Once back at the CIA annex, they all came Glen Doherty under heavy fire there too. Again, Doherty and Woods requested military backup, at least to silence the mortar fire that they had been able to identify by laser painting it. They fought on alone for hours, but when no help came, that mortar barrage eventually took both their lives and seriously injured others.

Sec. of Defense Panetta Claims of “No Knowledge” Questionable

When asked why he didn’t authorize military assets to scramble to Benghazi’s defense, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta claimed that he didn’t know what was going on and “could not put forces at risk in that situation.” This is patently false on both counts: Panetta most certainly did know that an American Ambassador and other staff were under military assault by jihadist forces who had invaded the sovereign territory of a U.S. diplomatic facility. Whether U.S. military assets — either air support or Special Forces — could have arrived in time to save lives is unknown at this point, but the administration’s refusal to say when the president first learned that Benghazi was under attack, that the ambassador was in peril and that the Al-Qaeda-linked Libyan jihadist group, Ansar al-Shariah, had taken credit for the attack invites speculation.

The White House refusal to comment on when exactly the president first met with the National Security Council after the attack began doesn’t help either. (And the weeks of deliberately false statements from a range of administration figures who tried to claim that an obscure trailer for a film no one had ever seen was to blame for the Benghazi debacle only confirms suspicions about the administration capitulation to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) demands for limits on free speech.)

For his part, CIA Director David Petraeus has denied that either he or anyone else at CIA refused assistance to Doherty and Woods, saying that “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate.” This leaves only the president himself responsible for the decision to allow the Benghazi base to fall and four Americans to die.

Tough Questions

How could he or any of those present when this momentous decision was made not have tried to make every effort imaginable to defend American territory and save American lives? House Government Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa believes President Obama had a political motive for rejecting Ambassador Stevens’ security requests because he wanted to show that conditions in Libya were improving, possibly to justify U.S. intervention in the Libyan revolution or even help pave the way for oil company investment.

Whatever the thinking that left a U.S. mission abroad so undefended that it practically constituted an open invitation to Al-Qaeda, and then, in cold blood, refused to launch military support in defense of Americans fighting and dying to defend U.S. sovereign territory from jihadi assault, the cover-up is fast becoming the worse failure. It is time for administration leaders, from the president on down, to explain both their actions and their failures to act.

Fox News video clip here

Posted on 30 Oct 12 by RadicalIsalm.org

ANOTHER Muslim candidate for Congress and what the media won’t tell you about him

Dr. Syed Taj, an Indian-born Michigan Muslim Candidate for Congress accepts Hamas-linked CAIR support and funding, and is embraced by radical Muslims.

By: Jeff Davis, Michigan resident

October 25, 2012

An Indian-born Michigan Muslim Democrat running for U.S. Congress with ties to radical Islam has accepted a campaign contribution from CAIR PAC (Council on American Islamic Relations), an unindicted co-conspirator in the nation’s largest-ever terror-financing trial.

Even though Michigan’s 11^th District, which he hopes to represent, is predominately non-Muslim, Dr. Syed Sabahuddin Taj told the Arab American News that representing Muslims was a top reason he is running for Congress.

 

“I looked around at the congress (sic) and realized there really is no representation for us, number one as minorities, and number two as Muslims. Those were two reasons for me to come out,” Dr. Taj said.  He has been supported by both Muslim members of Congress, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, and Andre Carson of Indiana.

In the same article Dr. Taj said he opposes anti-Sharia legislation that has been introduced in Michigan and around the country (retired_don’s emphasis), and opposes provisions of the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was signed by President Obama. He also opposed an initiative by the Michigan secretary of state requiring a citizen checkbox on voting ballots.

The 11^th District includes northwest suburbs of Detroit in Wayne and Oakland counties and is an amalgam of working-class neighborhoods and affluent professional communities. Oakland County includes the nation’s largest concentration of Chaldeans, who fled war and Muslim oppression in Iraq.  It is also home to the state’s largest concentration of Jews. 

The district was formerly represented by Thaddeus McCotter, who resigned his post, thus the seat is now vacant.  Dr. Taj is running against Republican businessman, teacher and veteran of the Vietnam and Iraqi wars, Kerry Bentivolio.

Dr. Taj has been supported by Dawud Walid, the high-profile executive director of CAIR-Michigan, who recently said in a sermon at a mosque in Warren, Mich., “Who are those who incurred the wrath of Allah? They are the Jews. They are the Jews … And those who go astray are the Christians.”

Walid has also been instrumental in rallying opposition against legislation in Michigan that would affirm the supremacy of the U.S. Constitution in American courts. Walid has publicly encouraged Muslims not to cooperate with U.S. law enforcement officials who he charged entrap Muslims in surveillance operations.  He was one of several speakers at an anti-NYPD rally last year defending convicted terrorists as victims of entrapment and abusive treatment, including one convicted of trying to kill American troops and FBI agents in Afghanistan. Dr. Taj too, has raised the issue of alleged Muslim victimhood and made it central to his candidacy.

According to the Arab American News, Dr. Taj has been endorsed by prominent  Michigan imams Syed  Qazwini and Mohammad Mardini. Qazwini, who heads up the nation’s largest mosque in America (in Dearborn), is an open supporter of US-designated terror organizations Hamas and Hezballah. He also called for anti-blasphemy measures in the US shortly after false reports that the film, “Innocence of Muslims” provoked the rampage of violence in the Middle East in September. He attended a U.S. State Department Eid dinner two days after the massacre in Benghazi, Libya and, according to the Detroit Free Press, said “the U.S. response should be much more stronger (sic) than verbal condemnation.”  Two days later UN Ambassador appeared on five Sunday talk and blamed the violence on the video trailer.

Dr. Taj also received a campaign contribution from Victor Begg, founder of the Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan, an umbrella group whose member and partner organizations include CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood front groups.

Dr. Taj is certainly no stranger to radical Islam. His own brother gained international notoriety in 1988 for leading the effort to have Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses,” banned in India, sparking a wave of riots and bombings worldwide. His brother, Syed Shahabuddin, was a member of India’s Parliament and acknowledged that he never read Rushdie’s book. In a letter published by The New York Times, Rushdie  called Taj’s brother and his fellow book-banners “extremists” and “fundamentalists”…

 “When Syed Shahabuddin and his fellow self-appointed guardians of Muslim sensibilities say that ‘no civilized society’ should permit the publication of a book like mine, they have got things backwards.” “The right to freedom of expression is at the foundation of any democratic society” Rushdie wrote.

Dr. Taj has also been embraced by the Michigan Socialist Party, which held a fund-raiser for him, and the American Medical Association this week contributed a total of $250,000 to his campaign. The Democratic Socialists of America’s website can be viewed here: http://detroitdsa.com/ddsaevents.php 

Posted 25 Oct 12 by BNI

[We have a lot of Muslims voting and running for office this year…the ones voting are voting for “Christian” Barack Hussein Obama, (good reason is they are told they are allowed to participate in the Great Satan I mean American elections). It is against Shari’a Law for any Muslim to campaign for being a part of a non-Muslim government, as well as for a Muslim to vote in any non-Muslim election…until 2008…according to Sheikh Salman al-Oadah, a Muslim can run for office in non-Muslim countries so they can help advance Shari’a into that country…and Muslims are not authorized to vote for anyone in non-Muslim countries that are not Muslim. And the majority of Muslims that voted (currently 1.3 million are registered) have been told to vote for all Muslim runners for anything in the government, including vote for Obama…but 86% or so of Americans feel Obama is a Christian because he said he was…Muslims are not allowed to vote for him if he wasn’t a Muslim…so, you figure it out if he is a Muslim or not.
But the matter of this fact is that we have another Muslim running for Congress…which means another one that will work on trying to get Islam into America by passing bills and what not, (like Ellison and Carson) that will help push Shari'a on freedom loving Americans.

And, as you have read, he will do what he can to stop anti-sharia bills that will be put on table for voting…because of the Muslim Brotherhood’s grand jihad in taking a non-Muslim country over, as well as trying to, like Obama, Carson and Ellison, give Muslims more rights because they indoctrinated minds feel Muslims are better than anyone else.

Of topic for a second…have you noticed that Muslims running for office like to leave their names sounding American or leaving their definite Muslim name middle name out? Keith Ellison, Andre Carson, would you think they were Muslim? Barack Obama, would you think he was a devout Muslim or a converted Christian? Hussein is a Shi’a name, and Obama doesn’t use it in America, but when he is at Muslim countries, he makes sure everyone knows him as Barack Hussein Obama…a Christian and not a Muslim? Once again, you decide]

Email Shows Obama’s State Department Rejecting Request of Security Team To Retain DC-3 at US Embassy in Libya

Obama’s America

Fly the friendly skies of Libya Airlines, [….]

Via Jake Tapper @ABCNews

ABC News has obtained an internal State Department email from May 3, 2012, indicating that the State Department denied a request from the security team at the Embassy of Libya to retain a DC-3 airplane in the country to better conduct their duties.

Copied on the email was U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in a terrorist attack on the diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, Sept. 11, 2012, along with three other Americans. That attack has prompted questions about whether the diplomatic personnel in that country were provided with adequate security support.

No one has yet to argue that the DC-3 would have definitively made a difference for the four Americans killed that night. The security team in question, after all, left Libya in August

[Continue reading]

It was bad enough those in Benghazi had no quick transport out, but the Obama Administration rejected military intervention during the attack

The hour is 5 p.m., Sept. 11, Washington time, and the scene is an Oval Office meeting among President Obama, the secretary of defense, the national security adviser and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi has been under assault for roughly 90 minutes. Some 30 U.S. citizens are at mortal risk. The whereabouts of Ambassador Stevens are unknown.

What is uppermost on the minds of the president and his advisers? The safety of Americans, no doubt. So what are they prepared to do about it? Here is The Wall Street Journal’s account of the meeting:

“There was no serious consideration at that hour of intervention with military force, officials said. Doing so without Libya’s permission could represent a violation of sovereignty and inflame the situation, they said. Instead, the State Department reached out to the Libyan government to get reinforcements to the scene.”

So it did. Yet the attack was far from over. After leaving the principal U.S. compound, the Americans retreated to a second, supposedly secret facility, which soon came under deadly mortar fire. Time to call in the troops?

Continued below the fold:

Some officials said the U.S. could also have sent aircraft to the scene as a ‘show of force’ to scare off the attackers,” the Journal reported, noting that there’s a U.S. air base just 450 miles away in Sicily. “State Department officials dismissed the suggestions as unrealistic. ‘They would not have gotten there in two hours, four hours or six hours.’”

The U.S. security detail only left Benghazi at 8 a.m. on Sept. 12, more than 10 hours after the attacks began. A commercial jet liner can fly from D.C. to Benghazi in about the same time.

Obama did build this.

Related:
Obama’s State Department CUT Security at Benghazi????

Posted on 5 Oct 12 by Jawa Report