• September 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    282930  
  • Truth about Islam and Shari’a law

  • Blog Stats

    • 60,263 hits
  • Must Read! Click Picture!

  • Must Read: click picture!

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 32 other followers

  • Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

    Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

  • We love & support Israel!!!

  • Get Educated & Educate Others!! Click the Picture!

    CLICK THIS PICTURE!!!

  • NO TOLERANCE FOR INTOLERANCE, NO APOLOGY FOR BEING FREE!!!

  • Key Strategies for the Counter Jihad!

    Click on image above - read about strategies!

Forensic Experts Call Foley Beheading Video by ISIS ‘..Staged..’


isis-foley-video-1

by, Alex Newman | The New American

Following an explosive report in The Times of London citing forensic experts, the establishment press around the world is now reporting that the video purporting to show the beheading of American journalist James Foley by an Islamic State (ISIS) jihadist was probably “staged.” Other respected analysts had suggested that the execution footage could be bogus even before that. While it seems to be generally accepted that Foley was indeed killed, questions surrounding the barbaric alleged death and its implications continue to grow around the world. Countless theories and claims have surfaced purporting to explain it.

As doubts about the video spread like wildfire, Obama and other Western governments have already seized on it to advance various controversial objectives. The Obama administration, for example, citing the alleged threat of the Islamic State that supposedly beheaded Foley, announced unconstitutional military attacks in Syria and Iraq. Separately, U.K. authorities issued a warning to British subjects that even “viewing” the ISIS video purporting to show the journalist’s execution may be a crime under “terrorism” statutes in the United Kingdom. Analysts said the precedent was deeply troubling.

Still, the video has been viewed by experts, and they concluded that it does not show what it purports to show. “I think it has been staged,” one of the unidentified “visual forensics experts” told The Times after reviewing the video footage for the newspaper. “My feeling is that the execution may have happened after the camera was stopped.” The Times report, based on the analysis of an international forensic science company with links to police forces across Britain, promptly sparked headlines throughout the United Kingdom and the rest of the world.

Here is the ‘ACTUAL’ video that ISIS released: Uncut and Uncensored

(Livelinks has taken all ISIS videos offline because they are getting too many beheading videos)

The forensic analysts cited in the original report highlighted the fact that, even after enhancements, no blood is visible up to the point where the picture fades to black. That is despite the video showing the knife going across the upper neck at least six times, the analysts told The Times. Separately, the sounds supposedly being made by the journalist during his alleged beheading also appear inconsistent with what would be expected, the paper reported. Prior to the purported execution, the footage also appears to include a “blip” that suggests Foley may have had to repeat a line.

Without explaining how it came to such a conclusion, the forensic analysis firm, which asked not to be named, claimed that there was no doubt that Foley had been killed — despite the apparent use of camera tricks and “slick” post-production manipulation. “No one is disputing that at some point an execution occurred,” the company said. Other analysts said such a conclusion seemed bizarre. ISIS, of course, has posted numerous gruesome videos of its mass murder, beheadings, terror attacks, and other assorted horrors. Why would the outfit execute Foley but then stage a video of it, rather than just showing the real event?

One purported explanation was offered by the regime of Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad, which has been hard at work trying to crush ISIS and other jihadist forces — some backed by Obama — amid an ongoing civil war. According to Assad’s official spokesperson and political advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, Foley was actually murdered a year ago after being captured by the Obama administration-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) and then sold to ISIS.

“You can check with the UN,” Shaaban was quoted as saying in the Daily Mail, a leading U.K. newspaper, during an interview aired on the state-funded BBC. “James Foley was killed a year ago, not now, they only released the pictures now, but he was killed a year ago. We have definite information, the UN has the information.” While the brutal Syrian autocracy is hardly considered a reliable source, its claims about Foley have been widely reported in the international press. The UN has not confirmed whether it has information supporting the allegations.

Foley’s family and friends, meanwhile, blasted the claims made by the Syrian dictatorship, calling them “disgraceful.” Pointing to statements made by a Danish journalist who reportedly saw Foley in June while being held in captivity, Foley’s family suggested Assad’s claims could not possibly be true. GlobalPost chief Phil Balboni, Foley’s boss, also said the Syrian regime’s claims were “totally false” and “contradicted by a very significant body of incontrovertible evidence.” He said there were multiple accounts from hostages held with Foley as recently as last month. “It is a disgrace that this was ever broadcast,” Balboni added.

Even before The Times report and Assad’s claims sent shockwaves around the world, however, other experts were already questioning the video’s authenticity and urging caution as well. “Was Foley’s head really cut off? Hard to tell,” noted Eric Margolis, a prominent journalist who has often reported from dangerous war zones in the Middle East. “We have been fed so much fake government war propaganda in recent decades — from Kuwaiti babies thrown from incubators to Saddam’s hidden nukes — that we must be very cautious.”

isis-beheads-james-foley-1-resized
For now, British authorities have identified U.K. rapper and Islamist Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary as the likely jihadist seen in the video purportedly executing Foley. However, the analysis commissioned by The Times concluded that the journalist was probably killed off camera, meaning the British ISIS terrorist may not have been the actual murderer. (This offers another explanation for why Foley might have been killed off-camera: The jihadists wanted an English-speaking member on film, and the one they found didn’t have the stomach to barbarically murder someone.) In the video, entitled “A message to America,” Foley offers a statement claiming that the U.S. government was actually responsible for his murder. Another American journalist being held hostage by ISIS is also shown, with a warning that he would be next.

Shortly after the alleged beheading video surfaced on August 19, the Obama administration announced more unconstitutional military intervention in the region without obtaining congressional approval. Senior Obama national security advisor Ben Rhodes said the U.S. government would “do what is necessary” and would not be constrained by borders. In other words, after repeatedly failing to secure authority to do so from Congress, Obama will finally be launching direct military strikes in Syria — something he has wanted to do for years despite overwhelming public opposition. A previous claim pushed by Obama to justify launching a war in Syria alleging that Assad had used of chemical weapons eventually fell apart as a fraud.

This time, the administration seems even more determined. “If you come against Americans, we are going to come after you,” Rhodes said at a news conference at Obama’s vacation spot. “We’re actively considering what’s going to be necessary in dealing with that threat…. I think the American people understand that this president is very deliberate about military action. The American people also understand that there are some threats that have to be dealt with. We will take direct action against terrorists that threaten the United States.”

Left unmentioned, of course, is the fact that the Obama administration played a crucial role in empowering the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL) in the first place. By arming and training jihadists and terrorists in Syria to overthrow the Assad regime, U.S. taxpayers have literally armed and trained members of the Islamic State, which now styles itself a “caliphate” with authority over all Muslims. Countless Christians and other minorities have since been slaughtered by the terror group, often using U.S.-supplied weapons.

Whether the Foley video was staged or not, what seems apparent at this point is that the footage served the administration’s interests well — at least in terms of purporting to justify deepening U.S. involvement in the region. However, without a green light from Congress, Obama’s machinations in Syria and Iraq remain illegitimate and unconstitutional. If the president wants to take military action, he has a constitutional obligation to secure approval from the American people’s elected representatives.

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is currently based in Europe. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU.

Posted on 27 Aug 14 by Sharia Unveiled

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. The claim is that Al Qaeda worked with Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, but ISIS and Al Qaeda split up because ISIS is too radical for the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) (the creator of both terrorist groups)...this is a falsehood that Shari'a mandates ALL Muslims...the lying to fool infidels that will help the spread of Islam. The MB created both, and encouraged ISIS, gave resources to ISIS, trained ISIS into doing what they (the MB) wanted to do start an Islamic takeover of the world), but wanted to remain a false "peaceful" Muslim group. ISIS has been working on being put together for at least four years, and is not, according to the US DoD, a radical, jihadist, terrorist militia...it is a full small army, trained in small arms, mechanized infantry, heavy arms, and tanks.

What is needed to go against ISIS, as an army is an army...army verses army...you cannot send a few troops in there to fight an army...after all, Rambo was just a fictional character.]

The Noble Teachings of Islam


Posted by sharia unveiled on August 21, 2014

al-quran-19

O Islamophobic Kafers! Do Not Criticize Islam before Knowing the Noble Teachings of Islam Fully, Part 1

by, Mirza Ghalib | Islam Watch

Recently, I noticed most western social media making fun about a Saudi Sheikh, who was killed years ago by a donkey while he allegedly tried to sodomize the poor animal.

Never criticize Islam without knowing its noble teachings fully

It has become a fashion in recent years to make fun about anything and everything related to Islam without analyzing the depth of such incidents. Those who criticize Islam don’t have adequate knowledge about Islam and its founder Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Not that it is their fault, who mock the Prophet (pbuh) of Islam out of ignorance. Instead, it is absolutely the fault of Islam’s so-called Scholars, Mullahs and Imams, who gave up their responsibilities to worldly pleasures, and forgot to deliver the message delivered by our Prophet to the ignorant Kafers. Our prophet (pbuh) strongly insisted Muslims to deliver his message to each and every dirty Kafer till the Day of Resurrection. Though our so-called Scholars failed to deliver the Messages of our beloved Prophet, it becomes the responsibility of each Muslim who read the Islamic scriptures to share the Messages of our beloved Prophet (pbuh) to the unclean infidels.

Convey my teachings to the people – prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

Due to limited space for this article, I’ll give the extracts of hadiths and their numbers, by which the ‘Kafers’ can search the internet and check the detailed hadiths. In Part 1 of this article, let us investigate the reality behind the nasty Islamophobic infidel critics of Saudi Sheikh’s sodomy incident and enlighten them about Sodomy and Homosexuality in Islam.

Abu Dawud, Book 25, Hadith 3639: Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) allowed his companions to record his practices as hadiths so as to make easier to his followers to adopt his practices (Sunnah) in their day-to-day life.

Mishkat al Masabih I, p. 173: The Book of Allah and Sunnah of the Prophet is all you need. The apostle said, “I leave with you two things. If you hold fast by them both, you will never be misguided. The Quran and my Sunna”

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 56, Hadith 667: The Prophet said, “Convey (my teachings) to the people even if it were a single sentence….

Al Imran 3:31: “…If you love Allah, then follow me (Muhammad)…”

Al Ahzab 33:21: “Ye have indeed in the Apostle of Allah a beautiful pattern of (conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day.”

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 1, Book 3, Hadith 98: “…..Do not accept anything save the Hadiths of the Prophet. Circulate knowledge and teach the ignorant, for knowledge does not vanish except when it is kept secretly (to oneself).

Authenticity of Ahadith

Ahadith (plural of hadith) were collected in abundance, and were screened to such an extent that the watered-down collections of ahadith what we have today were reduced to less than 1% of the initial collections. This was done primarily due to the lack of ‘morality’ in most of the hadiths initially collected. For example, the author of Sahih Al-Bukhari had collected over 600,000 (some other reports assert 900,000) ahadith, of which he kept only 7397 as ‘dependable’. It is a shame on our irresponsible so-called Scholars, Mullahs and Imams for not making available even this less than 1% sanitized traditions of our beloved Prophet (pbuh) to the nonbelievers. Maybe they are just obliging to the following hadith for securing their livelihood:

Teach religion to the people according to their mental calibre” (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 1, The book of knowledge, Chapter 50, Hadith 129)

And the Quran also teaches Muslims to lie under its Al-Taqiya doctrine. (Quran: An-Nahl 16:106 & Al-Imran 3:28)

Let us forget the hypocrisy of our scholars and Imams. Here we are to convey the sacred teachings about Sodomy and Homosexuality that penetrated deeply in Islam, and will rub it on the faces of the stupid Kafers, who makes fun of our practices. I strongly ‘condemn’ the dirty criticism of the Kafers and give them the message that “Don’t talk anything against the Islamic sodomy or homosexuality from now on. Do you think you can eradicate Islam by raising the issue of sodomy in Islam? Well, Islam will not exist today without Sodomy and Homosexuality. Without Sodomy and Homosexuality, Islam will be like ‘omelet without an egg’.

Prophet Lot was sent exclusively to the land of sodomy

Islam has a long history of Sodomy and homosexuality.

There were 124,000 failed attempts of our Almighty and All-perfect Allah (saw) for bringing his creation to the righteous path, every time by sending a prophet to them in the tiny part (i.e. the Middle East) of the vast world. Amongst them, Prophet Lot was sent exclusively to the people of sodomy and homosexuality. Although the story of Prophet Lot in the Quran was copied from the Bible, it is not approved by us Muslims, as usual. The Quran contains several references to “the people of Lut”, the Biblical Lot, citing the residents of Sodom and Gomorrah (ref. Quran 7:80–84, 11:77–83, 15:61-75, 21:74, 22:43, 26:165–175, 27:54–58, and 29:27–35), and their destruction by Allah was explicitly due to their their perverse sexual practices. Despite this, most Muslims commit Sodomy, Allah (swt) knows better.

There happened an interesting incident during the Prophet Lot’s time, which is recorded in the Quran. It is about the visit of two angels to Prophet Lot somewhere in the Arab land. It is to be noted that Allah condemned the Christians in the Quran for giving feminine names to his angels, and says that all of his angels are male (Quran: An-Najm 53:27). After seeing the two ‘handsome’ boys (angels), a mob of the people of Lot started chasing to sodomize them. Loot rushed at a critical moment and saved the two angels of Allah (swt) by trading her two young daughters to the mob to rape and ravishes them. Remember! Lot traded his two girls to save the two boys (angels). This incident reflects the perverted mentality of the author of our Quran towards homosexuality.

Quran: Hood 11:78, Al-Hijr 15:71: Lot offers his daughters to a mob of angel rapists.

It is recorded in the History of Al-Tabari that about four million men lived in Sodomy during the period of Allah’s another Prophet, Moses (Al-Tabari 2:124)

About four million males in Sodomy during the period of Moses? Then what would be the total population during the period of Moses in Israel?

O Muslims! Control the thing inbetween your legs

Our beloved Prophet knew the art of teaching Allah’s message in simplest form. He taught Allah’s message to us in a very simple and easily understandable language, as if he was fond of speaking such language, as he did in the following hadith:

Malik, Book 56, Hadith 56.5.11 : “…..The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Whomever Allah protects from the evil of two things will enter the Garden. They are what is between his jaws and what is between his legs, what is between his jaws and what is between his legs, what is between his jaws and what is between his legs.”

O Muslim men! Don’t sleep without undergarment while sleeping in group with men

Our Prophet (pbuh) had a very clear idea about what would happen if his Sahaba didn’t wear their underwear while sleeping in groups. So, he always advised them before hand:

Abu Dawud: Book 32:Hadith 4038 : The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) forbade ……men sleeping together without an under-garment ….”.

Abu Dawud: Book 31:Hadith 4007 : The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man should not look at the private parts of another man…..”.

O Muslim martyrs! Enjoy your stay in your graves along with your fellow martyr

Our prophet (pbuh) was very grateful and responsible toward his martyred Sahaba, for they sacrificed their life to make him the Sultan of Arabia. Muhammad knew that there is no such place called Paradise or virgins or young boys in therein, for which his gullible but greedy Sahaba were rushed for. So, to give them immediate pleasure – which he himself believed in – he used to bury the martyrs in pairs in graves.

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 2: Book 23: Hadith 427 & 429 : The Prophet buried every two martyrs in of Uhud in one grave.

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 5: Book 59: Hadith 406 : Allah’s Apostle used to shroud two martyrs of Uhud in one sheet….”.

Some of his Sahaba were hated to see their loved one is being buried with the corps of other homosexual. So, they reacted against Muhammad’s deed and buried their relatives in separate graves:

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 2: Book 23: Hadith 434 & 435 : Narrated Jabir: A man was buried along with my father and I did not like it till I took him (i.e. my father) out and buried him in a separate grave.

muhammad-golden-door-1

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) slept with young men for 20 nights in his mosque

Our prophet’s house was separated by a partition wall from his Medina mosque. Although, he had a number of wives in the other side of his mosque (i.e., his house) along with similar number of servant (sex) girls, the holy prophet preferred to sleep with the young men in his mosque:

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 11: Hadith 604 & 653, Vol 8: Book 73: Hadith 37; Sahih Muslim: Book 4: Hadith 1423: We went to the Prophet and we were all young men and stayed with him for about twenty nights. ‘The prophet was very merciful!!’……”

(‘god’ alone knows how merciful that Muhammad was)

Prophet Muhammad used to sleep between two men

Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol 4:429: The Prophet said, “While I was at the House (Kaba) in a state midway between sleep and wakefulness, (an angel recognized me) as the man lying between two men…..”

(Hope our Prophet would have worn his undergarment…………., probably’!)

Allah (saw) promises Muslims with prepubescent pearl-like boys in paradise

Allah (swt) the Wise and Merciful knew the weakness (toward Sodomy & homosexuality) of His creation (especially Arab Muslims). So, he guaranteed in his Quran to grant us with prepubescent boys to fulfill our urge:

Quran, Al-Waaqia 56:17-23: Those in the Garden will be attended by immortal youths with wide, lovely eyes.

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was fond of buttocks

In his usual skill at delivering his messages in simplest form to reach his gullible followers, our holy prophet conveyed his message of how he paid attention to the buttocks of the kuffar women in this hadith:

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 9: Book 88: Hadith 232 : Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established till the buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daus move while going round Dhi-al-Khalasa.” Dhi-al-Khalasa was the idol of the Daus tribe which they used to worship in the pre-Islamic period of ignorance.

(We Muslim men should be are eagerly waiting to see the shaking hot buttocks of kuffar women as the signs of the Dooms Day)

Allah to sticking flags of unbelief on kuffars’ buttocks

Allah will insert flags to the buttocks of the wrongdoers on doomsday.

Sahih Muslim: Book 19: Hadith 4309 : It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag fixed behind the buttocks of every person guilty of the breach of faith.

Not interested in having sex with your wife for a period? Just imagine her buttock like your mother’s!

If a Muslim doesn’t like temporarily to have a sex (anal?) with one of his wives, he can take oath by saying “Your buttocks are similar to my mothers’” and stay away from her.

Abu Dawud/ Book 12/ Hadith 2207, 2212 & 2214 : Narrated Salamah ibn Sakhr al-Bayadi: I was a man who was more given than others to sexual intercourse with women. When the month of Ramadan came, I feared lest I should have intercourse with my wife, and this evil should remain with me till the morning. So I made my wife like my ‘MOTHER’S BACK’ to me till the end of Ramadan. But one night when she was waiting upon me, something of her was revealed (Quran/ Sura Al-Mujadila 58:2). Suddenly I jumped upon her. When the morning came I went to my people and informed them about this matter.

Quran verse 58:2 was revealed to allow Muslims to have sex from evening to early morning during Ramadan fasting. This shows how merciful our Allah is towards us Muslims. He even reveal a verse instantly to ease our sexual urges during the holy fasting month in Islam. My Muslim brethren should not feel bothered by bad-mouthing if the filthy Kafers about our religion. Comprehending the dept and meaning of these spiritual teachings of Islam are beyond their lowly intellect.

Umm Sulaim, the outstanding female companion of prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

I conclude this article with a shameful act of the sexually perverted Sahaba couple (Muhammad’s companions) and our beloved Prophet’s the shameless blessings to it:

Islamic scriptures never reveal the names of Muhammad’s female companions (Sahabiyaat). But there are few exceptions, because without them, it is not possible to complete those scriptures. Islamic scriptures name those consorts of our holy prophet with whom he had deepest intimacy. Umm Sulaim was one such intimate girlfriend of our noble prophet (pbuh).

Before going to that particular hadith, it will be worthwhile to know the extent of intimacy of Um Sulaim with our Prophet (pbuh). Here are some hadiths that will help us understand the level of intimacy between our Prophet and his married female Sahabi (female companion) Um Sulaim, wife of Abu Talha. Women in Islam are usually recognized by their father, husband or any of their male relatives. But Umm Sulaim’s husband and her son were recognized by herself. Here are the hadiths:

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 4: Book 52: Hadith 97/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 7: Book 62: Hadith 92 : Muhammad used to visit Umm Sulaim’s house very often, apart from his jumbo harem (nine to eleven wives at a time).

(May be our wise Prophet used to send her husband Abu Talha to some warfront on Jihad during his visit to her house).

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 8: Book 73: Hadith 170 & 221 : Muhammad used to compare Umm Sulaim with glass (i.e., too delicate to handle her).

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 11: Hadith 694/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 12: Hadith 830: The Prophet used to offer night prayer in Umm Sulaim’s house!

(How many rakah he performed? Allah knows best).

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 3: Hadith 132/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 5: Hadith 280/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 8: Book 73: Hadith 113 & 142 : Umm Sulaim clarified doubts about her wet dream (nocturnal sexual discharge) with prophet Muhammad (pbuh) without shyness.

( When everything is open, what is to kept secret?)

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 8: Book 74: Hadith 298: Umm Sulaim used to collect Muhammad’s sweat, while he was sleeping at her home, and used it as perfume.

(Allah knows best, from which part of Muhammad’s body, she has collected the sweat)

After reading the above hadiths anyone can assert about the characteristics and the bondage between a married woman Sahabi Umm Sulaim and our ‘noble’ Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). (Let us not forget to say PBUH – Peace be upon him, each time).

A real challenge to us, Muslims, to emulate this practice of this Sahaba couple and fulfill our prophet’s wish

Now, we are left with a hadith describing a most shameful sexual act between our prophet’s married companion couple, Abu Talha and Umm Sulaim, which will make the entire humanity feel ashamed. The beauty of this shameful hadith is that the narrator Anas bin Malik was the son of couple committing the act. Anas bin Malik was given to Muhammad by his mother Umm Sulaim as a servant when he was ‘young boy’. This boy was taking care of ‘all’ the needs of our Prophet (pbuh).

Sahih Muslim: Book 25: Hadith 5341: Anas b. Malik reported that the son of Abu Talha had been ailing. Abu Talha set out (on a journey) and his son breathed his last (in his absence). When Abu Talha came back, he said (to his wife): What about my child? Umm Sulaim (the wife of Abu Talha) said: He is now in a more comfortable state than before. She served him the evening meal and he took it. He then came to her (and had sexual intercourse with her) and when it was all over, she said: Make arrangements for the burial of the child. When it was morning. Abu Talha came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and informed him, whereupon he said: Did you spend the night with her. He said: Yes. He (the Holy Prophet) then said: O Allah, bless both of them (and as a result of blessing) she gave birth to a child……”.

It is a long hadith, and are few more hadiths on this subject. The child by name Abdullah, born to their intercourse while their dead child laying beside awaiting burial, became a Jihadi hero (martyr!!) in later days. So, my Muslim brethren! In case one of your child die, do not let the fortuitous opportunity pass by in grief. Instead, do have sex with your wife before your dead child is buried.

Abu Talha and Umm Sulaim would have been the worst example of human being on this planet to engage in sexual act near the corps of their little son awaiting burial. But the real question is: How come our holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) ask the couple whether they had intercourse in presence of the corps of their beloved child? What kind of a perverted person our holy prophet was? And do we Muslims dare to adopt this practice ourselves, which our noble Prophet (pbuh) wished us to do?

CONCLUSION: Though, it is a shameful act that the Saudi Sheikh was killed by a donkey while he allegedly attempted to sodomize it, our ‘Prophet’ Muhammad (pbuh) was no better as he used to spend his time with the married woman Umm Sulaim, especially when he had a jumbo pack of wives at home. And does he deserves to be called as a decent human being when he could ask his Sahaba couple if they had sex in front of the dead-body of their deceased child.

In this part, we have discussed about homosexuality and about few human buttocks. In Part 2 of this article, we will discuss about Muhammad’s ‘affections’ toward animals (especially the she-animals), and the domesticated animals, (i.e. women of Islam). I apologies for using this term about my Muslim sisters, but this is what what our beloved holy prophet called them as his farewell hajj sermon.

Tabari IX:113: “Treat women well for THEY ARE LIKE DOMESTIC ANIMALS WITH YOU and they do not possess anything themselves. Allah has made the enjoyment of their bodies lawful in his Qur’an.”

Posted on 21 Aug 14 by Sharia Unveiled

Hamas Vows to Kidnap More Israeli Soldiers (Video)


Posted by sharia unveiled on July 18, 2014

hamas-video-israeli-soldiers

A recent campaign by Hamas terrorist organization produced videos that aired on television illustrating the abduction of Israeli soldiers..

Hamas Vows to Kidnap More Israeli Soldiers:

Video courtesy of: MEMRI TV & Quoting Islam

Posted on 18 Jul 14 by Sharia Unveiled

OFFICIAL RELEASE: Statement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada in Response to the Situation in Israel


Originally posted on sharia unveiled:

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper 1 (resized)

PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA

STEPHEN HARPER

The following is an official release from:

The Office of Prime Minister Stephen Harper

re: In response to the situation in Israel

Prime Minister Stephen Harper today issued the following statement in response to the situation in Israel:

“The indiscriminate rocket attacks from Gaza on Israel are terrorist acts, for which there is no justification. It is evident that Hamas is deliberately using human shields to further terror in the region.

“Failure by the international community to condemn these reprehensible actions would encourage these terrorists to continue their appalling actions. Canada calls on its allies and partners to recognize that these terrorist acts are unacceptable and that solidarity with Israel is the best way of stopping the conflict.

“Canada is unequivocally behind Israel. We support its right to defend itself, by itself, against these terror attacks, and urge Hamas to immediately cease their…

View original 48 more words

The Vatican Falls for the ‘Interfaith’ Scam


Posted by sharia unveiled on June 28, 2014

vatican-muslims-2

14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?  2 Corinthians 6:14 King James (KJV)

by, Ned May / Baron Bodissey | FrontPage Mag | h/t Gates of Vienna

On June 8, 2014 — Pentecost Sunday — the Vatican hosted an “interfaith event” that included prayers by Christian priests, a Jewish rabbi, and a Muslim imam. The occasion was well-publicized in advance by the Holy See as a “pause in politics” that would promote peace between the Israel and the Palestinians.

During his visit to Israel and the Palestinian Authority the previous month, Pope Francis had invited Israeli President Shimon Peres and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to attend the event. Both leaders accepted the invitation, and sat with the Pope while prayers were said and chanted in the Vatican garden.

The imam, however, went beyond the script that had been handed to the Vatican in advance. He included in his chanted prayer verses 284-286 of Sura 2 in the Koran, the last part of which calls for Allah to grant the Muslims victory over the infidels. His words were broadcast live to a television audience, but they were in Arabic, so most non-Muslim viewers had no idea what he had said.

vatican-muslims-1

This apparently included the Vatican hierarchy. When someone who did understand Arabic pointed out what had happened, a Vatican spokesman at first denied that any such thing had occurred. Those verses weren’t in the advance script — how could he possibly have said them? No Muslim, especially a respected imam, would ever go back on his word!

Later, when that story became untenable, the Vatican soft-pedaled the added text, saying that there was nothing really wrong with it. To further complicate matters, a doctored tape of the Arabic prayer was released in which the final part of verse 2:286 was edited out. It’s not clear who did the editing, but the altered version certainly did serve the interests of the Vatican.

With the help of Vlad Tepes, I was able to track down a complete video of the prayer from an Arabic television channel and then have it translated (by a volunteer who prefers to remain anonymous) and subtitled. As far as I can determine, the imam’s name was never made public, either by the Vatican or the English-language Arab news sites. I’m told he’s Palestinian, and his distinctive headgear identifies him as having the authoritative credentials of Al-Azhar University:

A German-speaking Jesuit priest, Fr. Felix Körner, made a valiant effort to demonstrate that 2:286 was in full accord with Christian doctrine, and was peaceful in intent. During an interview he said (translated from the German by Rembrandt Clancy):

“This verse, perhaps spontaneously selected by someone who then also recited the Koran from memory, actually fitted very well into the overall context of the Prayer for Peace! There are always three steps in the three religions: We recognise the Creator and praise Him, we recognise our guilt and confess it and we plead for the gift of peace. And all that comes out very beautifully in these three verses of the Koran.

[…]

“There is a certain parallel insofar as a quotation torn out of context is particularly easily misunderstood. And if one removes from the text only the reference to unbelievers, one can easily use it as a peg upon which to hang something and then say that an infringement has taken place here. On the other hand we have in this case a Koran recitation which pertains to someone who not only quotes, but recites, and who also says: what I am reciting here is also what I believe. And in the same breath he is also saying: We Muslims, as the Koran precisely tells us, recognise the other religions with their prophets. Therefore from the Muslim side, there was by no means any deprecation or exclusion intended or expressed. Rather it was said: We are bringing here a religious idea, one which welcomes and accepts you all, and naturally in certain Koranic way, tries to set things right again. But there was nothing here which was meant to exclude or rebuff; rather a Koran verse was recited, which is meant to express the highest respect and therefore can also be received as such.” [emphasis added]

But is this interpretation true? Does Islam really “recognize the other religions with their prophets”? Was there really no “deprecation or exclusion intended”?

It’s always unwise to trust a non-Muslim’s interpretations of Islamic scripture and law. Our political are always telling us what Islam means — witness Boris Johnson, David Cameron, and George W. Bush — with less than complete credibility. Now we have a Jesuit priest telling us what Islam does and does not mean.

It’s also unwise to trust a Muslim cleric or spokesman when he explains Islam to a non-Muslim audience. There are very clear reasons for this skepticism, based in the Koran and the hadith (the sayings of Mohammed) and all major interpretations of Islamic law that are derived from those.

So how do we understand what happened at the Vatican on Pentecost Sunday?

We begin with this: last November a well-meaning Pope Francis issued a papal declaration, Evangelii Gaudium, which said among other things that “our respect for true followers of Islam should lead us to avoid hateful generalisations, for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.”

Now we’re going to take the advice of Major (ret.) Stephen Coughlin, one of the foremost non-Muslim experts on Islamic law in the United States. If we want to understand Islamic law, Maj. Coughlin tells us: “You must read things written by Muslims who are recognized in the Muslim community as experts in the topic they are writing about, and who are writing for a Muslim audience. If you fail to do that, you are not doing your job.”

Therefore, to provide context for the momentous events of June 8, the following information is instructive. It is derived from ’Umdat al-salik wa ’uddat al-nasik, which is commonly referred to as Reliance of the Traveller when cited in English. This an authoritative source on Sunni Islamic law, because it is certified as such by Al-Azhar University in Cairo. There is no higher authority on Sunni Islamic doctrine than Al-Azhar; it is the closest equivalent to the Vatican that can be found in Islam.

Consider this passage from Reliance of the Traveller, chapter O, o9.0:

Jihad means to wage war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad.

[…]

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus is such Koranic verses as:

•Fighting is prescribed for you (Koran 2:216)

•Slay them wherever you find them (Koran 4:89)

•Fight the idolators utterly (Koran 9:36)

In o9.8, Reliance of the Traveller describes the objectives of jihad:

The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)… and the war continues until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax…

Now it becomes clear that — contrary to what Fr. Körner said — Islam does indeed deprecate and exclude other religions, specifically including Judaism and Christianity. This deprecation and exclusion goes so far as to mandate warfare against those religions.

We should also bear in mind what Islamic law says about lying. In Book R “Holding One’s Tongue,” §r8.0 “Lying” at r8.2 “Permissible Lying,” Reliance of the Traveller cites the iconic Islamic legal jurist Imam Abu Hamid Ghazali:

This is an explicit statement that lying is sometimes permissible for a given interest… When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N: i.e., when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible) and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.

To sum up: according to an authoritative manual of Islamic law certified by Al-Azhar University — the same University that accredited the imam who prayed at the Vatican — the devout Muslim is obligated to make war against Christians and Jews until they convert to Islam, submit and pay the poll tax, or die.

Since this goal is obligatory, it is also obligatory for the devout Muslim to lie to Christians and Jews about what his religion means, and what it intends, if such lies help Islam achieve the final conquest.

This is why we are ill-advised to take Muslim spokesmen at their word when they describe the peaceful intentions of Islam.

Now hear what Maj. Stephen Coughlin has to say about what happened at the Vatican on Pentecost Sunday. He explains in great detail, using authoritative sources on Islamic law, what the imam was doing when he inserted those three extra verses into his prayer in the Vatican garden:

As you can see, Pope Francis and the leaders of the Catholic Church, not to mention the Jewish representatives from Israel, had the wool deftly pulled over their eyes by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The “interfaith” movement is a Muslim Brotherhood scam designed to soften up gullible Jews and Christians in advance of the inevitable Islamic victory.

The incident in the Vatican garden received very little Western media attention, even though it was one of the most important stories of the decade. We were all too busy paying attention to the more obvious jihad in Syria and Iraq, where Islam is reaching the same goal through fire and blood and slaughter.

What happened at the Vatican is understood (correctly) by Muslims as a great victory for Islam. Using stealth and deception, the Al-Azhar imam penetrated the innermost sanctum of Christendom and claimed it for the Umma.

 

source(‘s): http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ned-may/the-vatican-falls-for-the-interfaith-scam/

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/06/the-vatican-falls-for-the-interfaith-scam/#more-33602

Posted on 28 Jun 14 by Sharia Unveiled

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. Do not forget, according to the "Pope Prophecy" from Saint Malachi...pope 112 from after the prophecy was written was going to be the anti-Christ's false prophet...in studying the Bible's Book of Revelation, we find out the anti-Christ will be Muslim, which coincides with Islamic prophecies of their mahdi...(both the same entity) and the anti-Christ's world religion will be Chrislam...and the Pope is working now to merge Islam with Catholicism...]

ISIS Releases it’s 5-Year Territorial Expansion Plan


Posted by sharia unveiled on June 23, 2014

isis-map-5-year-plan

Map courtesy of: Ayman Mohyeldin | h/t Terri Lynn

Posted on 23 Jun14 by Sharia Unveiled

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. And this doesn't entail the subvert takeover of Western countries...

How can people believe the white washed version of Islam when they state that Islam is peaceful and tolerant...do people think that one can take over multiple countries in five years by just preaching or asking, or do people want to be politically correct (reality shows, PC is in actuality dhimminess, ask Mohammed), or are they just stupid and don't want to rile up the Muslims, for fear of death? you decide.

Sad thing is...the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (Syria) were a part of al-Qaeda, which was created by the Muslim Brotherhood as one of their military arms...the al-Qaeda are primarily Sunni (which aren't as aggressive as the Shia, but they will still kill infidels and Kufars without much hesitance), where the Iraq is primarily Shia (which are more aggressive because they look more at the mahdi coming back and the Shia will be at the top of the list of "good works" in satan's I mean allah's eyes.

This rift between the the Shia and the Sunni could possibly be the feet in Nebuchadnezzar's dream. You see, in verses 41-43 in Daniel 2, it talks about the feet being of "mixed" with clay and iron. Now, something to put together (not saying this the a God given interpretation,  but one of my thinking, the Book of Daniel was written in Aramaic, and in the Aramaic mixed was translated from the word "ereb". Ereb, in Aramaic, according to the Strong's Hebrew Lexicon 6151 and 6152, is Arab. Now the thought to gander here is, the iron in the feet could mean Shia Muslims, because they are like iron when performing oppression and terrorism according to what allah and Mohammed said to do, verses the mirey clay the Shia are mixed with, which could be the "not as aggressive" Sunni. They do not fully get along with each other...case in point...ISIS and al-Qaeda...they started out to be working together, but they separated for differences in religious beliefs.]

Digging Out the Graves of Non-Muslims for Vengeance or Looting – A ‘Holy’ Tradition of Prophet Muhammad


Posted by sharia unveiled on June 6, 2014

A Christian Cemetery in Britain, desecrated by Muslims.

A Christian Cemetery in Britain, desecrated by Muslims.

by, Mirza Ghalib | Islam Watch

Recently a Christian father in Egypt was murdered in broad daylight on the street in front of his son by the followers of the ‘religion of peace’. The killing itself didn’t become big news for the world community, as if it is the right of Muslims to oppress and kill non-Muslims in Muslim-majority countries. However, the incident became a news only after the Muslim barbarians did the unimaginable:They dug out the corpse of the murdered Christian father from his grave, dragged it through the streets, and mutilated it.

This incident will certainly be shocking to non-Muslims. It will also be shocking to most of the ignorant Muslims, who bang their heads five times a day, without ever knowing much about their ‘religion’. But had they known Islam, the ‘Religion of peace’, well enough, this incident would not have been shocking or unusual to them. It is indeed a Sunnah, the holy tradition of Prophet Muhammad, left to his followers to emulate for the eternity to come. There are many incidents during the prophet’s time recorded in Sahih Hadiths, wherein Muslims dug out the corpse of non-Muslims from graves as a vengeance or for looting.

Digging out corpse of Muhammad’s rebellious Christian scribe from grave

It was impossible for illiterate Muhammad with a bunch of illiterate and low-class companions to fabricate a holy like the Quran for deceiving the Arabs. So he sought guidance and help from a few educated and knowledgeable Christian and Jewish scribes to write for him his ‘holy’ book by plagiarizing from other scriptures. Beyond that, his dominant method of converting the people was either bribing or terrorizing them. One such Christian scribe later on left him and used to say: “Muhammad knows nothing but what I have written for him”. Muhammad spared nobody who satirized or criticized him, be they men or women, young or old, free or slave. Soon after the rebellious Christian scribe said those things about Muhammad, he was ‘mysteriously’ dead. Whether or not Muhammad’s hand was behind his death, Muhammad certainly did not allow dead-body to ‘rest in peace’ in grave because of his exposing of Muhammad’s embarrassing secrets. After he was buried, the followers of the holy prophet dug out his dead-body repeatedly from his grave until the relatives of the deceased man became fed up and left the body unattended. Here are the hadiths:

Narrated Anas: There was a Christian who embraced Islam and read Surat-al-Baqara and Al-Imran, and he used to write (the revelations) for the Prophet. Later on he returned to Christianity again and he used to say: “Muhammad knows nothing but what I have written for him.” Then ALLAH CAUSED HIM TO DIE, and the people buried him, but in the morning they saw that THE EARTH HAD THROWN HIS BODY OUT. They said, “This is the act of Muhammad and his companions. They dug the grave of our companion and took his body out of it because he had run away from them.” They again dug the grave deeply for him, but in the morning they again saw that the earth had thrown his body out. They said, “This is an act of Muhammad and his companions. They dug the grave of our companion and threw his body outside it, for he had run away from them.” They dug the grave for him as deep as they could, but in the morning they again saw that the earth had thrown his body out. So they believed that what had befallen him was not done by human beings and had to leave him thrown (on the ground). (Sahih Al-Bukhari: 4:56:814)

Anas b. Malik reported: There was a person amongst us who belonged to the tribe of Bani Najjar and he recited Sura al-Baqarah and Surat Al-i-‘Imran and he used to transcribe for Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him). He ran away as a rebel and joined the People of the Book. They gave it much importance and said: He is the person who used to transcribe for Muhammad and they were much pleased with him. Time rolled on that ALLAH CAUSED HIS DEATH. They dug the grave and buried him therein, but they found to their surprise that the earth had thrown him out over the surface. They again dug the grave for him and buried him but the earth again threw him out upon the surface. They again dug the grave for him and buried him but the earth again threw him out upon the surface. At last they left him unburied. (Sahih Muslim/ Book 38/ Hadith 6693)

Please refer to the following hadiths for similar killing orders of other scribes issued by Muhammad. (Sunan Abu Dawud/ Hadith: 2677, 4345 & 4346)

Muhammad’s digging out corpse of the rightful Medina leader, Abdullah ibn Ubay

In another similar incident, Muhammad’s showed his most evil mind by digging out the corpse of his another opponent, Abdullah ibn Ubay, for spitting into dead Abdullah’s mouth. Abdullah was the leader of the city of Medina when Muhammad migrated there. He was of noble birth, and abhorrent toward violence and inclined to peace and justice. As Muhammad’s Muslim gang grew fast after he started raiding and plundering for making a leaving and offered booty to bribe those who would join him, Abdullah became sidelined from the leadership position. He even had to convert to Islam outwardly, but remained respectable in Medina until his death. He opposed Muhammad’s most barbaric actions, often saving thousands of lives from Muhammad’s slaughter—the Banu Qainuqa and Nadir Jews, for example. Barbaric as he was, Muhammad naturally hated him intensely until he died, and showed his hatred toward Abdullah in the most horrifying way in how he dealt with Abdullah’s buried corpse:

Narrated Jabir: The Prophet came to (the grave of) ‘Abdullah bin Ubai after his body was buried. The body was brought out and then the Prophet put his saliva over the body and clothed it in his shirt. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 2:23:360)

Jabir reported Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) came to the grave of ‘Abdullah b. Ubayy, brought him out from that, placed him on his knee and put his saliva in his mouth and shrouded him in his own shirt and Allah knows best. (Sahih Muslim/ Book 38/ hadith 6678)

Readers can learn more about Abdullah ibn Ubay from this article: Death of Noble Abdullah bin Ubayy and the Extreme Meanness of Prophet Muhammad.

MUHAMMAD LOOTED THE GRAVES OF RICH NON-MUSLIMS

Muhammad not only looted the non-Muslims caravans and communities for making a living, but also plundered the graves of rich non-Muslims after their death. The readers may feel stunned to learn about incredible incident:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-’As: When we went out along with the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) to at-Ta’if we passed a grave. I heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: This is the grave of Abu Righal. He was in this sacred mosque (sanctuary) protecting himself (from punishment). When he came out, he suffered the same punishment which his people suffered at this place, and he was buried in it. The sign of it is that a golden bough was buried with him. If you dig it out, you will find it with him. The people hastened to it and took out the bough. (Abu Dawud/ Book 13/ hadith 3082)

Muhammad justifies his digging of graves for looting by blaming the Jews

To water down or justify his most shameful deeds, Muhammad had to invent lies to put the blames on non-Muslims:

Narrated Rabi bin Hirash: ……….Uqba bin ‘Amr said, “I heard him (Muhammad) saying that the Israeli used to dig the grave of the dead (to steal their shrouds).” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 4:56:659)

What an evil genius that Muhammad was!

MUHAMMAD BUILT HIS MADINA MOSQUE CUM HOUSE ON THE GRAVES OF NON-MUSLIMS

Let us end this article with another shameful incident of Muhammad’s disrespect toward the graves of non-Muslims. Even today, Saudi Arabia has millions of square kilometers of unused barren land, and yet he chose to construct his Medina mosque and the living quarters for his community on the burial ground of Banu Najjar, one of the Jewish tribes that living in Medina when Muhammad arrived there. Muhammad ordered to dig out the corpses of deceased Banu Najjar men and women from their graves and built his mosque and living quarter upon it. This is the way Muhammad showed his gratitude toward Banu Najjar, in whose city his community found refuge in times of desperation. There are many hadiths speaks about this incident:

Narrated Anas: The Prophet came to Medina and ordered a mosque to be built and said, “O Bani Najjar! Suggest to me the price (of your land).” They said, “We do not want its price except from Allah” (i.e. they wished for a reward from Allah for giving up their land freely). So, the Prophet ordered the graves of the pagans to be dug out and the land to be leveled, and the date-palm trees to be cut down. The cut date-palms were fixed in the direction of the Qibla of the mosque. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:8:420/3:30:92/ 5:58:269) & (Sahih Muslim: Book4: Hadith1068)

CONCLUSION

Unless Muslims study their sacred religious scriptures and understands the evil teachings and personality of Prophet Muhammad, and the world wakes up to the reality of Islam, and understand how the age-old barbarism of Islam—temporarily in hibernation—is being revived over the past few decades, the future of our children and grandchildren is doomed. The challenge is right in front of us.

The Continued Desecration of Christian Graves at St. Johns Church in Manchester, England:

Video of the continued disrespect by Muslims shown to the Christian dead during an ongoing church to mosque conversion.

Video courtesy of: British Nationalist & Patriot

Posted on 6 Jun 14 by Sharia Unveiled

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: