• October 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Sep    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Truth about Islam and Shari’a law

  • Blog Stats

    • 64,489 hits
  • Must Read! Click Picture!

  • Must Read: click picture!

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 32 other followers

  • Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

    Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

  • We love & support Israel!!!

  • Get Educated & Educate Others!! Click the Picture!

    CLICK THIS PICTURE!!!

  • NO TOLERANCE FOR INTOLERANCE, NO APOLOGY FOR BEING FREE!!!

  • Key Strategies for the Counter Jihad!

    Click on image above - read about strategies!

Muslim from U.S. killed fighting for ISIS


In a sea of bad news…American ISIS fighter Abu Muhammad al-Amriki ‘killed in Kobani’ | Daily Mail Online. h/t Atlas

Abu Muhammad al-Amriki, who reportedly lived in the U.S. before joining the terror group, has been ‘martyred’ in the border town of Kobani, according to internet posts by militants.

In a video posted on YouTube in February, a bearded man believed by officials to be the same individual was seen speaking in English with a heavy foreign accent.

Dressed in uniform and clutching a rifle, he said he had lived in America for around 10 years before travelling to Syria to join ISIS. It is unclear whether he was a U.S. citizen.

1413348888639_wps_100_ak_47_aloft_his_right_han

Posted on 20 Oct 14 by Creeping Sharia

Psalms 83 Prophecy


[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. This is what will happen in the future….Psalms 83 goes on as being just a lament psalm that was concerning the Israelites written by Asaf, a lot of theologians…some look at it as a war that will come to pass soon. Some believe it will be a war that will happen with Israel and the neighboring Arab/Muslim countries, including Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, NW Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and the Palestinian people.

Some believe that the only war with Muslim countries against Israel will be the Ezekiel 38-39 (Gog and Magog) war. What a lot of folks that only believe in the Ezekiel 38 war is that the nations involved in this war are different from the Psalms 83 war. The nations involved in the Ezekiel 38 war are Russia, a few Muslim countries located in Russia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Sudan, Libya, Austria and Germany, Turkey.

The Muslim countries surrounding Israel in the Psalms 83 war do not show up in the Ezekiel 38/39 war…wonder why? Well because in Psalm 83 war, the militaries will be destroyed…if you look at it, Jordan is on the verge of being taken over by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB)(the MB wants to rule Jordan), Lebanon is on the same because of the MB wanting to rule that country as well. Syria is under the same civil war problem…the MB has already started the civil war that is currently going on…because the MB wanted to rule that country as well…proof, the Syrian Freedom Fighters were verified as primarily Al Qaeda members (and, as you know if you’ve been reading my blogs, as well as other anti Islamic type, educational blogs). Egypt had an MB dictator in office for a year or so, but then he got removed…however the MB is doing what they can to get him, or another MB operative back in office, and I am sure it will work. And with Iraq and Syria full of the MB’s newest creation, Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, it is pretty much unmistakable to know that they are going to attack Israel. And with the help of the MB’s first military arm in the Israeli area, Hamas (which is made up of primarily Palestinians, which are, according to the study of Hermeneutics, the Palestinians descended from the Philistines. Now the North West part of Saudi Arabia, even though right now it looks like they are in peace, what you have to remember is that fact that the Saudis are in the Qur’an groove, and follow Shari’a…so even though they look peaceful, deep inside they have a hatred towards the Islamic “Little Satan”.

This is the setup of the Psalms 83 war. When you look at the scripture, you will find that after the Muslim “council”, they will jointly attack Israel, and upon being greatly beaten, the nation of Israel will become lax and will drop most of its attentiveness and feel safe….they will let down their guard. That is where Ezekiel 38/39 comes in…when Israel is comfortable with it’s neighboring Muslim, anti-Semitic countries at bay, then the big battle of Gog and Magog will come in, where Russia will lead the attack…

This is where, once again, the true God, Hashem, El Shaddai will defend Israel…this is being geared up to happen soon.

Total Strategic Incoherence


By JG October 15, 2014

kerry-300x173

Enough Americans have a solid understanding of the threats our nation currently faces that the perspective of history is unnecessary for us to recognize – in the moment – that our leadership is catastrophically unprofessional in their national security duties, and we have now achieved a level of strategic incoherence never before seen in recorded history.

America’s enemies are telling us exactly who they are and what they intend to do.  In many cases, they are putting it right in our faces. Yet our leaders at the federal level continue to ignore the clearly articulated plans of those who wish to destroy us in exchange for the unmitigated fantasy that we can convince others to like us, as well as those inside our government who are intentionally sabotaging this nation in an effort to destroy it.  The latter will not be addressed here as it has been detailed in previous UTT articles.

Across continents, Islamic armies are butchering non-Muslims and Muslims who will not comply with the Sharia or whom are guilty of crimes under Sharia. These groups call themselves Boko Haram, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Abu Sayyaf, Al Shabaab, and a variety of others all of whom state their objective is to impose Sharia globally under the Islamic State or Caliphate. This is the same stated objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, Tabligi Jamaat, Jamaat e Islami, and every Muslim nation on earth at the Head of State and King level via the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) Ten Year Plan. This also happens to be the same stated objective of every jihadi arrested in Europe, the United States, and everywhere else on the planet. It is also a fact that 100% of all published Sharia (Islamic Law) mandates jihad until the entire world is ruled by Sharia under the Caliphate, and all (100%) published Islamic Law only defines “jihad” as “warfare” against non-Muslims.

The Islamic enemy is completely unified in their stated objectives, yet the entire U.S. Government leadership from the President, to his National Security Advisor, to the heads of the CIA, FBI, DHS, and Military, and the Cabinet Secretaries all march in unison stating none of this has to do with Islam. From this grotesque lack of intellectual and factual honesty come strategic blunders that leave a person speechless.

The President states ISIS is “not Islamic” yet continues to support the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas, Al Qaeda forces and others in places like Syria and Libya.  Secretary of State Kerry stated before Congress recently that “(ISIS is) the enemy of Islam. That’s what they are.  There’s nothing in Islam that condones or suggests people should go out and rape women and sell off young girls or give them as gifts to jihadists and, you know, cut people’s heads off.”  Apparently, neither has read Islamic Law which explicitly calls for these things.  As a matter of fact, beheadings and crucifixion are part of the Hadud Laws which are specifically articulated in the Quran.

The President and his Chief of Staff (former Deputy National Security Advisor), FBI Director, Director of Central Intelligence, Secretary of Homeland Security, and others continue to look to Muslim Brotherhood leaders in America to give them their info on Islam and Sharia, as well as allowing these jihadis to write doctrine for domestic counterterrorism strategy and foreign policy – which is why our leaders are clueless. This cluelessness allows our enemies to extract the very outcome they are gunning for – complete strategic incoherence.  When the FBI fails in these duties, state and local law enforcement officials are left out to dry.

The catastrophic strategic results speak for themselves:

* The U.S. Department of State wrote the Constitutions for Iraq and Afghanistan which created Islamic Republics (not democracies) under Sharia law – thus fulfilling Al Qaeda’s objectives for the region.  Despite crushing our enemies on the field of battle, the U.S. lost these wars.  Today, Americans and those who gave their blood and bodies for this cause watch as the gains made are being washed away by a different flavor of the same enemy.

* The U.S. government takes sides with “moderate” Islamic groups without understanding the strategic implications, and our government ends up supporting Al Qaeda and/or Muslim Brotherhood entities with arms and money in Libya, Syria, and Egypt.

* The U.S. Government via the President and Secretary of State negotiate with hostile nations/entities like the Taliban, Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, and others thinking we can cajole them into seeing the issues our way. All the while we are completely ignorant that their guiding principles are enshrined in Sharia, a body of law they believe must be obeyed above all other laws and systems. Therefore, we are always on the losing side of these discussions.

* Those on the front lines of this war go into harm’s way unclear about the threat, the enemy threat doctrine (Sharia), and how to dialogue with the enemy until they gain practical experience on the ground. Since primary Muslim Brotherhood organizations like ISNA, CAIR, MAS, and others have been given access to military units and our war colleges by the Pentagon and commanding generals, our military is not only being kept from a factual understanding of the enemy, they are the target of information operations by our enemy to specifically keep them from knowing the enemy.

* When senior generals do speak out, it is to silence the factual basis for identifying and understanding the enemy. It is the reason our leaders obliged our military to dangerously absurd rules of engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan, and why senior Pentagon officials ordered the soldiers at Guantanamo Bay guarding the jihadists to carry Qur’ans for prisoners wearing white gloves and treat the Quran like a “delicate piece of art.”  This nonsense has no place in a war, but is the logical result of our leadership’s failure to get a clear understanding of what this nation is facing.

* The U.S. military continues to train foreign personnel in Islamic countries yet cannot understand why these same “friends” would kill our troops in acts of jihad (martyrdom).

* There is no understanding of the implications of the US v Holy Land Foundation trial (Dallas, 2008), the largest terrorism financing and Hamas trial in U.S. history – inside our federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Therefore, senior Muslim Brotherhood leaders and organizations continue to support jihadi operations, recruit and “radicalize” jihadis, and influence and conduct counterintelligence operations inside our national security apparatus.  They do this almost completely unimpeded.

*Our counterintelligence programs do not blend well with the counterterrorism programs in either the CIA or FBI and, therefore, we do not see – strategically – the meshing of foreign intelligence services, their political representatives here, and the jihadi operations. Saudi Arabia is an excellent example of this. The Saudi government was complicit in 9/11, as was the Saudi Ambassador to the U.S. and members of Saudi intelligence. Saudi Arabia supports terrorism more than any other nation on the planet beside Iran – yet they continue to be given a free pass by the U.S. government.

* U.S. Attorney’s Offices across the country partner with Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas entities to train their employees, as well as FBI and DHS employees, despite facts already in evidence (US v HLF).

* Since 2012 when the FBI Director, DHS Secretary, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Dempsey shut down all training inside the government about the Muslim Brotherhood, the HLF trial, Islamic Law (Sharia), the strategic threat from the global Islamic Movement and related topics, the impact on international operations and investigations has been severe. The FBI’s latest threat matrix does not even include Islamic terrorism as a major threat to the United States. This defies rational thought. These days Chairman Dempsey publicly states his concern for ISIS, but fails to recognize it is his own policy of silencing the facts and truth inside the Pentagon that has led to a strategic collapse of fundamental war fighting mantras like “know thy enemy.”  The question he must be asked when he makes statements that Islam does not support what Al Qaeda and ISIS are doing is: “What Islamic Law have you read General?”

* Congressmen Gerry Connolly, Keith Ellison, Andre Carson John Conyers and Senators like Richard Durbin and others have given public support, using their official office, and, in some cases, raised money for MB/Hamas in the U.S. doing business as “CAIR.”  Yet, this behavior, which is against U.S. law, is left unchallenged by the Department of Justice.

There are those who have argued that it is difficult and nearly impossible to speak truth inside the system today, and that is true.  However, the Oath of Office obliges all in positions of authority to give their fidelity to the Constitution, not to their jobs or their promotions.

But this strategic incoherence is certainly not limited to the Islamic threat.

The Iranians are forging ahead with their nuclear program openly stating they will destroy Israel when capable.

The Chinese and the Iranians have been conducting joint Naval exercises while the Chinese intelligence service is eating our lunch by penetrating U.S. government systems on a regular basis and conducting economic warfare against us at unprecedented levels.

The Chinese and the Russians have taunted the U.S. on a number of occasions with provocative actions including a Russian bomber flying over Guam during the President’s State of the Union Speech last year.  The Chinese popped one of their subs up in the middle of a U.S. Naval exercise recently just to show us they can.

Our strategic response – nothing.

In fact, our military and civilian leaders publicly state our greatest threat is “global warming.”

Message to our enemies – “We are weak and will not respond to aggressive action.”

The historical result of such weakness and appeasement has always been grave violence to the nation demonstrating such weakness.

Our allies do not trust us and our enemies do not fear us. We are extremely vulnerable.

And this is not the worst of it. The utter catastrophic failure by our leaders to have a working knowledge of our enemies and their doctrine has resulted in the deaths of Americans abroad and at home. Equally devastating is the loss of the security of communities across this nation which will – because of the failure of our leaders – have to deal with the jihadis on the streets of America in coming months in ways most people find unimaginable.  This is a threat that can be mitigated now, and needs to be.  Every day we wait is another level of security we are losing.

The way in which the government is dealing with the threat from Ebola – while ISIS calls for it to be used as a strategic weapon against us – gives us a glimpse into the lack of leadership, basic intellectual acumen, and the vacuum of common sense in those men and women charged with defending our nation at the top.

There is no other outcome than the defeat of America when the entire American leadership structure on both sides of the political aisle fails to identify the enemy and make  complete victory our national objective.

Anything less will  leave the world without the lamp on the hill shining the light of liberty.

Posted on 15 Oct 14 by Understanding The Threat

Recent Raid Yields ‘ISIS Manifesto: 100-Year Plan for a World Khilafah’


Posted by sharia unveiled on October 14, 2014

 

The United Sunni States: 2114

isis-khilafah-7-1

by, Terrorism Research and Analysis Consortium | RT News

In March 2014, the home of an Islamic State (IS) commander was raided by Iraqi Special Forces. Among the items found in the residence was a manifesto written by what appears to be the Islamic State Cabinet Member, Abdullah Ahmed al-Meshedani, aka Abu Kassem. Reportedly the director of foreign fighter and suicide bomber transport, little is known about al-Meshedani’s present life. Based on these documents, however, TRAC analysts have garnered a rare glimpse not only into his vision for the Islamic State but also the Islamic State’s current and future plans.

As much mystery that surrounds the Islamic State, there is equally as much complexity that surrounds this manifesto. Signed off on the final page by Abu Kassem’s alias “al-Mashhadani al-Iraqi,” the document reads like a hybrid between Islamic State goals and ex-Baathist and Republican Guard concepts left over from Saddam Hussein’s era.  The documents are extremely well written with a high command of Arabic often reserved for and used by accomplished scholars. The writings are not necessarily religious but show a mastery of military knowledge and Arab nationalism.

ONE HUNDRED YEARS ONWARD

The copy of Abu Kassem’s manifesto that TRAC holds is merely a portion of the original work; thirteen pages are in tact, spanning from page 19 to page 40; some sections were missing or too blurred to decipher.  Beginning on page 19, the document has three distinct topics that intertwine to create an unprecedented insight into the Islamic State’s policy, economics and goals. What is particularly of note is the manner in which the Islamic State views itself both in the near and long term.  The term “United Sunni States” is a reference to these goals that cross into a hundred years in the future and include seventy (70) objectives.

isis-100-year-plan-khilafah-2

Another area of interest is how the manifesto is presented and shared.  Unlike the previous declarations found at the home of Islamic State Cabinet member and Baghdadi’s Head of the Military Council, Adnan Ismael Najim Abdulla al-Dulaimi aka Abu Abdul Rahman al-Bilawi’s residence, which were found on a thumb drive, Abu Kassem’s work was printed out.  Once spiral bound, the manifesto is typed and chaptered, demonstrating this document was clearly meant for a distribution among the entire Islamic State senior staff.

ABU KASSEM’S MANIFESTO CHAPTERS:

  • The General Leadership and the nature of the relationship between the military and political wings
  • The Ideological Leadership of the movement, its relationship with the General Leadership and society
  • Economic Institutions – Resources and Industries
  • The Economic Assets of the Sunni Entity
  • We are the Campaign of the Banners and we are the new Umayyads
  • The great Safavid enterprise… The challenges of war and the tools of Arab defence (The 100 Year Plan)
  • How we will establish our war against the great Safavid enterprise
  • The obstacles of establishing the project

Though this is a partial work, the potential new understandings of the Islamic State gained from Abu Kassem are of paramount importance.

- – -

The Russian-Iranian Nuclear Ambition:

An alleged policy plan of the Islamic State outlines some chilling, if unrealistic, plots of the would-be terrorist state, including bribing Russia with access to oilfields in exchange for nuclear technology, and digging a canal across the UAE.

The document reported by Britain’s Sunday Times is believed to have been written by Abdullah Ahmed Meshedani, a member of the highly secretive six-man war cabinet of the terrorist group, which wants to build an Islamist state, or caliphate, in parts of Iraq and Syria.

It was captured by Iraqi special forces during a March raid on the home of a senior Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) member and confirmed as authentic by Western security officials.

The 70-point plan provides an insight into the grandiose, if somewhat far-fetched, strategy aimed at undermining Shiites in the Arab world and Iran as that branch of Islam’s powerhouse nation.

One of the goals listed in the documents is to offer Russia access to oilfields in Iraq’s Anbar province in exchange for Moscow severing ties with Tehran and sharing secret nuclear technology known to Iran with the IS.

The bribe is also meant to convince the Russian government to stop supporting Syrian President Bashar Assad and ally with Sunni states of the Arab Gulf in their confrontation with Iran and Syria.

isis-khilafah-3

A security source familiar with the document told the newspaper, “Nothing shocks Western governments these days in relation to ISIS and its fanatical aspirations.

“We’ve known and feared for some time that they want to obtain chemical and nuclear weapons… So when you place their future aspirations against their current achievements, this document which purports to be the group’s manifesto does stop and make you think.”

Another bizarre plan to undermine Iran’s powerbase involves building a canal across the United Arab Emirates “like the Panama Canal in America’s hands,” which would allow oil tankers travel to and from the Persian Gulf, bypassing the Iran-controlled Strait of Hormuz, the newspaper reports.

In addition to the Iranian nuclear program, the document suggests hitting its caviar industry “because it is a national treasure,” and urges to flood the carpet market with products of Afghan carpet makers to cripple their Iranian competitors.

The IS also envisions itself as a regional naval power, with bases built on islands bought from Yemen and the Comoros.

Domestically, the self-proclaimed state has a program of ethnic cleansing, eugenic programs, assassinations of defectors – including IS officials – and other brutal policies that would ensure a population united in purpose, according to the document.

 The caliphate’s security for foreign forces would be provided by targeted hits on senior officials and officers in Iran and Iraq as well as attacks of any armed Shiite groups.

In the long run, the IS wants Sunnis from Pakistan and Syria to migrate to lands with mixed Sunni-Shiite populations, “marry early and have many children,” who would become the core of a future extermination campaign to wipe out Shiites in the Gulf.

The IS “are not focused on merely supporting themselves with ransom activities and oil theft, they know that in order to survive they have to generate income in legitimate ways,” Veryan Khan, director of Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium, a US-based terrorism monitoring group, told the Sunday Times.

“I am convinced this was passed out among senior personnel of Islamic State,” she added. “To fully explain a 100-year plan is completely unique — they are proving that they are visionaries to the rest of the senior staff.”

Posted on 14 Oct 14 by Sharia Unveiled

ISIS in Biblical Prophetic Perspective…Hal Lindsey


[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. I wanted to pass this on, being a Reverend myself, I wanted to pass on some Bible prophecy about these end times.

I feel with my studies and with the studies of other great ministers, that the anti-Christ (AC) will be Islamic, the Bible actually points to this…in fact, in Nebuchadnezzar’s statue from the dream…when interpreted, the Book of Daniel, written in Aramaic originally, states the feet are made of iron and miry clay or mixed with iron and clay…in the Aramaic language, mixed is translated as race or population/populace… (ḥlwṭ, ḥlwṭʾ (ḥaluwṭ ) n.m. mixed populace). After reading the Law, the Jews realized that it was prohibited to have taken the peoples from the surrounding nations for their wives. Specifically mentioned are the Ammonites and the Moabites. These were both descendants of Esau who lived in what is today the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The King James Version more accurately translates the phrase “all who were of foreign descent” as “the mixed multitude”. Again here, as in Daniel, this specific phrase “mixed multitude” in the Hebrew is ereb or ay’-reb. Again, Aramaic was the language that was spoken by the Jews at the time of Nehemiah. As such, this word was more than likely Arab. And so the verse was essentially saying, “When the people heard this law, they excluded from Israel all who were of Arab descent.” The point in all of this is that in the ancient near east, the word mixed and Arab were essentially synonymous. The very name Arab in its etymological origins refers to the mixed people that lived primarily to the east of Israel.

Now, in Revelation, and Zechariah, we get the colors of horses and chariots. These colors are reflect the end times with the Seals being opened…you know the horses and what they represent…problem is that too many people follow an incorrect teaching from the “Reformers” by thinking that the AC will be the Pope…this is very incorrect…because there is a prophecy that the 112 th pope from the 1139 prophecy would be the false prophet (FP) for the AC. This would put our current Pope, Pope Francis as the FP…if you look at what he is doing…he is trying to merge Islam (which was actually created, at least the beginning, by the Roman Catholic Church to help rid them of Jews and non-Catholic Christians) with the Catholic Church. If you look up the Prophecy of the Popes, it will state that in 1590 the Vatican deemed it a forgery…however; 100% of the prophecy has come to pass, before and after the 1590 forgery statement…

Now, another thing that is wrongly put in the Bible is that one of the horses is colored “Pale”. This is grossly incorrect because the in the Greek (the original text the New Testament was written in) tells us the color was chloros…which is actually green…chloros is the Greek root from which we get the word ‘Chlorophyll’ and Chlorine.

Well, enough of the Bible study…just keep in mind, the Muslims vow and chant they will take over the world, the Bible shows the AC will take over the world, the Muslim population is working on what the AC will do as far as beheadings, and killing…they will take over the majority of the world, but will lose it all…

[Graphic] Alleged ISIS Fighter Caught Committing Bestiality. Does The Quran Allow This?


Dom The Conservative 10/09/2014

livestock

A graphic leaked video allegedly shows an Islamic State fighter having intercourse with a donkey.

The act of bestiality was reportedly caught by a U.S. military drone, although this is unconfirmed since leaking military footage without permission is a federal offense.

It’s unknown where the graphic encounter takes place, but is believed to have been videotaped by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan.

Humans having sex with animals, especially livestock, is not uncommon in the Middle East, but is it permissible or punishable in Islam?

Although the Quran vehemently prohibits homosexuality, adultery, or even marriage of Muslims to non-Muslims, there isn’t one scripture that denounces sex with other species.

However, the Sahih Hadith, a collection of teachings of the prophet Muhammad, does clearly state that bestiality is permissible, aside from condoning rape and pedophilia:

Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully.

If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.

Islamic Scholars also permit the act:

“If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj (trip to Mecca) void.”(Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216)

“Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur.” (Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820)

Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal (permissible) but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner. (al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani)

To understand why such perversity is prevalent in Muslim culture, referring to the Quran and Hadith reveal many times that this is religiously permitted or commanded.

Posted on 9 Oct 14 by Universal Free Press

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. There is a rebuttal from Muslims that the death penalty will be placed upon a Muslim that does the deed with an animal per ONE hadith…but Sam Shamoun and his crew spell out that the hadith in question is (as verified by the majority of Muslims I have talked with) an invalid hadith and not many trust it nor follow it…this is from Sam Shamoun…

 

Death Penalty for Bestiality

There is nothing about the punishment for bestiality in Muwatta, Bukhari or Muslim. We find some ahadith on the subject in books of Abu Da`ud, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, and Ahmad and, of these muhaddithun those who do express opinions on the authenticity of ahadith they record, do not have a favorable opinion of these particular ahadith.

There is essentially one hadith prescribing death penalty for bestiality:

 ‘Abd Allah bin Muhammad al-Nufayli related to us: ‘Abd al-‘Aziz bin Muhammad related to us: ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr related to me from ‘Ikrimah from Ibn ‘Abbas that the Messenger of God said: “If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him.” (‘Ikrimah) said: “I asked him (Ibn ‘Abbas): ‘Why the animal?’ He replied: ‘I think (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it’.” Abu Da`ud said, This is not strong.  (Abu Da`ud 3871)

Narrations of this hadith with variations are also found in Tirmidhi (1374), Ibn Majah (2554), and Musnad Ahmad (2294, 2591). They all are narrated from ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr from ‘Ikrimah from Ibn ‘Abbas. One narration in Ahmad comes from ‘Abbad bin Mansur instead of ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr but in that narration the Prophet is not mentioned and the words quoted are understood to be the words Ibn ‘Abbas:

 ‘Abd al-Wahhab related to us: ‘Abbad bin Mansur informed us from ‘Ikrimah from Ibn ‘Abbas that concerning the one who has sex with an animal he said: “kill the fa`il and maf`ul bihi”. (Ahmad 2597)

But in al-Hakim a narration from the same ‘Abbad bin Mansur from ‘Ikrimah in which the saying of Ibn ‘Abbas becomes a hadith of the Prophet:

 From ‘Abbad bin Mansur from ‘Ikrimah from Ibn ‘Abbas that he mentioned (dhakara) the Prophet that concerning the one who has sex with an animal he said: “kill the fa`il and maf`ul bihi” (Al-Hakim, quoted from ‘Awn al-Ma‘bud 3869).

Note that this narration is the same as the one from Ahmad except for the words, “he mentioned the Prophet”. These words are awkward and vague, not clearly stating that the death penalty was prescribed by the Prophet. They are a timid attempt to turn a view attributed to Ibn ‘Abbas into a hadith.

It is even doubtful that Ibn ‘Abbas held this view, since in the following narration, Ibn ‘Abbas in fact says something completely different:

 Ahmad bin Yunus related to us that Sharik, Abu al-Ahwas and Abu Bakr bin ‘Ayyash related to them from ‘Asim (bin Bahdalah Abi al-Najud) from Abu Razin from Ibn ‘Abbas who said:There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.” Abu Da`ud said: “‘Ata also said so.” Al-Hakam said: “I think he should be flogged, but the number should not reach the prescribed punishment (for zina`, that is, 100 lashes)”. Al-Hasan said: “He is like al-zan.” Adu Da`ud said:This hadith of ‘Asim weakens the hadith of ‘Amr bin ‘Amr.” (Abu Da`ud 3872)

The following facts about the above narrations, when taken together, leave little doubt that the hadith prescribing the death penalty for sex with animals is a fabrication resulting from some mistake or an outright lie:

 First, the hadith is narrated only on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas (d. 68) in the first generation, only on the authority of ‘Ikrimah (d. 104) in the second generation, and then mostly from ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr (d. 144) in the third generation and very rarely from ‘Abbad bin Mansur (d. 152). Imams Malik, Bukhari, Muslim either did not know about it or did not trust it.

Second, narrators in the third generations, ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr and ‘Abbad bin Mansur, are not reliable. Abu Zur‘ah al-Razi considers ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr thiqah and Abu Hatim, Ibn ‘Adi and Ahmad say la bas bi hi. But al-Nasa`i considers him munkar and says he is not strong. Bukhari said that ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr is trustworthy but he has wrongly attributed to ‘Ikrimah several traditions. Yahya bin Ma‘in and al-‘Ajli also called him thiqah but rejected the ahadith he narrated from ‘Ikrimah from Ibn ‘Abbas. The views of scholars about ‘Abbad bin Mansur are even more negative. Thus he is described as da‘if al-hadith by Abu Hatim, laysa bi shay` by Yahya bin Ma‘in, layyin by al-Razi and munkar al-hadith, qadri, mudallis by Ahmad.

Third, in one narration in Musnad Ahmad, also from ‘Ikrimah from Ibn ‘Abbas, the “hadith” is found as a saying of Ibn ‘Abbas and NOT a saying of the Holy Prophet. So there is a distinct possibility that an opinion of Ibn ‘Abbas was attributed to the Prophet by a later transmitter such as ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr.

Fourth, it is doubtful that Ibn ‘Abbas believed in the death penalty for bestiality, since in another tradition Ibn ‘Abbas himself says clearly, “there is no prescribed punishment for sex with an animal”.

Fifth, as noted in ‘Awn al-Ma‘bud, the four Sunni schools of fiqh are unanimous that death is not prescribed for one who commits sexual intercourse with an animal, but may be given some other punishment (yu‘azzar wa la yuqtal). Such an agreement among the fuqaha` would have been difficult to develop if they generally knew and accepted a hadith, in which the Prophet ordered to kill the one who has sex with an animal.

Although, in view of the above considerations, there can be little doubt the hadith in question is a false hadith, yet some later scholars accept the hadith and then try to reconcile it with the opinion of the fuqaha`. Thus some say that killing is mentioned in the hadith only as a threat not meant to be carried out. Some say that the killing of the man is only a threat but killing of the animal is to be carried out in actuality. In contrast to such artificial explanations of later scholars, Abu Da`ud and Tirmidhi themselves show better sense. Abu Da`ud, facing the obvious, declares: the tradition of ‘Asim (in which it is denied that there is any prescribed punishment for sex with animals) weakens the tradition of ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr (in which the death penalty is prescribed). Tirmidhi also shows reservation about the hadith by noting: “We do not find this hadith except from ‘Amr bin ‘Amr and he from ‘Ikrimah and he from Ibn ‘Abbas and he from the Prophet.”

It is necessary that when the weakness of a hadith reaches the level shown above we should have the courage to call it a false hadith, something that many scholars do not do. The authentic teaching of Islam, meant to guide humanity for all times to come, could not have been transmitted in this weak way. If we do not declare such ahadith as false then this means that we cannot free ourselves from the errors and lies of some Muslims in the past and therefore cannot faithfully interpret and implement what God and his Messenger have taught us. This in turn means that we cannot move forward as a civilization…

Since the narration in Abu Da`ud 3870 does not attribute the death penalty for the homosexual act to the Prophet but only to Ibn ‘Abbas, it is quite possible that the tradition originally was not marfu‘ (attributed to the Prophet) but became so only at a later time. Earlier we noted a similar situation in case of a hadith from ‘Abbad bin Mansur about bestiality. In one narration (Ahmad 2597) the death penalty for this misdeed is attributed to Ibn ‘Abbas while in another narration, reported in al-Hakim, it becomes a hadith. This evidence strongly suggests that death penalties for sexual crimes were not originally based on the words of the Prophet but of some Companions. We can even go further: since the death penalty at least for the homosexual act was not known to al-Zuhri or Imam Malik as a hadith or even as an opinion of a Companion but as an opinion of some fuqaha` among the Successors, it is quite possible that even its attribution to a Companion such as Ibn ‘Abbas is not historical. Certainly, in case of bestiality we have seen evidence showing that Ibn ‘Abbas did not think that there was any prescribed penalty.

It is also worth noting that all the ahadith about the death penalty for deviant sex, i.e. sex with animals, a mahram, or a member of one’s own gender come from the same very small group of transmitters in the first four generations: Ibn ‘Abbas, ‘Ikrimah, Da`ud bin al-Husayn, ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr, Ibrahim bin Isma‘il etc. If the Prophet prescribed the death penalty for all these crimes, it is strange that its knowledge in all three cases remained limited to a few Hadith students for about one and a half century. (Shafaat, Death Penalty For Homosexuality, Incest, And Bestiality: Source)

Not only are there no sound narrations prescribing any specific punishments for bestiality, we actually find at least one scholarly reference that seems to support the permissibility of engaging in this perverted act.

{Side note: One interesting thing about the author is that he consistently claims throughout his article that the prescribed punishments mentioned in these weak or forged narrations regarding bestiality, homosexuality etc. actually come from the Holy Bible!}

To summarize our analysis of the Quran, we found one text worded in such a manner as to suggest that a person can take a mate, a partner from cattle. Other texts seem to support it by saying that individuals are to protect their private parts except from their spouses and what their right hands own. Since animals are part of what a person owns this seems to suggest that intercourse with beasts is permissible. Even if one wishes to argue that the author didn’t mean to imply that bestiality is permissible, at the very least this shows that the Quran is far from being as eloquent and as clear as Muslims believe. Specific texts are written in a very chaotic and confusing manner, leading into all kinds of ethical and theological problems.

The Muslims are obviously left in a very difficult position.

H/T Answering-Islam

I have also noted that in Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law (Shari’a guidelines), j3.13 – j3.15, pgs 318 – 319, in the Pilgrimage section of Shari’a, under the “Sexual Intercourse or Foreplay” subsection, it does refer to having intercourse with a camel or cow will make the hajj (mandatory pilgrimage) void, and the animal will have to be halal slaughtered.

So, it appears in their law book that on is allowed to perform bestiality, unless one is on hajj…

HIGH ALERT: 3 Elementary Schools Receive Threats That Beheadings Will Occur Sometime This Week


by Prissy Holly / on October 8, 2014

Police on Tuesday received an anonymous threat in the form of a letter stating that beheadings were planned in three Rhode Island schools across these cities: Johnston, Warwick, and Cranston.

The contents of the letter which were kept confidential initially, detailed that the attacks would be carried out between Wednesday and Friday of this week.

After parents were notified of the possible threat, many parents kept their children at home, and hundreds of comments on Facebook began to accumulate:

“School should be cancelled in those cities tomorrow until they figure out if it is a real threat. Why risk kids and teacher’s lives?” one of the comments said.

According to officials, the threats have yet to be validated.

classsroom2

The school did increase their security measures, however, as all three schools moved their recess periods indoors. Doors will also remained locked, and I.D.’s will be checked for anyone attempting to gain entrance into the schools. Additionally, police will be present in the schools, both undercover and uniformed over the course of the next few days.

Warwick Police Chief Stephen McCartney in a statement said:

“While the words are very chilling, I certainly would want to emphasize that the safest place right now is in school. I’ve got a police officer in every school and so do the other jurisdictions. We are providing the security that is necessary. We know that whoever did this decided to create the most chaos he could by picking on the most vulnerable.”

It will be interesting to see if this is somehow tied to ISIS, since their favorite thing to do lately is behead people. It looks as though school officials and local authorities are taking the right precautions, so hopefully everyone will remain safe.

h/t [OpposingViews]

Posted on 8 Oct 14 by Mad World News

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: