• December 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Nov    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • Truth about Islam and Shari’a law

  • Blog Stats

    • 67,846 hits
  • Must Read! Click Picture!

  • Must Read: click picture!

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 33 other followers

  • Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

    Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

  • We love & support Israel!!!

  • Get Educated & Educate Others!! Click the Picture!

    CLICK THIS PICTURE!!!

  • NO TOLERANCE FOR INTOLERANCE, NO APOLOGY FOR BEING FREE!!!

  • Key Strategies for the Counter Jihad!

    Click on image above - read about strategies!

Saudi Restaurants Begin Banning Single Women


Sun, November 30, 2014

A Saudi Arabian woman on her cell phone. Saudi restaurant owners have begin to ban single women for objectionable behavior including use of a cell phone.

A Saudi Arabian woman on her cell phone. Saudi restaurant owners have begin to ban single women for objectionable behavior including use of a cell phone.

In another blow to women’s rights in the desert kingdom, Saudi Arabian restaurants have begun to ban single women from entering their premises. The ban has also been extended to  women not accompanied by a male guardian.

Signs in various restaurants around the kingdom have begun popping up announcing the ban. Restaurant owners claim that women in restaurants have been behaving in “a shocking way,” according to one blogger who supported the ban.

The objectionable behavior included flirting, smoking and using a mobile phone. Local media Al Marsad reported a typical remark written by one blogger who wrote: “She would come in alone and focuses on her mobile from which emanates loud music.  She then takes out a cigarette and upsets other guests who may call in the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice. This could cause problem for the restaurant. So the best thing is to keep women away from restaurants unless they have a male custodian. That way the restaurant is not shut down because of the misbehavior of an adolescent or mentally unstable woman.”

Other disagreed, writing, “This is utterly ridiculous. This means that a hungry woman who wants to eat something needs a male custodian to enter a restaurant,” Harraq said. “This is so shameful. Such attitudes are not accepted from any Muslim regarding anyone, let alone a hungry woman who wants to eat something and who will sit in the family section of the restaurant. She is a human being and she has feelings and emotions.”

Speaking to Al-Hayat, one Saudi woman said that restaurants and cafes are the two of the main sources of recreation for women in the kingdom. “If they’re going to ban us from entering restaurants, where are we supposed to go?” she asked, requesting that any restaurant that bans women should be boycotted.

Rights groups expressed outrage over this new phenomenon, which they said were illegal. “These signs are against the law and reflect the personal opinions of the restaurant owners,” said Khalid Al-Fakhri , secretary general for the National Society for Human Rights. “Restaurants should come up with alternative solutions if it’s customers are behaving inappropriately.”

Saudi Arabia has one of the world’s most dismal records for women’s rights. Women in the kingdom are forbidden to be in public without a male guardian. Most sports activities and professions are forbidden to them. Saudi Arabia is also the only country in the world where women are not allowed to drive.

Meanwhile, despite the requirement for women to wear burkas in public, sexual harassment of Saudi women remains rampant (see video below):

Posted on 30 Nov 14 by Clarion Project

UAE Designates CAIR and Muslim American Society (MAS) as Terrorist Organizations


cair-terrorists-5

by, Sharona Schwartz | The Blaze

The Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society are each registering their outrage over reportedly being designated terrorist organizations by the United Arab Emirates.

The two American groups were listed alongside the Islamic State group, Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood branches, as well as European Muslim groups in Italy, Germany, Sweden, Norway and Finland, Britain’s Cordoba Foundation and the Muslim Association of Britain. The full list, numbering 83 groups, was approved by the UAE cabinet Saturday and was posted by the official news agency WAM.

CAIR described its inclusion on the terrorism list as “shocking and bizarre” and called on the UAE government to remove them.

“There is absolutely no factual basis for the inclusion [of] CAIR and other American and European civil rights and advocacy groups on this list,” CAIR said in a statement Sunday.

Video courtesy of: Brooke Goldstein

“Like the rest of the mainstream institutions representing the American Muslim community, CAIR’s advocacy model is the antithesis of the narrative of violent extremists,” the group said. “We call on the United Arab Emirates cabinet to review this list and remove organizations such as CAIR, the Muslim American Society and other civil society organizations that peacefully promote civil and democratic rights and that oppose terrorism whenever it occurs, wherever it occurs and whoever carries it out.”

CAIR said it recently joined other Muslim-American leaders to release an open letter in Arabic “refuting the ideology of the terrorist group ISIS and urging its supporters to repent and ‘return to the religion of mercy.’”

The Muslim American Society said in its own statement that it was “shocked” to learn of its inclusion.

“The Muslim American Society is a religious community service organization that serves people in the United States. We have no dealings with the United Arab Emirates, and hence are perplexed by this news,” the group said. “Before proceeding any further, we would first like to verify the accuracy of the news reports and receive an official response from the United Arab Emirates regarding the reports. We would also like to seek the help of our government to address this issue.”

CAIR was named by federal prosecutors in 2007 along with about 300 others as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a Hamas funding case connected with the Holy Land Foundation trial. Hamas has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government since 2007. BuzzFeed noted that a federal judge later ruled that the government should not have included CAIR as a co-conspirator list, and CAIR was never charged with any crime.

CAIR, an Islamic advocacy group, was one of the organizations that sponsored the first Muslim prayer service held at the Washington National Cathedral on Friday.

The Associated Press noted that the UAE’s decision to include the Muslim Brotherhood on its terrorist group list followed similar terrorism designations for the Muslim Brotherhood by Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

Posted on 22 Nov 14 by Sharia Unveiled

BREAKING: ISIS Releases Audio Broadcast Calling on All Muslims Around the World to Begin Murdering Non-Muslims


Posted by sharia unveiled on September 22, 2014

Sheikh Abu Mohammad al-Adnani

Sheikh Abu Mohammad al-Adnani

by, CBC News | h/t Billy Welch

In an audio recording distributed widely on social media Sunday, Islamic extremist group ISIS urged Muslims globally to launch attacks on civilians in member countries of a U.S.-led coalition opposed to their violent spread through areas of Syria and Iraq.

Audio Broadcast (In Arabic) English Translation Here:

Video courtesy of: All Eyes On ISIS 

In the nearly 42-minute long meandering propaganda speech uploaded to Twitter, ISIS spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani encourages Muslims to kill “disbelievers” in countries, including Canada, currently supporting American and French-backed military action against the group in Iraq “in any manner.”

“If you can kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French — or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State … kill him in any manner or way however it may be,” said Adnani.

Threats made in the audio recording mirror those ISIS has made in other propaganda releases, including during the grisly beheading videos of two American journalists, James Foley and Stephen Sotloff, and British aid worker David Haines.

Adnani blamed Western allies for instigating a war against the terrorist group, and said the ongoing air incursions against ISIS positions in Iraq will be “the final campaign of the crusaders.”

Unlike other terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda, ISIS has established a widespread presence on social networks, using highly produced videos and audio recordings in an effort to recruit new fighters from abroad and intimidate those opposed to their murderous agenda.

- – -

Editorial Footnote:

Just in case YouTube pulls the audio broadcast above, it can be found here on Al-Furqan Media

Posted on 22 Sep 14 by Sharia Unveiled

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. This is an outrage…how many people take them seriously? not many, because many non-Muslims feel they are just a rogue Islamic group that has distorted the “peaceful religion”…these are the people that follow after the taqiyya or lies the Muslim Brotherhood, Barack Hussein Islama Obama, David Cameron, and other groups/people associated with them, and being brainwashed by the un-Godly spirit of deception (oh that’s right, one of allah’s names is the god of deception, as is satan’s, go figure) as well as being oppressed by the spirit of being gullible and lazy (not wanting to get the facts, just want to believe what your told, factual or not). Many people are thinking, and the MB are spreading that ISIS is a rogue, and that they will not do anything…BHO and DC are saying the same thing, they don’t really have a plan to fight them…in fact, when Obama was asked what he thought about the beheadings, he stated that he was going to beheading to the golf course.

I bring this up because, in reality, the MB created ISIS, with the help of BHO, to create an Islamic army, as well as installing a caliphate into the world…to push off their terrorism to force people to submit to their god, or die. The game that is being played is the MB is trying to make them look like they are loonies in the public’s eyes, all the while, behind closed doors, they are telling ISIS to infiltrate enemy (Western) countries with sleeper cells and kill as many as they can. This is the covert actions of the MB, make people think they actually care for non-Muslims, when they just want to deceive them into submission or death.]

The Noble Teachings of Islam


Posted by sharia unveiled on August 21, 2014

al-quran-19

O Islamophobic Kafers! Do Not Criticize Islam before Knowing the Noble Teachings of Islam Fully, Part 1

by, Mirza Ghalib | Islam Watch

Recently, I noticed most western social media making fun about a Saudi Sheikh, who was killed years ago by a donkey while he allegedly tried to sodomize the poor animal.

Never criticize Islam without knowing its noble teachings fully

It has become a fashion in recent years to make fun about anything and everything related to Islam without analyzing the depth of such incidents. Those who criticize Islam don’t have adequate knowledge about Islam and its founder Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Not that it is their fault, who mock the Prophet (pbuh) of Islam out of ignorance. Instead, it is absolutely the fault of Islam’s so-called Scholars, Mullahs and Imams, who gave up their responsibilities to worldly pleasures, and forgot to deliver the message delivered by our Prophet to the ignorant Kafers. Our prophet (pbuh) strongly insisted Muslims to deliver his message to each and every dirty Kafer till the Day of Resurrection. Though our so-called Scholars failed to deliver the Messages of our beloved Prophet, it becomes the responsibility of each Muslim who read the Islamic scriptures to share the Messages of our beloved Prophet (pbuh) to the unclean infidels.

Convey my teachings to the people – prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

Due to limited space for this article, I’ll give the extracts of hadiths and their numbers, by which the ‘Kafers’ can search the internet and check the detailed hadiths. In Part 1 of this article, let us investigate the reality behind the nasty Islamophobic infidel critics of Saudi Sheikh’s sodomy incident and enlighten them about Sodomy and Homosexuality in Islam.

Abu Dawud, Book 25, Hadith 3639: Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) allowed his companions to record his practices as hadiths so as to make easier to his followers to adopt his practices (Sunnah) in their day-to-day life.

Mishkat al Masabih I, p. 173: The Book of Allah and Sunnah of the Prophet is all you need. The apostle said, “I leave with you two things. If you hold fast by them both, you will never be misguided. The Quran and my Sunna”

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 56, Hadith 667: The Prophet said, “Convey (my teachings) to the people even if it were a single sentence….

Al Imran 3:31: “…If you love Allah, then follow me (Muhammad)…”

Al Ahzab 33:21: “Ye have indeed in the Apostle of Allah a beautiful pattern of (conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day.”

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 1, Book 3, Hadith 98: “…..Do not accept anything save the Hadiths of the Prophet. Circulate knowledge and teach the ignorant, for knowledge does not vanish except when it is kept secretly (to oneself).

Authenticity of Ahadith

Ahadith (plural of hadith) were collected in abundance, and were screened to such an extent that the watered-down collections of ahadith what we have today were reduced to less than 1% of the initial collections. This was done primarily due to the lack of ‘morality’ in most of the hadiths initially collected. For example, the author of Sahih Al-Bukhari had collected over 600,000 (some other reports assert 900,000) ahadith, of which he kept only 7397 as ‘dependable’. It is a shame on our irresponsible so-called Scholars, Mullahs and Imams for not making available even this less than 1% sanitized traditions of our beloved Prophet (pbuh) to the nonbelievers. Maybe they are just obliging to the following hadith for securing their livelihood:

Teach religion to the people according to their mental calibre” (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 1, The book of knowledge, Chapter 50, Hadith 129)

And the Quran also teaches Muslims to lie under its Al-Taqiya doctrine. (Quran: An-Nahl 16:106 & Al-Imran 3:28)

Let us forget the hypocrisy of our scholars and Imams. Here we are to convey the sacred teachings about Sodomy and Homosexuality that penetrated deeply in Islam, and will rub it on the faces of the stupid Kafers, who makes fun of our practices. I strongly ‘condemn’ the dirty criticism of the Kafers and give them the message that “Don’t talk anything against the Islamic sodomy or homosexuality from now on. Do you think you can eradicate Islam by raising the issue of sodomy in Islam? Well, Islam will not exist today without Sodomy and Homosexuality. Without Sodomy and Homosexuality, Islam will be like ‘omelet without an egg’.

Prophet Lot was sent exclusively to the land of sodomy

Islam has a long history of Sodomy and homosexuality.

There were 124,000 failed attempts of our Almighty and All-perfect Allah (saw) for bringing his creation to the righteous path, every time by sending a prophet to them in the tiny part (i.e. the Middle East) of the vast world. Amongst them, Prophet Lot was sent exclusively to the people of sodomy and homosexuality. Although the story of Prophet Lot in the Quran was copied from the Bible, it is not approved by us Muslims, as usual. The Quran contains several references to “the people of Lut”, the Biblical Lot, citing the residents of Sodom and Gomorrah (ref. Quran 7:80–84, 11:77–83, 15:61-75, 21:74, 22:43, 26:165–175, 27:54–58, and 29:27–35), and their destruction by Allah was explicitly due to their their perverse sexual practices. Despite this, most Muslims commit Sodomy, Allah (swt) knows better.

There happened an interesting incident during the Prophet Lot’s time, which is recorded in the Quran. It is about the visit of two angels to Prophet Lot somewhere in the Arab land. It is to be noted that Allah condemned the Christians in the Quran for giving feminine names to his angels, and says that all of his angels are male (Quran: An-Najm 53:27). After seeing the two ‘handsome’ boys (angels), a mob of the people of Lot started chasing to sodomize them. Loot rushed at a critical moment and saved the two angels of Allah (swt) by trading her two young daughters to the mob to rape and ravishes them. Remember! Lot traded his two girls to save the two boys (angels). This incident reflects the perverted mentality of the author of our Quran towards homosexuality.

Quran: Hood 11:78, Al-Hijr 15:71: Lot offers his daughters to a mob of angel rapists.

It is recorded in the History of Al-Tabari that about four million men lived in Sodomy during the period of Allah’s another Prophet, Moses (Al-Tabari 2:124)

About four million males in Sodomy during the period of Moses? Then what would be the total population during the period of Moses in Israel?

O Muslims! Control the thing inbetween your legs

Our beloved Prophet knew the art of teaching Allah’s message in simplest form. He taught Allah’s message to us in a very simple and easily understandable language, as if he was fond of speaking such language, as he did in the following hadith:

Malik, Book 56, Hadith 56.5.11 : “…..The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Whomever Allah protects from the evil of two things will enter the Garden. They are what is between his jaws and what is between his legs, what is between his jaws and what is between his legs, what is between his jaws and what is between his legs.”

O Muslim men! Don’t sleep without undergarment while sleeping in group with men

Our Prophet (pbuh) had a very clear idea about what would happen if his Sahaba didn’t wear their underwear while sleeping in groups. So, he always advised them before hand:

Abu Dawud: Book 32:Hadith 4038 : The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) forbade ……men sleeping together without an under-garment ….”.

Abu Dawud: Book 31:Hadith 4007 : The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man should not look at the private parts of another man…..”.

O Muslim martyrs! Enjoy your stay in your graves along with your fellow martyr

Our prophet (pbuh) was very grateful and responsible toward his martyred Sahaba, for they sacrificed their life to make him the Sultan of Arabia. Muhammad knew that there is no such place called Paradise or virgins or young boys in therein, for which his gullible but greedy Sahaba were rushed for. So, to give them immediate pleasure – which he himself believed in – he used to bury the martyrs in pairs in graves.

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 2: Book 23: Hadith 427 & 429 : The Prophet buried every two martyrs in of Uhud in one grave.

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 5: Book 59: Hadith 406 : Allah’s Apostle used to shroud two martyrs of Uhud in one sheet….”.

Some of his Sahaba were hated to see their loved one is being buried with the corps of other homosexual. So, they reacted against Muhammad’s deed and buried their relatives in separate graves:

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 2: Book 23: Hadith 434 & 435 : Narrated Jabir: A man was buried along with my father and I did not like it till I took him (i.e. my father) out and buried him in a separate grave.

muhammad-golden-door-1

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) slept with young men for 20 nights in his mosque

Our prophet’s house was separated by a partition wall from his Medina mosque. Although, he had a number of wives in the other side of his mosque (i.e., his house) along with similar number of servant (sex) girls, the holy prophet preferred to sleep with the young men in his mosque:

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 11: Hadith 604 & 653, Vol 8: Book 73: Hadith 37; Sahih Muslim: Book 4: Hadith 1423: We went to the Prophet and we were all young men and stayed with him for about twenty nights. ‘The prophet was very merciful!!’……”

(‘god’ alone knows how merciful that Muhammad was)

Prophet Muhammad used to sleep between two men

Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol 4:429: The Prophet said, “While I was at the House (Kaba) in a state midway between sleep and wakefulness, (an angel recognized me) as the man lying between two men…..”

(Hope our Prophet would have worn his undergarment…………., probably’!)

Allah (saw) promises Muslims with prepubescent pearl-like boys in paradise

Allah (swt) the Wise and Merciful knew the weakness (toward Sodomy & homosexuality) of His creation (especially Arab Muslims). So, he guaranteed in his Quran to grant us with prepubescent boys to fulfill our urge:

Quran, Al-Waaqia 56:17-23: Those in the Garden will be attended by immortal youths with wide, lovely eyes.

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was fond of buttocks

In his usual skill at delivering his messages in simplest form to reach his gullible followers, our holy prophet conveyed his message of how he paid attention to the buttocks of the kuffar women in this hadith:

Sahih Al-Bukhari: Vol 9: Book 88: Hadith 232 : Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established till the buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daus move while going round Dhi-al-Khalasa.” Dhi-al-Khalasa was the idol of the Daus tribe which they used to worship in the pre-Islamic period of ignorance.

(We Muslim men should be are eagerly waiting to see the shaking hot buttocks of kuffar women as the signs of the Dooms Day)

Allah to sticking flags of unbelief on kuffars’ buttocks

Allah will insert flags to the buttocks of the wrongdoers on doomsday.

Sahih Muslim: Book 19: Hadith 4309 : It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag fixed behind the buttocks of every person guilty of the breach of faith.

Not interested in having sex with your wife for a period? Just imagine her buttock like your mother’s!

If a Muslim doesn’t like temporarily to have a sex (anal?) with one of his wives, he can take oath by saying “Your buttocks are similar to my mothers’” and stay away from her.

Abu Dawud/ Book 12/ Hadith 2207, 2212 & 2214 : Narrated Salamah ibn Sakhr al-Bayadi: I was a man who was more given than others to sexual intercourse with women. When the month of Ramadan came, I feared lest I should have intercourse with my wife, and this evil should remain with me till the morning. So I made my wife like my ‘MOTHER’S BACK’ to me till the end of Ramadan. But one night when she was waiting upon me, something of her was revealed (Quran/ Sura Al-Mujadila 58:2). Suddenly I jumped upon her. When the morning came I went to my people and informed them about this matter.

Quran verse 58:2 was revealed to allow Muslims to have sex from evening to early morning during Ramadan fasting. This shows how merciful our Allah is towards us Muslims. He even reveal a verse instantly to ease our sexual urges during the holy fasting month in Islam. My Muslim brethren should not feel bothered by bad-mouthing if the filthy Kafers about our religion. Comprehending the dept and meaning of these spiritual teachings of Islam are beyond their lowly intellect.

Umm Sulaim, the outstanding female companion of prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

I conclude this article with a shameful act of the sexually perverted Sahaba couple (Muhammad’s companions) and our beloved Prophet’s the shameless blessings to it:

Islamic scriptures never reveal the names of Muhammad’s female companions (Sahabiyaat). But there are few exceptions, because without them, it is not possible to complete those scriptures. Islamic scriptures name those consorts of our holy prophet with whom he had deepest intimacy. Umm Sulaim was one such intimate girlfriend of our noble prophet (pbuh).

Before going to that particular hadith, it will be worthwhile to know the extent of intimacy of Um Sulaim with our Prophet (pbuh). Here are some hadiths that will help us understand the level of intimacy between our Prophet and his married female Sahabi (female companion) Um Sulaim, wife of Abu Talha. Women in Islam are usually recognized by their father, husband or any of their male relatives. But Umm Sulaim’s husband and her son were recognized by herself. Here are the hadiths:

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 4: Book 52: Hadith 97/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 7: Book 62: Hadith 92 : Muhammad used to visit Umm Sulaim’s house very often, apart from his jumbo harem (nine to eleven wives at a time).

(May be our wise Prophet used to send her husband Abu Talha to some warfront on Jihad during his visit to her house).

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 8: Book 73: Hadith 170 & 221 : Muhammad used to compare Umm Sulaim with glass (i.e., too delicate to handle her).

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 11: Hadith 694/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 12: Hadith 830: The Prophet used to offer night prayer in Umm Sulaim’s house!

(How many rakah he performed? Allah knows best).

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 3: Hadith 132/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 1: Book 5: Hadith 280/ Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 8: Book 73: Hadith 113 & 142 : Umm Sulaim clarified doubts about her wet dream (nocturnal sexual discharge) with prophet Muhammad (pbuh) without shyness.

( When everything is open, what is to kept secret?)

Sahi Al-Bukhari: Vol 8: Book 74: Hadith 298: Umm Sulaim used to collect Muhammad’s sweat, while he was sleeping at her home, and used it as perfume.

(Allah knows best, from which part of Muhammad’s body, she has collected the sweat)

After reading the above hadiths anyone can assert about the characteristics and the bondage between a married woman Sahabi Umm Sulaim and our ‘noble’ Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). (Let us not forget to say PBUH – Peace be upon him, each time).

A real challenge to us, Muslims, to emulate this practice of this Sahaba couple and fulfill our prophet’s wish

Now, we are left with a hadith describing a most shameful sexual act between our prophet’s married companion couple, Abu Talha and Umm Sulaim, which will make the entire humanity feel ashamed. The beauty of this shameful hadith is that the narrator Anas bin Malik was the son of couple committing the act. Anas bin Malik was given to Muhammad by his mother Umm Sulaim as a servant when he was ‘young boy’. This boy was taking care of ‘all’ the needs of our Prophet (pbuh).

Sahih Muslim: Book 25: Hadith 5341: Anas b. Malik reported that the son of Abu Talha had been ailing. Abu Talha set out (on a journey) and his son breathed his last (in his absence). When Abu Talha came back, he said (to his wife): What about my child? Umm Sulaim (the wife of Abu Talha) said: He is now in a more comfortable state than before. She served him the evening meal and he took it. He then came to her (and had sexual intercourse with her) and when it was all over, she said: Make arrangements for the burial of the child. When it was morning. Abu Talha came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and informed him, whereupon he said: Did you spend the night with her. He said: Yes. He (the Holy Prophet) then said: O Allah, bless both of them (and as a result of blessing) she gave birth to a child……”.

It is a long hadith, and are few more hadiths on this subject. The child by name Abdullah, born to their intercourse while their dead child laying beside awaiting burial, became a Jihadi hero (martyr!!) in later days. So, my Muslim brethren! In case one of your child die, do not let the fortuitous opportunity pass by in grief. Instead, do have sex with your wife before your dead child is buried.

Abu Talha and Umm Sulaim would have been the worst example of human being on this planet to engage in sexual act near the corps of their little son awaiting burial. But the real question is: How come our holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) ask the couple whether they had intercourse in presence of the corps of their beloved child? What kind of a perverted person our holy prophet was? And do we Muslims dare to adopt this practice ourselves, which our noble Prophet (pbuh) wished us to do?

CONCLUSION: Though, it is a shameful act that the Saudi Sheikh was killed by a donkey while he allegedly attempted to sodomize it, our ‘Prophet’ Muhammad (pbuh) was no better as he used to spend his time with the married woman Umm Sulaim, especially when he had a jumbo pack of wives at home. And does he deserves to be called as a decent human being when he could ask his Sahaba couple if they had sex in front of the dead-body of their deceased child.

In this part, we have discussed about homosexuality and about few human buttocks. In Part 2 of this article, we will discuss about Muhammad’s ‘affections’ toward animals (especially the she-animals), and the domesticated animals, (i.e. women of Islam). I apologies for using this term about my Muslim sisters, but this is what what our beloved holy prophet called them as his farewell hajj sermon.

Tabari IX:113: “Treat women well for THEY ARE LIKE DOMESTIC ANIMALS WITH YOU and they do not possess anything themselves. Allah has made the enjoyment of their bodies lawful in his Qur’an.”

Posted on 21 Aug 14 by Sharia Unveiled

OFFICIAL RELEASE: Statement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada in Response to the Situation in Israel


Originally posted on sharia unveiled:

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper 1 (resized)

PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA

STEPHEN HARPER

The following is an official release from:

The Office of Prime Minister Stephen Harper

re: In response to the situation in Israel

Prime Minister Stephen Harper today issued the following statement in response to the situation in Israel:

“The indiscriminate rocket attacks from Gaza on Israel are terrorist acts, for which there is no justification. It is evident that Hamas is deliberately using human shields to further terror in the region.

“Failure by the international community to condemn these reprehensible actions would encourage these terrorists to continue their appalling actions. Canada calls on its allies and partners to recognize that these terrorist acts are unacceptable and that solidarity with Israel is the best way of stopping the conflict.

“Canada is unequivocally behind Israel. We support its right to defend itself, by itself, against these terror attacks, and urge Hamas to immediately cease their…

View original 48 more words

The Vatican Falls for the ‘Interfaith’ Scam


Posted by sharia unveiled on June 28, 2014

vatican-muslims-2

14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?  2 Corinthians 6:14 King James (KJV)

by, Ned May / Baron Bodissey | FrontPage Mag | h/t Gates of Vienna

On June 8, 2014 — Pentecost Sunday — the Vatican hosted an “interfaith event” that included prayers by Christian priests, a Jewish rabbi, and a Muslim imam. The occasion was well-publicized in advance by the Holy See as a “pause in politics” that would promote peace between the Israel and the Palestinians.

During his visit to Israel and the Palestinian Authority the previous month, Pope Francis had invited Israeli President Shimon Peres and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to attend the event. Both leaders accepted the invitation, and sat with the Pope while prayers were said and chanted in the Vatican garden.

The imam, however, went beyond the script that had been handed to the Vatican in advance. He included in his chanted prayer verses 284-286 of Sura 2 in the Koran, the last part of which calls for Allah to grant the Muslims victory over the infidels. His words were broadcast live to a television audience, but they were in Arabic, so most non-Muslim viewers had no idea what he had said.

vatican-muslims-1

This apparently included the Vatican hierarchy. When someone who did understand Arabic pointed out what had happened, a Vatican spokesman at first denied that any such thing had occurred. Those verses weren’t in the advance script — how could he possibly have said them? No Muslim, especially a respected imam, would ever go back on his word!

Later, when that story became untenable, the Vatican soft-pedaled the added text, saying that there was nothing really wrong with it. To further complicate matters, a doctored tape of the Arabic prayer was released in which the final part of verse 2:286 was edited out. It’s not clear who did the editing, but the altered version certainly did serve the interests of the Vatican.

With the help of Vlad Tepes, I was able to track down a complete video of the prayer from an Arabic television channel and then have it translated (by a volunteer who prefers to remain anonymous) and subtitled. As far as I can determine, the imam’s name was never made public, either by the Vatican or the English-language Arab news sites. I’m told he’s Palestinian, and his distinctive headgear identifies him as having the authoritative credentials of Al-Azhar University:

A German-speaking Jesuit priest, Fr. Felix Körner, made a valiant effort to demonstrate that 2:286 was in full accord with Christian doctrine, and was peaceful in intent. During an interview he said (translated from the German by Rembrandt Clancy):

“This verse, perhaps spontaneously selected by someone who then also recited the Koran from memory, actually fitted very well into the overall context of the Prayer for Peace! There are always three steps in the three religions: We recognise the Creator and praise Him, we recognise our guilt and confess it and we plead for the gift of peace. And all that comes out very beautifully in these three verses of the Koran.

[…]

“There is a certain parallel insofar as a quotation torn out of context is particularly easily misunderstood. And if one removes from the text only the reference to unbelievers, one can easily use it as a peg upon which to hang something and then say that an infringement has taken place here. On the other hand we have in this case a Koran recitation which pertains to someone who not only quotes, but recites, and who also says: what I am reciting here is also what I believe. And in the same breath he is also saying: We Muslims, as the Koran precisely tells us, recognise the other religions with their prophets. Therefore from the Muslim side, there was by no means any deprecation or exclusion intended or expressed. Rather it was said: We are bringing here a religious idea, one which welcomes and accepts you all, and naturally in certain Koranic way, tries to set things right again. But there was nothing here which was meant to exclude or rebuff; rather a Koran verse was recited, which is meant to express the highest respect and therefore can also be received as such.” [emphasis added]

But is this interpretation true? Does Islam really “recognize the other religions with their prophets”? Was there really no “deprecation or exclusion intended”?

It’s always unwise to trust a non-Muslim’s interpretations of Islamic scripture and law. Our political are always telling us what Islam means — witness Boris Johnson, David Cameron, and George W. Bush — with less than complete credibility. Now we have a Jesuit priest telling us what Islam does and does not mean.

It’s also unwise to trust a Muslim cleric or spokesman when he explains Islam to a non-Muslim audience. There are very clear reasons for this skepticism, based in the Koran and the hadith (the sayings of Mohammed) and all major interpretations of Islamic law that are derived from those.

So how do we understand what happened at the Vatican on Pentecost Sunday?

We begin with this: last November a well-meaning Pope Francis issued a papal declaration, Evangelii Gaudium, which said among other things that “our respect for true followers of Islam should lead us to avoid hateful generalisations, for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.”

Now we’re going to take the advice of Major (ret.) Stephen Coughlin, one of the foremost non-Muslim experts on Islamic law in the United States. If we want to understand Islamic law, Maj. Coughlin tells us: “You must read things written by Muslims who are recognized in the Muslim community as experts in the topic they are writing about, and who are writing for a Muslim audience. If you fail to do that, you are not doing your job.”

Therefore, to provide context for the momentous events of June 8, the following information is instructive. It is derived from ’Umdat al-salik wa ’uddat al-nasik, which is commonly referred to as Reliance of the Traveller when cited in English. This an authoritative source on Sunni Islamic law, because it is certified as such by Al-Azhar University in Cairo. There is no higher authority on Sunni Islamic doctrine than Al-Azhar; it is the closest equivalent to the Vatican that can be found in Islam.

Consider this passage from Reliance of the Traveller, chapter O, o9.0:

Jihad means to wage war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad.

[…]

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus is such Koranic verses as:

•Fighting is prescribed for you (Koran 2:216)

•Slay them wherever you find them (Koran 4:89)

•Fight the idolators utterly (Koran 9:36)

In o9.8, Reliance of the Traveller describes the objectives of jihad:

The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)… and the war continues until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax…

Now it becomes clear that — contrary to what Fr. Körner said — Islam does indeed deprecate and exclude other religions, specifically including Judaism and Christianity. This deprecation and exclusion goes so far as to mandate warfare against those religions.

We should also bear in mind what Islamic law says about lying. In Book R “Holding One’s Tongue,” §r8.0 “Lying” at r8.2 “Permissible Lying,” Reliance of the Traveller cites the iconic Islamic legal jurist Imam Abu Hamid Ghazali:

This is an explicit statement that lying is sometimes permissible for a given interest… When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N: i.e., when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible) and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.

To sum up: according to an authoritative manual of Islamic law certified by Al-Azhar University — the same University that accredited the imam who prayed at the Vatican — the devout Muslim is obligated to make war against Christians and Jews until they convert to Islam, submit and pay the poll tax, or die.

Since this goal is obligatory, it is also obligatory for the devout Muslim to lie to Christians and Jews about what his religion means, and what it intends, if such lies help Islam achieve the final conquest.

This is why we are ill-advised to take Muslim spokesmen at their word when they describe the peaceful intentions of Islam.

Now hear what Maj. Stephen Coughlin has to say about what happened at the Vatican on Pentecost Sunday. He explains in great detail, using authoritative sources on Islamic law, what the imam was doing when he inserted those three extra verses into his prayer in the Vatican garden:

As you can see, Pope Francis and the leaders of the Catholic Church, not to mention the Jewish representatives from Israel, had the wool deftly pulled over their eyes by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The “interfaith” movement is a Muslim Brotherhood scam designed to soften up gullible Jews and Christians in advance of the inevitable Islamic victory.

The incident in the Vatican garden received very little Western media attention, even though it was one of the most important stories of the decade. We were all too busy paying attention to the more obvious jihad in Syria and Iraq, where Islam is reaching the same goal through fire and blood and slaughter.

What happened at the Vatican is understood (correctly) by Muslims as a great victory for Islam. Using stealth and deception, the Al-Azhar imam penetrated the innermost sanctum of Christendom and claimed it for the Umma.

 

source(‘s): http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ned-may/the-vatican-falls-for-the-interfaith-scam/

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/06/the-vatican-falls-for-the-interfaith-scam/#more-33602

Posted on 28 Jun 14 by Sharia Unveiled

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. Do not forget, according to the “Pope Prophecy” from Saint Malachi…pope 112 from after the prophecy was written was going to be the anti-Christ’s false prophet…in studying the Bible’s Book of Revelation, we find out the anti-Christ will be Muslim, which coincides with Islamic prophecies of their mahdi…(both the same entity) and the anti-Christ’s world religion will be Chrislam…and the Pope is working now to merge Islam with Catholicism…]

ISIS Releases it’s 5-Year Territorial Expansion Plan


Posted by sharia unveiled on June 23, 2014

isis-map-5-year-plan

Map courtesy of: Ayman Mohyeldin | h/t Terri Lynn

Posted on 23 Jun14 by Sharia Unveiled

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. And this doesn’t entail the subvert takeover of Western countries…

How can people believe the white washed version of Islam when they state that Islam is peaceful and tolerant…do people think that one can take over multiple countries in five years by just preaching or asking, or do people want to be politically correct (reality shows, PC is in actuality dhimminess, ask Mohammed), or are they just stupid and don’t want to rile up the Muslims, for fear of death? you decide.

Sad thing is…the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (Syria) were a part of al-Qaeda, which was created by the Muslim Brotherhood as one of their military arms…the al-Qaeda are primarily Sunni (which aren’t as aggressive as the Shia, but they will still kill infidels and Kufars without much hesitance), where the Iraq is primarily Shia (which are more aggressive because they look more at the mahdi coming back and the Shia will be at the top of the list of “good works” in satan’s I mean allah’s eyes.

This rift between the the Shia and the Sunni could possibly be the feet in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. You see, in verses 41-43 in Daniel 2, it talks about the feet being of “mixed” with clay and iron. Now, something to put together (not saying this the a God given interpretation,  but one of my thinking, the Book of Daniel was written in Aramaic, and in the Aramaic mixed was translated from the word “ereb”. Ereb, in Aramaic, according to the Strong’s Hebrew Lexicon 6151 and 6152, is Arab. Now the thought to gander here is, the iron in the feet could mean Shia Muslims, because they are like iron when performing oppression and terrorism according to what allah and Mohammed said to do, verses the mirey clay the Shia are mixed with, which could be the “not as aggressive” Sunni. They do not fully get along with each other…case in point…ISIS and al-Qaeda…they started out to be working together, but they separated for differences in religious beliefs.]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers

%d bloggers like this: