• November 2017
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
  • Truth about Islam and Shari’a law

  • Blog Stats

    • 112,401 hits
  • Must Read! Click Picture!

  • Must Read: click picture!

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 37 other followers

  • Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

    Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

  • We love & support Israel!!!

  • Get Educated & Educate Others!! Click the Picture!

    CLICK THIS PICTURE!!!

  • Key Strategies for the Counter Jihad!

    Click on image above - read about strategies!

Undercover Mosque (Part I and II) (Documentary)


Posted by sharia unveiled on December 30, 2014

undercover-mosqueBrace yourself for an amazing journey, deep inside ‘..the fortresses of Islam..’

This 2 part series entitled: ‘Undercover Mosque’ is the result of an extensive undercover investigation that was conducted into the inner workings of Islam’s mosques in our Western nations…

If there was ever any doubt in your mind about the evil teachings of Islam and the willingness of Muslims to carry them out in our societies.. these two hidden camera operations will put them to rest.

 

Part I: Undercover Mosque

Video courtesy of: Dodgygzr

 

Part II: Undercover Mosque – The Return

Posted on 30 Dec 14 by Sharia Unveiled

Advertisements

Digging Out the Graves of Non-Muslims for Vengeance or Looting – A ‘Holy’ Tradition of Prophet Muhammad


Posted by sharia unveiled on June 6, 2014

A Christian Cemetery in Britain, desecrated by Muslims.

A Christian Cemetery in Britain, desecrated by Muslims.

by, Mirza Ghalib | Islam Watch

Recently a Christian father in Egypt was murdered in broad daylight on the street in front of his son by the followers of the ‘religion of peace’. The killing itself didn’t become big news for the world community, as if it is the right of Muslims to oppress and kill non-Muslims in Muslim-majority countries. However, the incident became a news only after the Muslim barbarians did the unimaginable:They dug out the corpse of the murdered Christian father from his grave, dragged it through the streets, and mutilated it.

This incident will certainly be shocking to non-Muslims. It will also be shocking to most of the ignorant Muslims, who bang their heads five times a day, without ever knowing much about their ‘religion’. But had they known Islam, the ‘Religion of peace’, well enough, this incident would not have been shocking or unusual to them. It is indeed a Sunnah, the holy tradition of Prophet Muhammad, left to his followers to emulate for the eternity to come. There are many incidents during the prophet’s time recorded in Sahih Hadiths, wherein Muslims dug out the corpse of non-Muslims from graves as a vengeance or for looting.

Digging out corpse of Muhammad’s rebellious Christian scribe from grave

It was impossible for illiterate Muhammad with a bunch of illiterate and low-class companions to fabricate a holy like the Quran for deceiving the Arabs. So he sought guidance and help from a few educated and knowledgeable Christian and Jewish scribes to write for him his ‘holy’ book by plagiarizing from other scriptures. Beyond that, his dominant method of converting the people was either bribing or terrorizing them. One such Christian scribe later on left him and used to say: “Muhammad knows nothing but what I have written for him”. Muhammad spared nobody who satirized or criticized him, be they men or women, young or old, free or slave. Soon after the rebellious Christian scribe said those things about Muhammad, he was ‘mysteriously’ dead. Whether or not Muhammad’s hand was behind his death, Muhammad certainly did not allow dead-body to ‘rest in peace’ in grave because of his exposing of Muhammad’s embarrassing secrets. After he was buried, the followers of the holy prophet dug out his dead-body repeatedly from his grave until the relatives of the deceased man became fed up and left the body unattended. Here are the hadiths:

Narrated Anas: There was a Christian who embraced Islam and read Surat-al-Baqara and Al-Imran, and he used to write (the revelations) for the Prophet. Later on he returned to Christianity again and he used to say: “Muhammad knows nothing but what I have written for him.” Then ALLAH CAUSED HIM TO DIE, and the people buried him, but in the morning they saw that THE EARTH HAD THROWN HIS BODY OUT. They said, “This is the act of Muhammad and his companions. They dug the grave of our companion and took his body out of it because he had run away from them.” They again dug the grave deeply for him, but in the morning they again saw that the earth had thrown his body out. They said, “This is an act of Muhammad and his companions. They dug the grave of our companion and threw his body outside it, for he had run away from them.” They dug the grave for him as deep as they could, but in the morning they again saw that the earth had thrown his body out. So they believed that what had befallen him was not done by human beings and had to leave him thrown (on the ground). (Sahih Al-Bukhari: 4:56:814)

Anas b. Malik reported: There was a person amongst us who belonged to the tribe of Bani Najjar and he recited Sura al-Baqarah and Surat Al-i-‘Imran and he used to transcribe for Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him). He ran away as a rebel and joined the People of the Book. They gave it much importance and said: He is the person who used to transcribe for Muhammad and they were much pleased with him. Time rolled on that ALLAH CAUSED HIS DEATH. They dug the grave and buried him therein, but they found to their surprise that the earth had thrown him out over the surface. They again dug the grave for him and buried him but the earth again threw him out upon the surface. They again dug the grave for him and buried him but the earth again threw him out upon the surface. At last they left him unburied. (Sahih Muslim/ Book 38/ Hadith 6693)

Please refer to the following hadiths for similar killing orders of other scribes issued by Muhammad. (Sunan Abu Dawud/ Hadith: 2677, 4345 & 4346)

Muhammad’s digging out corpse of the rightful Medina leader, Abdullah ibn Ubay

In another similar incident, Muhammad’s showed his most evil mind by digging out the corpse of his another opponent, Abdullah ibn Ubay, for spitting into dead Abdullah’s mouth. Abdullah was the leader of the city of Medina when Muhammad migrated there. He was of noble birth, and abhorrent toward violence and inclined to peace and justice. As Muhammad’s Muslim gang grew fast after he started raiding and plundering for making a leaving and offered booty to bribe those who would join him, Abdullah became sidelined from the leadership position. He even had to convert to Islam outwardly, but remained respectable in Medina until his death. He opposed Muhammad’s most barbaric actions, often saving thousands of lives from Muhammad’s slaughter—the Banu Qainuqa and Nadir Jews, for example. Barbaric as he was, Muhammad naturally hated him intensely until he died, and showed his hatred toward Abdullah in the most horrifying way in how he dealt with Abdullah’s buried corpse:

Narrated Jabir: The Prophet came to (the grave of) ‘Abdullah bin Ubai after his body was buried. The body was brought out and then the Prophet put his saliva over the body and clothed it in his shirt. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 2:23:360)

Jabir reported Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) came to the grave of ‘Abdullah b. Ubayy, brought him out from that, placed him on his knee and put his saliva in his mouth and shrouded him in his own shirt and Allah knows best. (Sahih Muslim/ Book 38/ hadith 6678)

Readers can learn more about Abdullah ibn Ubay from this article: Death of Noble Abdullah bin Ubayy and the Extreme Meanness of Prophet Muhammad.

MUHAMMAD LOOTED THE GRAVES OF RICH NON-MUSLIMS

Muhammad not only looted the non-Muslims caravans and communities for making a living, but also plundered the graves of rich non-Muslims after their death. The readers may feel stunned to learn about incredible incident:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-’As: When we went out along with the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) to at-Ta’if we passed a grave. I heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: This is the grave of Abu Righal. He was in this sacred mosque (sanctuary) protecting himself (from punishment). When he came out, he suffered the same punishment which his people suffered at this place, and he was buried in it. The sign of it is that a golden bough was buried with him. If you dig it out, you will find it with him. The people hastened to it and took out the bough. (Abu Dawud/ Book 13/ hadith 3082)

Muhammad justifies his digging of graves for looting by blaming the Jews

To water down or justify his most shameful deeds, Muhammad had to invent lies to put the blames on non-Muslims:

Narrated Rabi bin Hirash: ……….Uqba bin ‘Amr said, “I heard him (Muhammad) saying that the Israeli used to dig the grave of the dead (to steal their shrouds).” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 4:56:659)

What an evil genius that Muhammad was!

MUHAMMAD BUILT HIS MADINA MOSQUE CUM HOUSE ON THE GRAVES OF NON-MUSLIMS

Let us end this article with another shameful incident of Muhammad’s disrespect toward the graves of non-Muslims. Even today, Saudi Arabia has millions of square kilometers of unused barren land, and yet he chose to construct his Medina mosque and the living quarters for his community on the burial ground of Banu Najjar, one of the Jewish tribes that living in Medina when Muhammad arrived there. Muhammad ordered to dig out the corpses of deceased Banu Najjar men and women from their graves and built his mosque and living quarter upon it. This is the way Muhammad showed his gratitude toward Banu Najjar, in whose city his community found refuge in times of desperation. There are many hadiths speaks about this incident:

Narrated Anas: The Prophet came to Medina and ordered a mosque to be built and said, “O Bani Najjar! Suggest to me the price (of your land).” They said, “We do not want its price except from Allah” (i.e. they wished for a reward from Allah for giving up their land freely). So, the Prophet ordered the graves of the pagans to be dug out and the land to be leveled, and the date-palm trees to be cut down. The cut date-palms were fixed in the direction of the Qibla of the mosque. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:8:420/3:30:92/ 5:58:269) & (Sahih Muslim: Book4: Hadith1068)

CONCLUSION

Unless Muslims study their sacred religious scriptures and understands the evil teachings and personality of Prophet Muhammad, and the world wakes up to the reality of Islam, and understand how the age-old barbarism of Islam—temporarily in hibernation—is being revived over the past few decades, the future of our children and grandchildren is doomed. The challenge is right in front of us.

The Continued Desecration of Christian Graves at St. Johns Church in Manchester, England:

Video of the continued disrespect by Muslims shown to the Christian dead during an ongoing church to mosque conversion.

Video courtesy of: British Nationalist & Patriot

Posted on 6 Jun 14 by Sharia Unveiled

The Mindset of Muslims


Posted by sharia unveiled on February 25, 2014

muslim-woman-80

by, Abid Ali | Islam Watch

Muslims never read the Qur’an from start to finish with the unprejudiced mind and intent to understand its message. If they do, it will become clear to them that this so-called holy book is not from God, but a fabrication of an evil person and is filled with absurdities and violent incitements. They live in a blissful garden of ignorance, where all their questions are choked by lack of interest to think hard about it. There, they don’t have to think. All they have to do is just believe.

Muslims are not less intelligent or less rational people than anybody else. Their problem is: they somehow manage to put aside their rational thinking when it comes to the Qur’an and Islam. They are satisfied with Islam, and make an abstract ideal image of it in their mind. But that beautiful Islam is THEIR imaginary Islam, not the Islam of Muhammad. That is how Muslims bring themselves to deeply loving Islam. Very few Muslims have read the Qur’an to understand its meaning. Yes they chant it, often in a language that they don’t understand, but few know meaning of what they read. Even fewer are the number of Muslims, who have read the Sira and hadith. The Islam they live is the Islam made up by them. They create the best religion in their mind, and when you tell them the truth about Islam, they see no resemblance of it with the one they have envisioned. Let alone reading and understanding the Qur’an, the majority of the Ummah even do not know the very basics of Islam and Muhammad—for example, they don’t know how many wives Muhammad had, that Muhammad had concubines and slept with them, that he married a six-year-old child and slept with her, that slavery or concubinism is allowed in Islam, and many more such immoralities, insensibilities and inhumanities.

How can they see the truth if they are willing to read only the lies, and refuse to read anything that may create doubt about their belief? Thus, sunk in deception and lies, they tell themselves that if only they had practiced the true Islam, all their problems—social, economic and judicial—will be resolved. They are convinced that the root of their problem is actually the Muslims, not Islam itself.

When I read the Qur’an, I discovered a distinctly different picture than the one I had in my mind. The new picture emerging from the pages of that book was a violent, intolerant, irrational, arrogant religion – a far cry from the religion of peace, equality and tolerance that had been ingrained in my mind.

What would be the reaction of a man who is told that his wife is disloyal to him? How would a child react if he is told that his father is a murderer, a rapist or a thief? A child who adulates his father or a man who loves his wife will not be able to accept it even if all the proofs in the world are shown to him. They would call you a liar and would hate you for hurting him. They would curse you, consider you his enemy, and may even explode in anger and attack you. Or what would be the condition of a man who is dreaming a pleasant dream in his sleep and you wake him up. He would definitely get annoyed. The greater the beauty of the dream, the greater is the pain of the reality. Even though faith is false, it is still sweet. It is very comforting to believe.

It is a natural human tendency to gobble all the praise, no matter how undeserving they may be, and abhor all criticisms. When you tell a person that he looks great, or he is very honest, or he is very just or intelligent, he would generally not mind or question why you say so, but will accept it all without any doubt or question. But when you criticize the selfsame person, even for his betterment, first he would be unwilling to hear them. Even if somehow he hears, he would not accept it, he will raise hundreds of questions, and additionally, there could be frowning and glaring. Similarly, when a Muslim is nurtured with a belief that they are fortunate that they are Muslims, and someday they will go to paradise to live there in peace and tranquility for eternity, they will easily gobble this wishful thinking without any question or doubt. Because it is always pleasant to fantasize a beautiful dream, although it never become a reality.

“A true believer is a person so fanatically committed to a cause that no amount of reality can make him abandon it” –Eric Hoffer

Believing with evidence is knowledge and believing without evidence is superstition. Faith is believing without evidence, so it is superstition. Gullibility and superstition also means believing without evidence. Muslims don’t want to listen or read anything against their faith and assume that their unquestioned belief will be rewarded manifold in the afterlife without ever realizing that unquestioned devotion and belief never lead one to truth or reality. What Muslims assume as ‘Eemaan’ (faith) is actually superstition wrapped in obstinate ignorance and stupidity. It is an art of Self-Deception. One, who is gifted with self-delusion, does not require opium to submerge himself in hallucination. Following or believing some ideology blindly without questioning it is a kind of intellectual slavery. How could the intelligent designer of this universe, of our mind and body, reward stupidity, ignorance and hatred in human beings? Being ignorant and having blind faith can never be rewarded by an intelligent God in heaven. If stupidity and ignorance is rewarded by God, then donkeys will be standing in queue ahead of humans to enter the divine abode.

“Men surrender sooner their rights than their customs and rituals; ridicule knowledge before their beliefs.” – John Stuart Mill

Muslims are truly incapable of questioning the integrity of Islam—maybe because of faith and fear instilled in them. They assume every Islamic teaching, law, and absurdity must be meaningful, transcendental, or rational to God. There must be some reason behind the inhuman and irrational theories or stories which we humans are neither apt to grasp nor are supposed to question, as they are the commands of God, which they have taken for granted. But here, they fail to ponder or realize on what basis they feel so sure of these claims, was it analyzed truth or unanalyzed teachings of their elders, and why God would give such revelation which is beyond the grasp of the majority of the people.

The mind of every Muslim is infused by their elders since childhood with the thought that all non-Muslims—be it the greatest of scientists, philosophers, freethinkers, and theologians of other religions or the common man—are enemies of Muslims, who are eternally engaged in a conspiracy against their religion. Why would anyone be an enemy of particular religion if it does not affect his/her rights is beyond me? Actually, it is Islam that teaches Muslims to be the enemy of the entire world so as to spread its claws of imperialism.

When they hear any critical question against their faith, they believe that there are answers for all the criticisms and questions raised against Islam, but they will never look for those answers nor would they willingly listen to any criticism against their faith which they are very much content and consoled with. Muslims challenge that they will be able to answer all the criticisms, but when you start presenting them with those question, they feel irritated and request you to stop discussing Islam immediately. This has become their instinctive psychological tendency. On one side, people like Zakir Naik boasts and throws challenges about Islam, on the other, Muslims launch Fatwas against such critics, Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasreen being prominent among them. If you silence the voice critics, then what is the use of challenge to defend the veracity of your faith? Islamic apologists are such runners who even run alone would still be the last one to come (the failure). When Taslima Nasreen last came to Hyderabad (India), she was hit & pushed by a group of Muslims. These are exactly the same behaviour their prophet adopted and practiced. To silence opponents, he even killed female poets. In the name faith (Eemaan), they practice every sort of dishonesty (Be-Emaani). Muslims are the worst among humans to practice dishonesty!

quran-15

Muslims are such people, who try to defend their religion even without knowing anything about it. They will firmly claim and boast about the integrity of the Qur’an and Muhammad believing that they would be able to answer and satisfy all criticisms and allegations raised, they will depart promising that very soon they will return with all answers, but that day never comes. For a single critical question about Islam, hundred of Muslims come with hundreds of answers. They do it in the hope that if they try to defend their religion by whatsoever means, they will be adored by Allah for defending His religion. They don’t even understand the basic understanding that a religion of the Omnipotent God never needs to be defended by mortal creatures, such as a ‘Man’.

Whenever they come across any book or article critical to their faith, they immediately shut away from it like a witch closes the aperture of light and refuses to read even a single page saying that this is a misrepresentation of Islam, but themselves would never search, verify or confirm their own claim. Their entire life and faith hinges on hear-say.

In his book, ‘Tell-tell Brain’ V. S. Ramachandran argued about various types of psychological blindness and peculiarities, where one of them I can mention is ‘Metaphor Blindness’ in which a patient cannot understand metaphors or figurative statement. Rather, he would always tell you the literal meaning of the metaphor or proverb. Once such a patient was examined with a proverb, ‘Rome was not built in a day’. When Ramachandran asked him the meaning of the metaphor, he kept on telling the literal meaning of the proverb but could tell figurative one, though the person was educated and wise enough to realize it metaphorical sense. Similarly, Muslims suffer from ‘logical blindness’ when it comes to their faith. Even the most educated Muslims talk in such an irrational manner that it is sometimes difficult to believe whether I am talking to sane person or an insane one. Tell a Muslim about the absurdities of other religions, he would understand it like a smart man but as soon as you replace that religion with Islam, he would immediately be in denial mode or agitated. No matter how you condemn other religions in front of Muslims, they would be delighted and conceited. They make fun of myths and legends of all religions, like ‘Ganesha’, who is a deity with trunk or Ravan, a king with ten heads in Hinduism, but when you talk about absurdity of Mi’raj, he would utterly refuse to agree to illogicality behind the story of Borak, Muhammad’s carrier to haven, that was half-mule and half-donkey with pair of wings. However ridiculous this creature is, to Muslims it is absolutely scientific, rational, proven, tested and verified under scientific spirit and research. This blindness is not inborn but is the result of indoctrination by their elders in their childhood. Literally, Muslims says, ‘kill those who say Islam is a violent religion’. Without ever realizing what irony they utter. Even my brothers, who are not so learned and never did research, said to me that it is their week ‘Eemaan’ that they hear something bad about Islam, else they are supposed to kill anyone who utter anything against their religion and prophet.

The lesser Muslims know about the mumbo-jumbo of the Qur’an, the stronger is their faith in Islam. They believe that the Qur’an has so profound assertions that it is not possible for everybody to understand it, thus it must be divinely inspired. They fail to think over why God would send illogical and incoherent message which is inconceivable to most people.

Muslims gulp down all the lies, absurdities and inhumanities inherent in Islam uncritically. They can’t see anything wrong with their faith as they are determined not to see anything wrong with their faith. Because they consider Muhammad above all, the entire world (rather, they consider, conspire to blaspheme him and is enemy of Islam) can be liar but not he. Muhammad, to them, is the perfect example of human being even when they know he was a pedophile, a mass murderer and a rapist. Islam has thousands fallacies, the Qur’an has numerous errors of all sorts and Muhammad committed countless crimes as per the Qur’an, Hadiths and Sira, still they want to silence whoever raises those points–not with rational answers but by violence, killing, persecuting, banning and banishing, which they have been doing since the inception of Islam. They want to kill whoever speaks the bitter truth about Islam. Sometimes they succeed, sometimes not. They ban and try to ban websites and books exposing flaws of their cherished beliefs, and unfortunately they succeed. Unlike believers of other religions, Muslims organize protest march on roads in rage, agitate and burn embassies, blow buildings, blaze libraries, kill people, ban books and websites, thinking that they are doing it for defending and sustaining the truth, without realizing that all these subjects their faith to more question while a little rational answer can defend their faith much better. On top of these, Muslims, on a regular basis, wake up in the early hours of the morning and perform Wodu (Ablution) with the icy winter water, lose precious time and energy in performing Salah five times a day, and in reading the Qur’an (the most absurd and useless book of all times), work outside home hungry and thirsty entire day during the month of Ramadan. The billion-plus Muslims torture themselves in this manner just for a lie, a lie of a sick man. Such hopes are nothing but a sinister self-deception and a waste of life. A billion-plus people are still lost in this arid desert of ignorance, chasing a mirage in the fear of childish stories of a hell with scorching fire and in the hope of a heaven with rivers of wine, milk and honey and swelling bosomed virgins — all the figment of a unspiritual, barbarous and crafty mind of a man greedy for power, wealth and women.

Muslims believe that the reference of the existence of God, Jinns, magic, spell, ghosts and souls in the Qur’an proves that Islam is the true religion and Muhammad was a true prophet of God. The fact is that these were not new ideas brought by Muhammad. The ideas of God, Jinns, resurrection, magic, spell, and souls etc. were already prevalent before Muhammad’s grand-fathers were born. The scriptures of Jews and Christians are the living evidences. It was not difficult to plagiarize and concoct few theories about God, life and death, prayer, Jinns, soul etc. to concoct a new religion in one’s own name. Question for those, who believe Muhammad to be a prophet of God, is: Did Muhammad said something which was not prevalent before him and is now proven by Modern science? I firmly believe there is nothing at all.

The reason of my precisely knowing the Muslim mindset is not only due to my growing up as a Muslim, but also because I spoke with hundreds of them and discussed about Islam, and because I have broken Islam’s blinding spell on me and liberated myself from its mental enslavement.

Posted on 25 Feb 14 by Sharia Unveiled

Britain Aims to Become Sharia Finance Capital


Critics say Britain’s ambitions are spurring the establishment of a parallel global financial system based on Islamic Sharia law.

By Soeren Kern | Thu, October 31, 2013

xBritain-Islamic-Bank-IPThe first branch of the Islamic Bank of Britain’s (IBB) opened in 2004. IBB is the first bank licensed by Britain that operates entirely in line with sharia law. (Photo: © Reuters)

The London Stock Exchange will be launching a new Islamic bond index in an effort to establish the City of London as one of the world’s leading centers of Islamic finance.

Britain also plans to become the first non-Muslim country to issue sovereign Islamic bonds, known as sukuk, beginning as early as 2014.

The plans are all part of the British government’s strategy to acquire as big a slice as possible of the fast-growing global market of Islamic finance, which operates according to Islamic Sharia law and is growing 50% faster than the conventional banking sector.

Although it is still a fraction of the global investment market — Sharia-compliant assets are estimated to make up only around 1% of the world’s financial assets — Islamic finance is expected to be worth £1.3 trillion (€1.5 trillion; $2 trillion) by 2014, a 150% increase from its value in 2006, according to the World Islamic Banking Competitiveness Report 2012-2013, published in May 2013 by the consultancy Ernst & Young.

But critics say that Britain’s ambitions to attract investments from Muslim countries, companies and individuals are spurring the gradual establishment of a parallel global financial system based on Islamic Sharia law.

British Prime Minister David Cameron announced the plans during a keynote speech at the ninth World Islamic Economic Forum, which was held in London from October 29-31, the first time the event has ever been held outside the Muslim world.

“Already London is the biggest center for Islamic finance outside the Islamic world,” Cameron told the audience of more than 1,800 international political and business leaders from over 115 countries.

“And today our ambition is to go further still. Because I don’t just want London to be a great capital of Islamic finance in the Western world, I want London to stand alongside Dubai and Kuala Lumpur as one of the great capitals of Islamic finance anywhere in the world.”

Cameron said the new Islamic bond index on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) would help stimulate fixed-income investments from Muslim investors — especially investors from oil-rich Persian Gulf countries — by helping them identify which listed companies adhere to Islamic principles.

Investors who practice Islamic finance — which is said to be structured to conform to a strict code of ethics based on the Koran and Sharia law — refuse to invest in companies that are linked to alcohol, gambling, pornography, tobacco, weapons or pork. Islamic finance also forbids collecting or paying interest and requires that deals be based on tangible assets.

Unlike conventional bonds, sukuk are described as investments rather than loans, with the initial payment made from an Islamic investor in the form of a tangible asset such as land. The lender of a sukuk earns money as profit from rent, as in real estate, rather than traditional interest.

Cameron says the British Treasury will issue £200 million (€235 million; $320 million) worth of sukuk as early as 2014. The objective is to enable the government to borrow from Muslim investors. The Treasury plans to issue fixed returns based on the profit made by a given asset, thereby allowing Muslims to invest without breaking Islamic laws forbidding interest-bearing bonds.

The Treasury also said some sukuk bond issues may require the British government to restrict its dealings with Israeli-owned companies in order to attract Muslim money.

Although Britain has already established itself as the leading secondary market for sukuk — the LSE has listed 49 sukuk bonds worth $34 billion during the past five years — such bonds have rarely been issued from local firms and never from the government.

“For years people have been talking about creating an Islamic bond, or sukuk, outside the Islamic world. But it’s never quite happened,” Cameron said. “Changing that is a question of pragmatism and political will. And here in Britain we’ve got both.”

According to Cameron, this “pragmatism and political will” is being influenced by the fact that Islamic finance is “already fundamental” to the success of the British economy. Indeed, it is.

Britain is already the leading Western center for Islamic financial and related professional services. It is a leading provider of Sharia-compliant finance, with reported assets of $19 billion, according to Islamic Finance 2013, a new report published by The City UK, a financial sector lobby group.

Britain is home to 22 Islamic banks, of which six are fully Sharia-compliant. This is substantially more than in any other Western country or offshore center and is more than double the number in the United States.

In addition, 25 law firms are now supplying services in Islamic finance, which is increasingly being used for major infrastructure projects in London.

Islamic investment has financed London’s Shard skyscraper — the tallest building in the European Union — and the 2012 Olympic Village. Middle Eastern investors own Harrods, London’s most famous luxury department store, and the Manchester City football team.

Muslims also invested in projects such as the massive London Gateway port, the redevelopment of Battersea Power Station and Arsenal Football Club’s Emirates Stadium.

Qualifications in Islamic finance are being offered by four professional institutes and at least 16 universities and business schools.

London is also a leader in Islamic retail banking services, with institutions offering a range of Islamic banking products, such as mortgages and car loans.

The growing demand for Islamic retail banking services is being propelled by the demographic transformation taking place in Britain. The Muslim population of Britain will top 3.3 million sometime before the end of 2013 to reach around 5.2% of the overall population of 63 million, according to figures extrapolated from a recent study on the growth of the Muslim population in Europe.

This demographic earthquake — which is being attributed to large-scale immigration, coupled with high Muslim birth rates and growing numbers of British converts — is transforming the country’s business landscape.

More than one-third of all small- and medium-sized companies in London are believed to be Muslim-owned, and British Muslims contribute at least £30 billion to the economy, according to a new report published by the Muslim Council of Britain.

The demographic changes are also contributing to the establishment of parallel Islamic financial and legal systems in British public life.

In 2012, the British government began offering Muslim workers a Sharia-compliant pension fund in the public sector. A new government agency, the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST), will give Muslims who do not already have a company pension the option of investing in the HSBC Life Amanah Pension Fund, a Sharia-compliant pension scheme. The initial target market comprises some 200,000 Muslims in Britain.

In June 2011, Pointon York, an independent financial services company based in Leicestershire in central England, announced that it will begin offering four Sharia-compliant Self-Invested Personal Pensions (SIPP) products that comply with Islamic law.

Pointon York was the first specialist SIPP provider to receive Sharia-compliant accreditation by the Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB), which has pioneered Islamic retail banking in the United Kingdom. The IBB will supervise the entire life-cycle of Pointon York’s pension funds to ensure full compliance with Sharia legal principles.

Muslim families in Britain can already acquire Sharia-compliant baby bonds under the British government’s Child Trust Fund scheme. In 2008, Britain’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) authorized the establishment of the country’s first Islamic insurance company as well as the country’s first Sharia MasterCard, called the Cordoba Gold MasterCard.

In addition, takaful, a type of Islamic insurance, reached a new high in 2012, with premiums estimated to have reached around $30 billion, according to The City UK, the financial services lobby group.

PM Cameron told the economic forum that Britain has also taken steps to ensure that Muslims are not discriminated against by implementing measures ending “double taxation” on Islamic mortgages and introducing alternative forms of student and start-up loans to comply with a ban on interest payments. “Never again should a Muslim in Britain feel unable to go to university because they cannot get a student loan simply because of their religion,” he said.

But some are saying that Britain should go even farther in aligning its financial system with Sharia law. In an interview with the newspaper London24, Jodie Ginsberg of Demos Finance, a financial services research firm, said: “David Cameron is right to throw Britain’s doors open to the Muslim world to showcase our trading wares. But we should also use this forum as an opportunity to consider how the principles of Islamic finance itself, not just the money generated in the Muslim world, might be applied in the UK. Islamic finance is one of the few models successfully to have weathered the 2008 credit crunch and its aftermath.”

Speaking on a stage that included Jordanian King Abdullah and the Sultan of Brunei, Cameron dismissed criticism of increasing foreign ownership in Britain: “I know some people look at foreign companies investing in our businesses, financing our infrastructure or taking over our football clubs and ask, shouldn’t we do something to stop it? Well, let me tell you, the answer is no.”

Posted on 31 Oct 13 by Clarion Project

Now, dogs are being poisoned in Britain, too?


Posted: March 17, 2012 | Author: barenakedislam |

The pets, which belonged to two different households on the same road in Knottingley, West Yorks, suffered fits which left them foaming at the mouth. It is believed they had eaten slabs of blackened meat deliberately left for them, after tests revealed them to be poisoned.

Islam vs Europe says, “We don’t know for sure if this was done by Muslims. But West Yorkshire is one of the most heavily Muslim-colonized parts of Britain. That’s where Bradford is. Also the fact that pork was used each time is very curious. Muslims are not prohibited from handling pork, only eating it. And “pork-eaters” is one of their favorite insults for infidels. In these incidents, the pork element could provide both an extra sadistic twist and a kind of justification; as the Muslim would see it, the dog would have died because it made the immoral choice of eating pork and therefore was the author of its own demise.” (See other cases of Muslims poisoning dogs in links at the bottom)

UK TELEGRAPH  Owners Georgina Wetherall, 34, and Emma McGuire, 27, who live just eight doors apart, now fear more dogs in the road could be targeted and police are warning neighbors to be vigilant. Mrs. Wetherall said the deaths had left her so distraught she was now planning to move out of the road, where she has lived with her family for 14 years.

The apparent attacks began in January this year, when Miss McGuire’s three-month-old Jack Russell puppy Monty was found lifeless in his cage.

Miss McGuire’s three-month-old Jack Russell puppy Monty was found lifeless in his cage

After retracing his steps, she found six pieces of blackened pork loin in the garden, which vets confirmed had been poisoned. Despite her extra vigilance, her other Jack Russell Poppy died just one month later in similar circumstances. Miss McGuire said: “They might only be animals to some people, but they were my animals. They might as well have poisoned me.”

This week, friend and neighbor Mrs. Wetherall came home to find two of her dogs dead and another which foamed at the mouth before having to be put down. The mother-of-three said: “I want to know who has done this. It’s absolutely devastating. Whoever is doing this is the lowest of the low. “They weren’t just dogs, they were my family and I’ve never felt so empty.”

Georgina Wetherall with her daughter Jessica holding their dogs Roxy and Paddy who survived being poisoned

Michael Shewring, a vet from the Bartram and Patrick practice, said post-mortem tests on Mrs. Wetherall’s dogs were not yet complete, but that there were similarities in the symptoms leading to all five deaths. He added: “In the case of Miss McGuire’s dogs, the owners brought in pork loin steaks from the garden which were coated in something suitably evil and suspicious.

“For two dogs to go from young, fit and healthy to seizing uncontrollably, there’s no doubt these dogs were maliciously poisoned.”

Posted on 17 Mar 12 by BNI

HUFFPO DHIMMI* promotes conference on multiculturalism and diversity


Posted: October 12, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam

 

Not surprisingly this Muslim a$$kisser, as are all the leftie loons at Huffington Post, condemns anti-Islamization advocates like the English Defence League and Geert Wilders while calling for ‘tolerance’ for the most bigoted, hateful, intolerant people in the world – Muslims.

*DHIMMI – One who has submitted to the dictates of Islam

Huffington Post  This coming Saturday One Society Many Cultures is staging a timely and important national convention in London.

 

Disturbingly, a severe economic recession in Europe and the US is providing a fertile recruiting ground for dangerous and violent racists like the English Defence League and for anti-Muslim politicians like Geert Wilders in Holland. It is therefore just the right time for a broad political alliance to show a united front against hatred and bigotry and celebrate the diversity of our multicultural communities as they begin come under a sustained attack.

 

Any readers still inclined to believe the EDL’s own propaganda that it is neither racist nor violent should spend a few minutes searching reports on the EDL at Islamophobia Watch or reading this new research report from Dr. Matthew Feldman and colleagues at Northampton University.

 

Similarly, any readers still inclined to be believe that Anders Breivik, the Oslo terrorist, was not also a product of a poisonous and well orchestrated anti-Muslim narrative that comes from the furious pens of influential writers in the US, UK and across

Europe should take the time to read Breivik’s own coherent analysis.

Despite the weight of this evidence I suspect there will be some who will still insist the EDL reserves its vitriol for dangerous Muslim Extremists   and that Anders Breivik is a madman who speaks for no one except himself. These are popular and complacent misconceptions that should not be left unchallenged.

In my own contribution to the convention I will build on arguments made in my new book to expose the myth that mainstream Muslim organizations are extremists and ‘sheep in wolves clothing’ as the EDL, Breivik and the writers who inspire them claim.

 


Regrettably, in doing so, I will be required to highlight the negative role being played by the Coalition Government in it’s counter-terrorism and community cohesion or ‘integration’ strategies. Taking a leaf out of Michael Gove’s influential neo-conservative polemic Celsius 7/7 the government has launched a McCarthyite counter subversion strategy in all but name against Muslim organizations that do not adhere to Gove’s view of British values.

As a recent Spinwatch report The Cold war on British Muslims  makes plain Gove is a key player in a well orchestrated campaign by neo conservative think tanks including Policy Exchange and the Centre for Social Cohesion that guides government policies towards its own Muslim citizens.

 

I saw evidence of this counter-subversion strategy in action yesterday when a Muslim ‘counter-radicalisation’ project approved by the coalition government lectured police officers and community workers about the dangers of ‘non violent extremism’ it wrongly assessed to be causally linked to violence and a threat to community cohesion and ‘integration’.

In consequence many Muslim organizations at the forefront of confronting the EDL and confronting hate crimes and violence of all kinds are being demonized as extremist and a threat to community cohesion. This is well illustrated in Tower Hamlets   where the reality on the ground contradicts the analysis offered by Gove and his colleagues in nearby Westminster.

 

My former police colleagues will need to be brave when standing shoulder to shoulder with Muslim partners now judged uncongenial by government. Fair and effective policing will need to be as tough on far right terrorism, political violence and intimidation as it has been on terrorism and political violence associated with al-Qaeda and fringe Muslim extremists. Police chiefs will need to ensure that counter-terrorism policing takes full account of the threat posed by extremists who share the same ambitions as Anders Breivik if not – to date at least – the Oslo terrorist’s chilling skill.

 

And if police accept the Home Secretary’s view that young Muslims should be ‘prevented’ from becoming radicalized into ‘extremism’ then they should ensure that the same measures are applied to young people joining the English Defence League. Or better still, challenge the government’s notion of ‘prevent’ altogether. Either way, even handedness is essential.

If police go about this task fairly then the small number of terrorists and violent extremists who feed off the unattended political grievances in all our communities will be better isolated, identified and tackled.

 

A focus on anti-Muslim racism is not to ignore racism more generally or to plead for special treatment for Muslims. To the contrary One Society Many Cultures benefits from the role model set by Ken Livingstone who has always insisted that Muslims should simply be treated fairly and equally along with their fellow citizens. Contrary to popular myth, this is all Muslims themselves ever ask for.

 

It is therefore high time decent politicians from all three major parties, trade unionists, anti-racist activists and all of us who want to defend multi-faith, multi-ethnic, multicultural communities applied equal standards and tackled anti-Muslim racism with the same enthusiasm earlier manifestations of racism against minority ethnic communities have been opposed.

 

My police background dictates my research focus and my contribution to the convention. But this is a wide ranging event with speakers from a variety of backgrounds, many with positive and successful accounts of multicultural grass roots experience.

 

Look at the usual far left suspects who are backing this conference:

[UNION DHIMMIS] Billy Hayes General Secretary, Communication Workers Union
Britain’s diversity offers many social, cultural and economic benefits. We must assert that we are one society with many cultures. This important event will be an opportunity to unite trade unions, faith and other communities to celebrate our multicultural heritage and oppose racism, Islamophobia and hatred.

[SELF-LOATHING JUDENRAT DHIMMIS] Edie Friedman Executive Director, Jewish Council for Racial Equality
Britain has a proud tradition of being a haven for those fleeing persecution, tyranny and fear. We must protect that right to refuge. This timely event will celebrate the positive contribution we all make to society.

[MUSLIM RADICALS] Farooq Murad Secretary General, Muslim Council of Britain
Sadly, Islamophobia is an undeniable reality in our society. It is culminating in Mosques being attacked, Muslims being vilified in the media, hatred and violence being encouraged. We are committed to fight this by working with people from all walks of life. We need to celebrate diversity and promote understanding to create a just and cohesive Britain.

[INTELLECTUAL ELITIST DHIMMIS] Michael Rosen poet and playwright
The far-right think that they can rustle up enough bullies and thugs to threaten the peace and security of Muslims. We can’t rely on the government doing anything about this. In fact, we’ve come to expect the opposite: they either keep suspiciously silent, or even worse: deliver speeches full of aggressive and prejudiced talk towards Muslim people. We need trade unionists and activists to come together to keep our streets and lives free of this danger so I welcome this conference on October 15.

[ACADEMIA DHIMMIS] Professor Danny Dorling University of Sheffield
When governments run out of good arguments to explain why their policies are hurting people they look for scapegoats. Suggesting that multiculturalism is a problem is just one way of trying to hide the fact that the rich are getting richer whilst most peoples’ living standards are falling.

Posted on 12 Oct 11 by BNI

FRENCH MUSLIMS USE OUR CASH TO FIGHT BURKHA BAN


Story Image
An unnamed husband and wife claim they were forced to move to Britain from France

Friday June 10,2011
By Cyril Dixon

A FRENCH Muslim couple sparked fury yesterday by using a free legal service paid for by British taxpayers to challenge their country’s controversial burkha ban.

The unnamed husband and wife claim they were forced to move to Britain from France by the new law which prevents women wearing the veil in public.

They want £10,000 damages because the “unnecessary, disproportionate and unlawful” ban breaches their right to free movement across the European Union.

Now based in the West Midlands, they are trying to overturn the law at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

The couple are represented by lawyers from Britain’s Immigration Advisory Service which gets an annual £15million in taxpayers’ cash.

Robina Shah, a Birmingham-based solicitor, has instructed top immigration and public law barrister Ramby de Mello to fight their landmark case.

But last night, Ukip MEP Gerard Batten blamed the costly “mess” on European laws designed to over-ride domestic law.

We are in a mess because we allow EU law to supersede UK law

“We are in a mess because we allow EU law to supersede UK law, and the result is that your internal affairs are in trouble,” he said.

“It’s a nonsense. It should be up to the French to sort out whether they want to ban the burkha in their country or not, and someone should challenge it from within.

“About 10 per cent of the population of France are Muslim. Why don’t they club together and pay for someone to challenge it.”

According to Ms Shah the couple have two daughters and want to remain anonymous in case they suffer “hostility”.

Documents lodged in Strasbourg say they “wish to reside and work in France” because they have family there.

Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/251830/French-Muslims-use-our-cash-to-fight-burkha-banFrench-Muslims-use-our-cash-to-fight-burkha-ban#ixzz1OtS6BmNo

%d bloggers like this: