Obama to Egyptian Christians: Don’t Protest the Brotherhood

June 25, 2013 By Raymond Ibrahim

As Egyptians of all factions prepare to demonstrate in mass against the Muslim Brotherhood and President Morsi’s rule on June 30, the latter has been trying to reduce their numbers, which some predict will be in the millions and eclipse the Tahrir protests that earlier ousted Mubarak. Among other influential Egyptians, Morsi recently called on Coptic Christian Pope Tawadros II to urge his flock, Egypt’s millions of Christians, not to join the June 30 protests.

While that may be expected, more troubling is that the U.S. ambassador to Egypt is also trying to prevent Egyptians from protesting—including the Copts. The June 18th edition of Sadi al-Balad reports that lawyer Ramses Naggar, the Coptic Church’s legal counsel, said that during Patterson’s June 17 meeting with Pope Tawadros, she “asked him to urge the Copts not to participate” in the demonstrations against Morsi and the Brotherhood.

The Pope politely informed her that his spiritual authority over the Copts does not extend to political matters.

Regardless, many Egyptian activists are condemning Patterson for flagrantly behaving like the Muslim Brotherhood’s stooge. Leading opposition activist Shady el-Ghazali Harb said Patterson showed “blatant bias” in favor of Morsi and the Brotherhood, adding that her remarks had earned the U.S. administration “the enmity of the Egyptian people.” Coptic activists like George Ishaq openly told Patterson to “shut up and mind your own business.” And Christian business tycoon Naguib Sawiris—no stranger to Islamist hostility—posted a message on his Twitter account addressed to the ambassador saying “Bless us with your silence.”

Indeed, the U.S. ambassador’s position as the Brotherhood’s lackey is disturbing—and revealing—on several levels. First, all throughout the Middle East, the U.S. has been supporting anyone and everyone opposing their leaders—in Libya against Gaddafi, in Egypt itself against 30-year U.S. ally Mubarak, and now in Syria against Assad. In all these cases, the U.S. has presented its support in the name of the human rights and freedoms of the people against dictatorial leaders.

So why is the Obama administration now asking Christians not to oppose their rulers—in this case, Islamists—who have daily proven themselves corrupt and worse, to the point that millions of Egyptians, most of them Muslims, are trying to oust them?

What’s worse is that the human rights abuses Egypt’s Coptic Christians have been suffering under Muslim Brotherhood rule are significantly worse than the human rights abuses that the average Egyptian suffered under Mubarak—making the Copts’ right to protest even more legitimate, and, if anything, more worthy of U.S support.

Among other things, under Morsi’s rule, the persecution of Copts has practically been legalized, as unprecedented numbers of Christians—men, women, and children—have been arrested, often receiving more than double the maximum prison sentence, under the accusation that they “blasphemed” Islam and/or its prophet . It was also under Morsi’s reign that another unprecedented scandal occurred: the St. Mark Cathedral—holiest site of Coptic Christianity and headquarters to the Pope Tawadros himself—was besieged in broad daylight by Islamic rioters. When security came, they too joined in the attack on the cathedral. And the targeting of Christian children —for abduction, ransom, rape, and/or forced conversion—has also reached unprecedented levels under Morsi. (For more on the plight of the Copts under Morsi’s rule, see my new book Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians .)

Yet despite the fact that if anyone in Egypt has a legitimate human rights concern against the current Egyptian government, it most certainly is the Christian Copts, here is the U.S., in the person of Ms. Patterson, asking them not to join the planned protests.

In other words, and consistent with Obama administration’s doctrine, when Islamists—including rapists and cannibals—wage jihad on secular leaders, the U.S. supports them; when Christians protest Islamist rulers who are making their lives a living hell, the administration asks them to “know their place” and behave like dhimmis, Islam’s appellation for non-Muslim “infidels” who must live as third class “citizens” and never complain about their inferior status.

Posted on 25 Jun 13 by FrontPage Mag

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. Once again, President Sheikh Barack Hussein Obama is trying to become an icon as the Mehdi…by trying now to make sure the Egyptian Coptic Christians stay out the protests against the Muslim Brotherhood’s dictatorship/Shari’a Law push that the Egyptians do not want. Looks like he is doing it because he cares for them and doesn’t want violence against them, but in reality, it is something his Muslim Brotherhood handlers are telling him to do, so they would think he means well and would honor his request…but we know better than that, don’t we?

After all, his Muslim upbringing tells him that death to all non-Muslims…proof…the MB told him to basically get in Egypt into violent riots when they wanted Mubarak out, and he didn’t try to stop anyone from protesting…he doesn’t try to stop the Islamic groups from their daily killing of the Coptic Christians…but now, when there is going to be a huge protest against the MB, Sheikh Obama steps in and now wants there to be peace with the Coptics and the Muslims…you do the math.

But Sheikh Obama will have to realize, he cannot and will not be chosen from the MB to be the Mehdi because he is not a warrior, he is a coward. He relies on warriors, and the Mehdi, or the anti-Christ as Christians know the Mehdi as, is a devout warrior, so sorry Sheikh Obama, the best you can do in Islamic prophecy fulfillment is being the Son of the West.]

Evidence emerging of Rowhani’s radicalism, once approved of hiding Iran nuclear work.

June 19, 2013 at 4:24 pm

Hassan Rouhani’s radicalism is coming to light.

Despite the widespread enthusiasm in world capitals and the media that there is new hope in Iran because a “reformer” has been “elected,” evidence is continuing to emerge that Hassan Rouhani is exactly what I have portrayed him: a dangerous Radical Shia Muslim who is deeply committed to the Ayatollah Khamenei, and Iran’s nuclear program, and to building atomic bombs in secret.

Consider the latest reporting:

• Hassan Rouhani was endorsed by the only Iranian leader ever to publicly call for Israel to be destroyed by nuclear weapons.
• Iran’s Hassan Rowhani rules out halt to uranium enrichment programme (London Telegraph)
• A “Pragmatic” Mullah? (Wall Street Journal) –”[Rouhani] chaired Iran’s National Security Council between 1989 and 2005, meaning he was at the top table when Iran masterminded the 1994 bombing of the Jewish cultural center in Buenos Aires, killing 85 people, and of the Khobar Towers in 1996, killing 19 U.S. airmen. He would also have been intimately familiar with the secret construction of Iran’s illicit nuclear facilities in Arak, Natanz and Isfahan, which weren’t publicly exposed until 2002.” Rouhani also “called on the regime’s basij militia to suppress the student protests of July 1999 ‘mercilessly and monumentally.’ More than a dozen students were killed in those protests, more than 1,000 were arrested, hundreds were tortured, and 70 simply ‘disappeared.’”
• Rohani once approved of hiding Iran atomic work (Reuters)

“Years before he became Iran’s president-elect, Hassan Rowhani spoke approvingly about concealing his nation’s nuclear program and said that when Pakistan got atomic bombs and Brazil began enriching uranium, ‘the world started to work with them,’” reports Reuters. “The comments offer an intriguing window into the past thinking of Rohani, widely seen as a moderate or pragmatic conservative, whose surprise victory in weekend elections to succeed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was perceived by the United States and other Western powers as positive — at least at first glance.”
“Rowhani has said he intends to pursue constructive interaction with the world and ‘more active’ negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program, after his predecessor’s belligerence was met with painful international sanctions and military threats from Israel and the United States,” notes Reuters. “Ultimate decisions on Iran’s nuclear program will remain in the hands of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Western diplomats familiar with Rowhani’s work as chief nuclear negotiator from 2003 to 2005 told Reuters the 64-year-old cleric was no pushover and had always been firmly committed to Iran’s nuclear program. He was secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council from 1989 to 2005. It was in the autumn of 2004 that Rowhani gave a sweeping speech to Iran’s Supreme Cultural Revolution Council called ‘Beyond the Challenges Facing Iran and the IAEA Concerning the Nuclear Dossier.’ In that speech, that is available on the blog Armscontrolwonk.com, Rohani said Iran did not want nuclear weapons.”
“As for building the atomic bomb, we never wanted to move in that direction and we have not yet completely developed our fuel cycle capability,” wrote Rouhani. “This also happens to be our main problem.”
“But he argued in favor of a kind of nuclear fait accompli to force the West to accept Iran’s enrichment capabilities,” noted Reuters. “He also referred to Pakistan’s successful acquisition of nuclear weapons in a positive light.”
“If one day we are able to complete the (nuclear) fuel cycle and the world sees that it has no choice, that we do possess the technology, then the situation will be different,” Rowhani said.
“The world did not want Pakistan to have an atomic bomb or Brazil to have the fuel cycle,” he said. “But Pakistan built its bomb and Brazil has its fuel cycle, and the world started to work with them. Our problem is that we have not achieved either one, but we are standing at the threshold.”
“Rowhani also discussed the decision by Iran to conceal its nuclear activities in the late 1980s and 1990s, when it relied on an illicit nuclear procurement network connected to the father of Pakistan’s atomic weapons program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, to purchase enrichment centrifuge technology. ‘This (concealment) was the intention,’ Rohani said. ‘This never was supposed to be in the open. But in any case, the spies exposed it. We did not want to declare all this.’”
——————————
Posted on 19 Jun 13 by Joel C. Rosenberg’s Blog

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. This is just a though, but because Hassan Rowhani is still a radical, despising Israel, but a reformist radical, he could become the Islamic prophesied mehdi (partly because a lot of leaders in the Middle East are calling him the “Sheikh of Hope”), or, as Christian term it, the Biblically prophesied anti-Christ…too early to tell, but was just a thought. (His last name was changed legally from Feridon to Rouhani {transliterated to Ruhani, Rowhani or Rohani} which means “spiritual”]

Jihad Slashers

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. Wild Bill was off a little in the figures of extremist jihadist Muslims…at least how it is put together in the total number…he says 10% of Muslims are jihadist, but the CIA, FBI and other intelligence organizations in the US has determined that about 20-25% are leaning, and have a high possibility to go that direction. So, actually Wild Bill might not be off, he might be quoting the actual numbers of jihadist right now, but it could get worse, could double if their “mehdi” says to do it.

Now, the US government, with the help of Barack Hussein Obama, and his Muslim Brotherhood handlers, and his bed buddy Eric Holder, are on the brink of doing the exact same thing…prosecuting ALL that talk “bad” about Islam and their religious practices (murder, rape, enslavement, pedophilia).

Remember this…President Barack Hussein Obama is working with the Muslim Brotherhood to CHANGE America, and it isn’t change it to socialism, it is change it to Islamism. Think about, he is purposely killing the dollar(so people would gladly accept converting becoming a Muslim so they didn’t have to pay interest), forced and hid the martial law bill so he could impose martial dictatorship on at anytime, working on taking away gun rights (so the populace cannot form a militia like our Founding Fathers determined was a necessity in America, as well as making it easy for a military takeover of America if need be), is cutting down the US military (to make America very weak in the advent of an attack on America). Do the political/religious math with our current White House regime in office.