• February 2014
    S M T W T F S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    232425262728  
  • Truth about Islam and Shari’a law

  • Blog Stats

    • 205,611 hits
  • Must Read! Click Picture!

  • Must Read: click picture!

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 35 other subscribers
  • Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

    Order the Self Study Course on Political Islam

  • We love & support Israel!!!

  • Get Educated & Educate Others!! Click the Picture!

    CLICK THIS PICTURE!!!

  • Key Strategies for the Counter Jihad!

    Click on image above - read about strategies!

U.S. Gov’t Gives Muslim Brotherhood ‘Farm Subsidies’


By Ryan Mauro | Mon, February 3, 2014

Farmland-HPThe payments are just one of many examples of American taxpayer money being spent to benefit Islamist groups.

The North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity, has been given over $10,000 in farm subsidies since 1998. The payments are just another example of taxpayer money being spent to benefit Islamist groups.

Fox News reports that NAIT is being funded by 34 different government programs and receives subsidies for its two “agricultural” lands that are not being used for agricultural purposes. The report quotes an expert as assessing that NAIT’s activity in this regard is “probably legal,” as shocking as it seems.

NAIT was first identified as a Muslim Brotherhood front by the FBI in the 1980s. A declassified FBI memo documents that a source inside the American Muslim Brotherhood said that NAIT is “under the direction and control of the IKHWAN [Muslim Brotherhood] in the United States has as its ultimate goal political control of all non-Islamic governments in the world.”

Another declassified FBI memo from 1987 states that NAIT is receiving money from Iran, Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries and “many” of its leaders supported the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. The FBI’s source reported on NAIT’s “support of JIHAD (a holy war) in the U.S.” and “support of terrorism in the U.S. to further the revolution.”

A 1991 U.S. Muslim Brotherhood document says its U.S. operations are “kind of a grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.” It lists NAIT as one of “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.”

In 2007, the U.S. government described NAIT as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and labeled it an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorism-financing trial. The designation was upheld in 2009 by a federal judge, but he ruled against the previous public disclosure of the designation. This has been repeatedly misreported, including in the Fox News report, as a lifting of the designation.

NAIT says it holds the titles to over 325 properties in 42 states. The Fox report states that NAIT uses Allied Asset Advisors, a company it owns and shares an address with, to buy mosques.

The subsidies to NAIT were sent to the Islamic Center of Central Missouri Mosque. The mosque’s constitution says it is “entrusted” with NAIT and officially affiliated with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Students Association, two other groups with Muslim Brotherhood origins. Like NAIT, ISNA was also designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial.

According to Fox, the farm subsidies were temporarily halted between 2008 and 2011.

It cannot be argued that NAIT has shed its past extremism. One of its current trustees is Muzammil Siddiqi, a former president of ISNA. In 1996, while president of ISNA, he said Muslims “should participate in the [democratic] system to safeguard our interest and try to bring gradual change…We must not forget that Allah’s rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that direction.”

In 2001, he even called for the brutal judicial system of Sharia to eventually be established in America. He said that Muslims are not required to follow Shari’a’s criminal law when they live in a non-Muslim country, but “Once more people accept Islam, insha’llah, this will lead to the implementation of Sharia in all areas.”

NAIT isn’t the only radical group getting farm subsidies courtesy of American taxpayers. Last year, it was discovered that the Nation of Islam was awarded $103,539 between 2008 and 2011. It also got a $26,357 “community loan” when the Bush Administration was in office.

The funding went to a Nation of Islam charity named Three Years Economic Savings, even though its status with the Illinois Secretary of State is “not in good standing.” The charity also operates under the name of “Muhammad Farms” in Georgia and is listed at Louis Farrakhan’s address.

The Clarion Project also discovered that the U.S. Air Force is paying ISNA for advertisements in its magazine. A spokesperson for the Air Force confirmed to Clarion that $4,800 was spent on two ads to recruit Air Force chaplains. When Clarion provided the spokesperson with documentation about ISNA’s past and asked whether such payments would continue, the spokesperson said:

“The Islamic Society of North America is one of many religious organizations recognized by the Department of Defense that satisfy the ecclesiastical requirements to endorse qualified religious ministry professionals to serve as chaplains within the Military Departments.”

Another example is the radical mosque, Dar al-Hijrah, that has significant links to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Its current imam is an open supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and he preached in favor of violent jihad last year inside a Virginia high school.

In 2010, it was found that the Census Bureau was paying $23,000 per month since 2008 to rent space owned by the mosque. The total contract for the lease was $582,000 through 2010. The discovery prompted members of Congress to demand accountability.

The U.S. Debt Clock has the deficit at over $648 billion and the total debt at over $17 trillion. The Islamist cause is the last thing the U.S. government should be spending money on.

Posted on 3 Feb 14 by Clarion Project

Iranian Warships Headed Towards U.S. Coast


iranian-war-ships-1Iranian Naval Warship Fleet Headed Towards U.S. Coast.

by, Reuters | Yahoo News

An Iranian naval officer said a number of warships had been ordered to approach U.S. maritime borders as a response to the stationing of U.S. vessels in the Gulf, the semi-official FARS news agency reported on Saturday.

“Iran’s military fleet is approaching the United States’ maritime borders, and this move has a message,” the agency quoted Admiral Afshin Rezayee Haddad as saying.

Haddad, described as commander of the Iranian navy’s northern fleet, said the vessels had started their voyage towards the Atlantic Ocean via “waters near South Africa”, FARS reported.

FARS said the plan was part of “Iran’s response to Washington’s beefed up naval presence in the Persian Gulf.”

The FARS report, which carried no details of the vessels, could not be confirmed independently.

In Washington, a U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, cast doubt on any claims that the Iranian ships were approaching U.S. maritime borders. But the official added that “ships are free to operate in international waters.”

The United States and its allies regularly stage naval exercises in the Gulf, saying they want to ensure freedom of navigation in the waterway through which 40 percent of the world’s seaborne oil exports passes.

U.S. military facilities in the region include a base for its Fifth Fleet in the Gulf Arab kingdom of Bahrain.

Iran sees the Gulf as its own backyard and believes it has a legitimate interest in expanding its influence there.

Iranian officials have often said Iran could block the Strait of Hormuz, at the mouth of the Gulf, if it came under military attack over its disputed nuclear program, and the Western war games are seen in the region as an attempt to deter any such move.

FARS said the Iranian navy had been developing its presence in international waters since 2010, regularly launching vessels in the Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden to protect Iranian ships from Somali pirates operating in the area.


:گزارش به فارسی – Report in Persian:

source: Yahoo.com

Posted on 10 Feb by Sharia Unveiled

Virginia: Sheriff won’t stop counterterrorism training at terror-linked CAIR’s request


Who Really Saved Humans From Annihilation (according to Islam)?


Think about this…during Christmas time…some people participate in the Secret Santa activity…you know how that goes…a group of people just pick out name out of a bowl (or equivalent) and does not share the name that they received…then (in some gatherings) during the Christmas party, they covertly put the gift in a place (like their co-worker’s desk for instance), so the recipient doesn’t know who gave it to them…surprise!!! You have a secret gift giver!

Well, it fun and challenging to try and figure out who gave you the gift, who is your behind the scenes present bearer. In Islam, they have the same type of “gift”…and the gift bearing is very surprising.

You see, in Islam, their “Secret Santa” made it where allah would not totally wipe out the entire human beings…so this Islamic benefactor should more appropriately be deemed “The Islamic Savior” because what he has done.

Muslims don’t like to tell people about their “secret savior”, and what he has done for them, because their “secret savior” works behind the scenes. Christians like to broadcast about their Savior all the time, while giving thanks to their Savior. Muslims don’t like to spread the word, nor the actions, nor their thanks to the Islamic secret savior. Even though Muslims do not want to share any information on, or show their gratitude to their secret savior, their “sacred” texts tells us about it.

Was it Allah? No Allah wanted to destroy humans. Was it Muhammed…no because in their text, Sahih Al-Bukhari 2753, Muhammed states…” 2753. Narrated Abu Hurairah L When Allah revealed the Verse: “And warn your tribe (0 Muhammad) of near kindred,” Allah’s Messenger got up and said, “0 Quraish people (or said similar words)! Buy (i.e., save) yourselves (from the
Hell-fire) as I cannot save you from Allah’s punishment; 0 Ban! Abd Manãf! I cannot save you from Allah’s punishment; 0 ‘Abbãs bin ‘Abdul Muttalib! I cannot save you from Allah’s punishment; 0 Saflyya, the aunt of Allah’s Messenger! I cannot save you from Allah’s punishment: 0 Fatima bint Muhammad! Ask me anything from my wealth, but I cannot save you from Allah’s punishment.”(‘)

Let us look at why Allah was going to destroy us in the first place… Sahih Muslim 6621 and 6622:

Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6621-6622 Abu Ayyub Ansari reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: If you were not to commit sins, Allah would have swept you out of existence and would have replaced you by another people who have committed sin, and then asked forgiveness from Allah, and He would have granted them pardon… Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) having said: By Him in Whose Hand is my life, if you were not to commit sin, Allah would sweep you out of existence and He would replace (you by) those people who would commit sin and seek forgiveness from Allah, and He would have pardoned them.”

Allah wants us to sin so that he can forgive us. If we don’t sin, Allah can’t be merciful–he depends on humans to sin so that he can show us his mercy. (It would seem that Allah is not complete without a sinful creation)

So in order to avoid being destroyed by Allah, WE MUST SIN. So how come we’re here now? In Qur’an 2:35-36 and Qur’an 7:19-22:

Qur’an 2:35-36…

Sahih International…
And We said, “O Adam, dwell, you and your wife, in Paradise and eat therefrom in [ease and] abundance from wherever you will. But do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers.”Adam and Eve sinned because Satan tempted them.
If they had not sinned, Allah would have destroyed them.
Thus, Satan saved humanity from destruction from Allah by causing us to sin.”
“But Satan caused them to slip out of it and removed them from that [condition] in which they had been. And We said, ‘Go down, [all of you], as enemies to one another, and you will have upon the earth a place of settlement and provision for a time.’

Qur’an 7:19-22

Sahih International…
And ‘O Adam, dwell, you and your wife, in Paradise and eat from wherever you will but do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers.’”
  “But Satan whispered to them to make apparent to them that which was concealed from them of their private parts. He said, ‘Your Lord did not forbid you this tree except that you become angels or become of the immortal.’”
 ”And he swore [by Allah ] to them, ‘Indeed, I am to you from among the sincere advisors.’”
 ”So he made them fall, through deception. And when they tasted of the tree, their private parts became apparent to them, and they began to fasten together over themselves from the leaves of Paradise. And their Lord called to them, ‘Did I not forbid you from that tree and tell you that Satan is to you a clear enemy?’

Why do we sin today? We sin because satan tempts us. In the Qur’anic sura 15:39 Satan vows to mislead all of humanity, as does the Bible throughout many verses like Genesis 3:15 that tells us that God was going to bring forth a Messiah, and satan wanted to try to stop that.

But if Islam is true, we shouldn’t hate him–we should thank him, because we wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for him–our undercover ally.

Who is Allah’s ultimate nemesis? Someone who doesn’t sin, right?

Sahih Al-Bukhari 3286 — Satan touches everyone in the world, except Jesus.
So Allah can forgive everyone except Jesus, because Jesus disobeyed Allah’s command to disobey him. All Muslim prophets are deemed to be sinless because allah grants them a free downgrade from sin to mistake (Muslim prophets of sinlessness here)…so with allah being a fair and merciful “god”, he would have to take Isa (the Muslim Jesus)’s sinlessness (as a direct disobedience, which is a sin), and change his sin of not sinning, and downgrade it to a mistake, thus, making Isa a sinner (Isa sins by being perfect, allah downgrades his sin to being a mistake, thus putting Isa as perfect and sinless again which is a sin) The penalty for disobeying is to be destroyed…..

Muslims claim to love allah (the god of deception), honor Isa, and hate satan. BUT, on closer inspection:


a.Their god wants us to sin, and threatens to destroy us if we don’t
b. Their Isa is allah ultimate nemesis, refusing to sin, even when God threatens him with annihilation
c. The greatest hero in Islam is the devil himself who saves us from allah’s wrath, by convincing us to sin, so that he (allah) can forgive us, because he (allah) is really desperate to show some mercy.

Posted via youtube and H/T with some commentary from Satan Saves

U.S. Special Operations Commander Ordered Destruction of bin Laden Death Photos


Posted on February 12, 2014 by creeping

For those who might actually believe bin Laden was killed in a raid…and immediately given an Islamic burial at sea. via Judicial Watch.

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that on January 31, 2014, it received documents from the Department of Defense (Pentagon) revealing that within hours of its filing a May 13, 2011, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking photos of the deceased Osama bin Laden, U.S. Special Operations Commander, Admiral William McRaven ordered his subordinates to “destroy” any photos they may have had “immediately.” Judicial Watch had filed a FOIA request for the photos 11 days earlier.

The McRaven email, addressed to “Gentlemen,” instructs:

One particular item that I want to emphasize is photos; particularly UBLs remains. At this point – all photos should have been turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them to the [redacted].

According to the Pentagon documents, McRaven sent his email on “Friday, May 13, 2011 5:09 PM.” The documents do not detail what documents, if any, were destroyed in response to the McRaven directive. The Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit seeking the documents was filed in the United States Court for the District of Columbia only hours earlier. Judicial Watch also announced the filing at a morning press conference.

On May 2, Judicial Watch had filed a FOIA request with the Defense Department seeking “all photographs and/or video recordings of Usama (Osama) Bin Laden taken during and/or after the U.S. military operation in Pakistan on or about May 1, 2011.” Federal law contains broad prohibitions against the “concealment, removal, or mutilation generally” of government records.

The records containing the McRaven “destroy them immediately” email were produced as a result of a June 7, 2013, FOIA request and a subsequent lawsuit against the Defense Department for records relating to reports of the 2011 McRaven purge directive. McRaven’s order was first mentioned at the end of a 2011 draft report by the Pentagon’s inspector general (IG) examining whether the Obama administration gave special access to Hollywood executives planning the film “Zero Dark Thirty.” According the draft report, “ADM McRaven also directed that the names and photographs associated with the raid not be released. This effort included purging the combatant command’s system of all records related to the operation and providing these records to another Government Agency.” The reference to the document purge did not appear in the final IG report.

The move by McRaven to purge the photos appears to have come, at least in part, in response to aggressive efforts by Judicial Watch to obtain images of the deceased bin Laden that President Obama, in a rewrite of federal open records law, had refused to disclose. In addition to its May 2, 2011, FOIA request with the Pentagon Judicial Watch filed an identical request on May 3, 2011, with the CIA. When neither the Defense Department nor the CIA complied with the FOIA requests, Judicial Watch, in June 2011, filed FOIA lawsuits against both agencies. In the course of the litigation, the Pentagon claimed that it had “no records responsive to plaintiff’s request.”

On April 26, 2012, District Court Judge James Boasberg accepted the Obama DOD and CIA arguments, ruling that the images could remain secret while conceding: “Indeed, it makes sense that the more significant an event is to our nation – and the end of bin Laden’s reign of terror certainly ranks high – the more need the public has for full disclosure.” On May 21, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed the District Court decision while conceding that the documents may not have been properly classified. The Supreme Court of the United States subsequently denied Judicial Watch’s petition for a writ of certiorari seeking a review of the issue.

“The McRaven ‘destroy them immediately’ email is a smoking gun, revealing both contempt for the rule of law and the American’s people right to know,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration has tried to cover this scandal up – and our lawsuit exposed it. We demand further investigation of the effort to destroy documents about the bin Laden raid.”

The CIA still has copies. And the NSA certainly has copies of anything sent over the wire, right?

Posted on 12 Feb 14 by Creeping Sharia

Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. There are a number of things that seem to show that Osama bin Laden was not actually killed…I will blog on this in a couple of days (prayerfully) as I do some research.

Florida: “Islamically Permissible” Food Demanded for Muslim Convicts