Virginia: Sheriff won’t stop counterterrorism training at terror-linked CAIR’s request

Florida: “Islamically Permissible” Food Demanded for Muslim Convicts

New York: Walmart enforcing sharia blasphemy law? Fires manager over anti-Muslim post

South Carolina jail changes policy after terror-linked Muslim group complains

Posted on March 18, 2013 by creeping

Legal jihad being waged at a relentless pace by those who want to replace the Constitution with sharia law. via Richland County Jail Changes Policy on Religious Head Coverings

The policy change comes after a Muslim woman reported to a national Muslim advocacy group that she was asked to remove her hijab when she was booked at the jail in December.

The Richland County jail has changed its policy to allow Muslim women to wear religious head coverings after one woman reported to a national Muslim advocacy group that an officer told her to remove hers when she was booked at the jail on New Year’s Eve.

Leaders of the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) made the request for a policy change after the Dec. 31, 2012 incident, which they say was a denial of religious rights.

The Muslim woman complained that a booking officer told her to remove her head covering, called a hijab, so that she could have her photo taken, according to a press release from CAIR. The officer “disregarded the woman’s religious concerns and ‘intimidated’ her into removing her scarf in the presence of a male officer,” according to the release.

In other words, she wanted sharia law to apply.

Jail officials told the woman’s husband that “all Muslim women take off their scarves” when in custody, according to CAIR.

The jail didn’t abide by sharia law.

A March 12 letter from Ronaldo D. Myers, director of the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, explained that officers would no longer ask women to take off religious head coverings.

“As requested, we have reviewed and updated our policies to ensure clarity with our staff on the processing and searching of female detainees of the Muslim faith, and specifically have exempted the wearing of religious headwear from our facility’s ‘Prohibited Acts’ policy,” Myers wrote.

Now the jail abides by sharia law for Muslim women.

CAIR leaders say they are satisfied with the change in Richland County, but that they continue to face the same problem at jails and prisons across the country.

“We welcome the detention center’s decision to allow detainees to exercise their constitutionally-protected religious freedom,” said CAIR National Legal Director Nadhira Al-Khalili. “We have recently received reports of denial of religious rights at correctional institutions in other states and are working to achieve similarly positive resolutions in those cases.”

Notice how the dhimmi reporters fail to tell readers that CAIR is a terror-linked, FBI-banned, unindicted co-conspirator with many of its top leaders in jail on terrorism charges. They also coyly fail to mention the name of the Muslim woman arrested or the charges against her.

She’s just one of a growing number of not-so-pious Muslims landing in South Carolina jails.

Posted 18 Mar 13 by Creeping Sharia

Sharia trumps security concerns of Orange County law enforcement in Muslim/ACLU shakedown

I agree, here in America currently, if anyone breaks the law, they have to suffer the consequences, unless you are a Muslim, then you can get off by suing because of “religious discrimination”…and it works, primarily because of Sheik Obama, who is trying to pave the path for global Islamization, starting with the once super power US.

McDonald’s Pays $700,000 to Dearborn Muslims for Allegedly Serving non-Halal Chicken

LAPD Modifies Surveillance Program After Muslim Complaints

Posted on May 23, 2012 by creeping

An update on this post – Islamist group claims victory over LAPD. See something, say something, something said deleted immediately. via LAPD Modifies SAR Surveillance Program After Muslim Complaints | TheBlaze.com.

So, here’s how the program is changing…

SCPR.org continues with all of the agreed-to changes:

• Any reporting of incidents by law enforcement on individuals or groups must be connected to criminal activity.
• Any surveillance must have a nexus to terrorism.
• Any report that does not meet that standard will be purged from any intelligence gathering mechanism within LAPD.
• The Inspector General of LAPD, who is appointed by a civilian board of commissioners and is independent from LAPD, will audit the SAR program and will make the audit available for public review.
• LAPD will include a means to track racial bias within the SAR reports to determine if there is any ethnic profiling within the program.

“We’re removing noncriminal behavior from SAR reporting, and data on innocuous behavior is being purged,” Muslim Public Affairs Council President Salam Al-Marayati said in an interview with RNS. ”The community engagement model can work; it’s more effective. The mosques have rejected the Al-Qaida ideology of death — that‘s why it’s even more important for law enforcement to partner with the mosques.”

In an effort to ease any worries, Cmdr. Blake Chow, who serves with the LAPD’s counterterrorism bureau, cited these changes as an example of authorities’ efforts to reach out to the Muslim community. Chow pledges that, following the changes, the SAR program will be as robust and effective as always.

(H/T: Religion News Service)

Law enforcement is always bending over and giving reach arounds to one group that only comprises 1% of the population – Muslims. Submission. Dhimmitude. We really are $#%#ed.

Posted on 23 May 12 by Creeping Sharia

Muslim group CAIR urges Kansas governor to allow sharia law

Posted on May 16, 2012 by creeping

It passed the House 120-0 and now the Senate 33-3. Terror-linked CAIR is pressing Kansas’ governor to permit sharia law in Kansas. via CAIR: Kansas Governor Asked Not to Sign Anti-Sharia Bill

 WASHINGTON, May 15, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today called on Muslims and all other Americans who value civil liberties to contact Kansas Governor Sam Brownback to ask that he not sign a bill (House Substitute for Senate Bill 79)

via Kansas lawmakers pass effective ban on Islamic law – Yahoo! News.

KANSAS CITY, Kansas (Reuters) – Kansas lawmakers have passed legislation intended to prevent the state courts or agencies from using Islamic or other non-U.S. laws in making decisions, a measure critics have blasted as an embarrassment to the state.

Critics? Hamas-linked, FBI-banned, IRS-revoked, DOJ-confirmed unindicted co-conspirators to the largest terrorist financing conviction in U.S. history – those are your critics! When will the media do its &*#)ing job?

The legislation, which passed 33-3 in the state Senate on Friday and 120-0 previously in the House, is widely known in Kansas as the “Sharia bill,” because the perceived goal of supporters is to keep Islamic code from being recognized in Kansas.

The bill was sent to Republican Governor Sam Brownback, who has not indicated whether he will sign it.

In interviews on Saturday, a supporter of the bill said it reassured foreigners in Kansas that state laws and the U.S. Constitution will protect them. But an opponent said the bill’s real purpose is to hold Islam out for ridicule.

Kansas Representative Peggy Mast, a lead sponsor of the bill for the past two years, said the goal was to make sure there was no confusion that American laws prevailed on American soil.

Mast said research showed more than 50 cases around the United States where courts or government agencies took laws from Sharia or other legal systems into account in decision-making.

Commonly, they involved divorce, child custody, property division or other cases where the woman was treated unfairly, Mast said.

“I want people of other cultures, when they come to the United States, to know the freedoms they have in regard to women’s and children’s rights,” said Mast, a Republican. “An important part of this bill would be to educate them.”

Roughly 20 states have considered legislation similar to what has passed in Kansas, said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington. Some state legislatures, including Kansas, have passed laws that do not mention Sharia by name, he said.

Hooper said there was a movement by conservative-leaning state legislatures to introduce anti-Islam bills that have no legal foundation.

“Really, the goal seems to be (to demonize) Islam and (to marginalize) American Muslims,” Hooper said. “Some (states) have passed these watered-down bills and declared a great victory. It’s utter nonsense, but if your goal is to promote intolerance, I guess you won.”

And if Allah is your objective, the Prophet is your leader, the Qur’an is your law, jihad is your way, and dying in the way of Allah is your highest hope – then there is no place for you in the United States and you must be stopped. We won’t let you win. 

 The Kansas City area is a hotbed of Hamas support with a growing Islamic problem as we’ve noted many times.

Posted on 16 May 12 by Creeping Sharia

Muslims, Harvard shill for Islam, celebrate sharia law & its “desirable chilling effect” in US

Posted on January 18, 2012 by creeping

via Muslim civil rights advocates celebrate major victory in Oklahoma court

Muslim civil rights activists in the United States are celebrating a major victory in an Oklahoma court. According to Noah Feldman, professor of law at Harvard University, the law would likely discourage similar legislation in at least 20 U.S. states over the past several years.

LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) – A federal appeals court this week agreed with a lower court that blocked an Oklahoma law that would have barred state courts from considering or using Shariah law, the Islamic code of conduct.

Feldman says that the decision “should have a good, positive, desirable chilling effect . It should tell people in those jurisdictions that (similar laws) almost all will be judged unconstitutional.”

The issue began in the November 2010 election, when Oklahomans voted in favor of referendum SQ 755 – described as “a preemptive strike against Sharia Law coming to Oklahoma.”

“The courts shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law,” the amendment read.

Sharia law always has a desirable, chilling effect on freedom. But thanks for clarifying your intentions. Feldman is vehemently pro-sharia, pro-Muslim Brotherhood and it’s a strain embedded in the Obama administration who likely watched closely, if not influenced, the Oklahoma situation from day one. As Christine Brim noted in Sharia Comes to the Supreme Court:

In December, 2006, Kagan hired Noah Feldman, architect of Iraq’s Constitution requiring Shariah, as a star faculty member at Harvard Law School.  On March 16, 2008, Feldman published his controversial article “Why Shariah” in the New York Times Magazine, which promoted “Islamists” –  the Muslim Brotherhood – as a progressive democratic party, and promoted Shariah as a model not just for Muslim-majority countries but for all: “In fact, for most of its history, Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world…”  The article was adapted from his book The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, which was published in late March, 2008.

On September 16, 2008, Kagan whole-heartedly endorsed Feldman’s promotion of the Muslim Brotherhood and Shariah by honoring him with the endowed Bemis Chair in International Law.  Feldman’s speech on receiving the award was revealing: he advocated for an international, “outward interpretation” of the Constitution that could “require the U.S. to confer rights on citizens of other nations,” and allow for an “experimental Constitution.”

As to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist worldwide political organization that Feldman and Kagan support? Their motto is as revealing as Feldman’s speech:

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

Given that slogan, you could well ask if Feldman really meant the Muslim Brotherhood when he wrote about “Islamists” in the book Kagan so admired that she gave him an endowed chair.  And he anticipated that question; in the second footnote in his book he states, “Throughout this book, when I refer to Islamists or Islamism, I have in mind mainstream Sunni Muslim activists loosely aligned with the ideology of the transnational Muslim Brotherhood (MB)…the Brotherhood broadly embraces electoral politics, but without eschewing the use of violence in some circumstances, notably against those whom it defines as invaders in Iraq and Palestine.”

Posted on 18 Jan 12 by Creeping Sharia

Ohio: City council mulls pay raise, promotion for Muslim who chooses mosque over work

Posted on November 30, 2011 by creeping

Fools. via Youngstown News, Youngstown Council mulls pay raise as part of case.

YOUNGSTOWN – City council will consider legislation Wednesday to increase the annual salary of an assistant city prosecutor as part of a settlement reached in a religious- and ethnic- discrimination federal lawsuit filed by the employee.

The ordinance would increase the annual base-pay salary of Basil Ally by $4,000. He would be paid $65,200 a year. Also, he would be named the city’s senior prosecutor if council approves the legislation.

Ally, a Muslim, filed a civil lawsuit in May 2009 against the city, its mayor, law director and city prosecutor, contending he was harassed because of his faith and Middle Eastern descent by co-workers.

Also, Ally’s lawsuit stated he was placed on administrative leave because he attended mosque services on a Friday — something his supervisors agreed to accommodate when he was hired — instead of going to a staff meeting.

A settlement was reached about two weeks ago.

In addition to the pay raise and the new job title, Ally received a $110,000 lump-sum payment to settle the lawsuit. The money will come from Midwest Claims, the city’s insurance company.

The city can’t just increase Ally’s annual salary without council passing legislation to change the city’s master salary ordinance, said Law Director Anthony Farris. That’s why the item is on the agenda for council’s Wednesday meeting, he said.

From our previous post Muslim prosecutor in Ohio charges discrimination:

“Mr. Ally was not discriminated against because of his religion or his religious beliefs,” Guglucello said. “His lawsuit is baseless. Mr. Ally has been accommodated for many, many years by the city to practice his religious beliefs. The city is adamant it does not discriminate against anyone.”

The city accommodated the request to worship on Friday afternoons until the end of 2007, when co-workers complained to city Prosecutor Jay Macejko that Ally “was receiving preferential treatment,” the lawsuit reads.

Now he gets preferential treatment, more money, and a promotion. Litigation jihad is lethal.

Posted on 30 Nov 11 by Creeping Sharia