Appeals court rules Islamic SHARIA law is OK in FLORIDA civil case

Posted on October 26, 2011 by creeping

It’s here folks. It crept in and now it is here. Years of warnings ignored by the masses brainwashed by the CAIR-fed, Islamist-pandering media and leftists who aid and abet the jihad. It is here. What are you going to do about it? An update to this post via Use of Islamic law OK in civil case, judge rules | TBO.com.

A state appeals court has ruled that a Hillsborough County Circuit judge can consider Islamic law to decide a civil case between a mosque and its former trustees.

The decision by the 2nd District Court of Appeal in Lakeland to decline the appeal of the Islamic Education Center of Tampa sends the case back to Hillsborough County Circuit Judge Richard A. Nielsen. Nielsen’s decision in March to allow the case to proceed under “ecclesiastical Islamic law” drew national attention when the ruling was criticized by conservative bloggers.

The case has its roots in 2002, when the mosque ousted four of its founding members; those founding members later sued the mosque. One of the main issues of dispute was who would be responsible for how to spend $2.5 million Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise had paid the mosque for 3.4 acres needed to widen Veterans Expressway.

When he made his March ruling, Nielsen said courts have ruled “that ecclesiastical law controls certain relations between members of a religious organization, whether a church, synagogue, temple or mosque.”

The uproar over the ruling went overboard, said Lee Segal, a Clearwater attorney representing the ousted trustees. He said the ruling follows established legal precedent and does not mean Nielsen is allowing Islamic law to trump U.S. law.

“When the parties agree (before the trial that) they are bound to Islamic law, they can be bound to Islamic law,” Segal said. “As long as what you are agreeing to doesn’t violate the constitution of the United States, you can apply any type of law.”

Though the issue of Islamic law has garnered attention, the legal fight over the lawsuit is complicated, with much of it revolving around the arbitration process.

On Monday, Paul Thanasides, the attorney for the mosque, filed a new motion to dismiss the case because of lack of jurisdiction.

For those who suggest that sharia is ok because both parties are Muslim please note that one of the parties is not interested in abiding by sharia as we noted here – Florida judge orders Muslims to follow sharia law, against their will.

Posted on 28 Oct 11 by creeping sharia

Obama helped usher sharia law, polygamy to Libya (video)

Posted on October 27, 2011 by creeping

Thanks to Obama and NATO using your tax dollars. h/t Elder of Ziyon

 

Flashback: Obama’s anti-gun, pro-sharia legal adviser guides Libya war policy

And we haven’t fact-checked this but interesting none the less…16 Things Libya Will Never See Again

Posted on 27 Oct 11 by creeping sharia

‘Islamophobia’ Defense Succeeds for Muslim Shooter of Australian Cop

Posted on October 17, 2011 by creeping

‘Islamophobia’ Defense Succeeds for Shooter of Aussie Cop:  via Islamist Watch.

An Australian Muslim was acquitted of attempting to kill or grievously injure a police officer, based in part on the judge’s decision that a vague and unsubstantiated “anti-Muslim feeling in the community” had helped make the perpetrator skittish enough to open fire out of fear. The verdict in the non-jury trial came in June, but a suppression order kept it hidden until last month.

On November 8, 2005, four policemen were dispatched to arrest a man identified in publicly available records only as BUSB. Upon being approached in a Sydney suburb, BUSB spun around, pulled out a gun, and fired, hitting a sergeant in the hand. Another officer then shot and wounded BUSB, who was taken into custody.

“The man maintained he did not fire at police but at the horizon in what was intended to be a warning shot so he could flee,” the Daily Telegraph reports. He “testified he was sick at the time and jumpy about surveillance and possible police questions.” Laughable? Yes. But Judge Leonie Flannery accepted the argument, agreeing that BUSB may have fired a “warning shot in panic.” More disturbing is her malformed sentence explaining the purported cause of BUSB’s anxiety:

 

I am not satisfied that he put the Browning [pistol] in his pants because he was planning to shoot his arresting officers, rather he did so because he was concerned for his safety, and the state he was in brought about his illness, his concern that he was going to be arrested, and the climate of anti-Muslim feeling in the community at the time, he believed that he might be harmed by the police.

The context makes her decision even more alarming: the officers had been sent to arrest BUSB on terrorism charges. Judge Flannery’s ruling acknowledges that BUSB “had with him … two loaded guns in connection with the preparation for a terrorist act.” Found to possess jihadist propaganda, weapons, acids, and instructions for explosives, BUSB pleaded guilty to terrorism counts in 2008 and is serving at least 14 years — facts presumably known to Judge Flannery.

That BUSB did not get off scot-free does not excuse the judge for ratifying the defense’s assertion that the shooting was mitigated by “an environment of anti-Muslim feeling, which engendered in the Muslim community a high sense of paranoia.” Islamists often claim that bias against Muslims motivates investigations and prosecutions, but this may be the first criminal case in which “Islamophobia” was successfully employed to defend a Muslim’s violent deeds.

Columnist Gerard Henderson ponders, “Would a Jew be entitled to cite a climate of anti-Semitism in the community as affecting the intention of an act which he/she had committed with respect to police? What about a Hindu?” To ask these questions is to answer them. Jews, Hindus, and others are treated like adults; Muslims frequently are viewed as children lacking self-control.

“Islamophobia” is no longer just a tool to silence critics of Islamism. In at least one jurisdiction, it has morphed into a legal defense for terrorists who shoot cops. If there is any remaining doubt regarding the pernicious trajectory of the “Islamophobia” meme, the above case should dispel it.

It seems just about any “defense” will get Muslims out of legal trouble down under.

Posted on 17 Oct 11 by creeping sharia

UNBELIEVABLE! CAIR wins ‘Anti-Racism’ award for shaking down American companies and citizens with relentless litigation jihad

Posted: October 12, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam

What ‘race’ is Islam? Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated CAIR received the 2011 Mission & Excellence Anti-Racism Award from the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits for working to eliminate prejudice and racism in society.

CAIR-MN has worked on combating employment discrimination (By demanding special accommodations just for Muslims that inconvenience non-Muslims), school harassment (accusing American students of being insensitive to Muslim needs, demanding halal food and special prayer rooms in school), airport profiling (refusing to be scanned or groped by TSA agents because it is against their religion), and other issues of racism and religious discrimination (pretty much everything about American life that offends them) against Minnesota Somali Muslim (criminals) and other Muslims.

 

In other words they sue every company that doesn’t bow down to Muslim religious demands and try to convince Americans that shari’a law is the same as United States law. They say there are 7 million Muslims in America when the US Census 2010 said there were 2.6 million. Perhaps the other 5 million are here illegally?

 

Posted on 13 Oct 11 by BNI

Georgia city adopts sharia-compliant court screening policy

Posted on October 11, 2011 by creeping

…after an expletive-uttering hijabi waged legal jihad on the state. Will it take a bomb or smuggling of some other contraband for common sense to return? via Muslim woman, Douglasville settle lawsuit over her hijab  | ajc.com.

Douglasville has settled a federal lawsuit brought by a woman who was jailed over her Muslim headscarf.

“We think it’s a significant victory for religious freedom,” Azadeh Shahshahani, one of the attorneys representing Lisa Valentine in the case, told the AJC in a phone interview Friday.

“Obviously the manner in which Ms. Valentine was treated was inexcusable and unconstitutional,” said Shahshahani, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia. “We hope that through this settlement, no other people will be subject to this same humiliating treatment Ms. Valentine had to suffer.”

Douglasville agreed to adopt a new court screening policy that allows people with religious head coverings the option of being screened in a private area by a person of the same gender, the ACLU said in a news release. Persons with religious headgear will not be forced to remove them in public and can wear the coverings in court.

That policy mirrors a nonbinding recommendation to local courts made in July 2009 by the Georgia Judicial Council after widespread news reports of the Valentine incident.

Posted on 11 Oct 11 by Creeping Sharia

Muslim sues secretive US agency over security clearance, wife linked to Islamist orgs

Posted on October 10, 2011 by creeping

via Ex-worker sues secretive US agency, alleging bias – Forbes.com.

FAIRFAX, Va. — A former employee has sued one of the government’s most secretive security agencies, alleging he lost his security clearance because his wife attended an Islamic school and worked for a Muslim charity.

Mahmoud Hegab filed the discrimination lawsuit this week in U.S. District Court in Alexandria against the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency at Fort Belvoir.

The Alexandria resident worked at NGA as a budget analyst with a top secret security clearance. But his clearance was revoked in November after he got married. NGA officials told him they were concerned about his wife’s schooling at the Islamic Saudi Academy, a private school in northern Virginia, according to the lawsuit.

Officials also cited her employment with an Islamic charity, Alexandria-based Islamic Relief USA, as a reason for revoking the clearance, the lawsuit alleges.

Also identified as cause for concern was his wife’s participation in a 2003 anti-war rally in Washington sponsored by the ANSWER coalition, a left-wing group that has worked in conjunction with Palestinian activists at times. NGA also cited her time at George Mason University, when she served as president of a student group called Students for Justice in Palestine.

Officials at NGA – which employs 16,000 workers supplying satellite data and other imagery to the military – did not respond to an email seeking comment. All of its employees are required to have a top secret clearance due to the nature of the agency’s work.

The Islamic Saudi Academy is a Saudi-funded school that has been under scrutiny for many years for its anti-American and anti-Israel textbooks, and has produced a convicted jihadi who plotted to kill George W. Bush. Discover the Networks:

Founded in 1984, the Virginia-based Islamic Saudi Academy (ISA) is part of a network of 19 international schools run by the Saudi Arabian government. A bilingual English-Arabic institution situated on two campuses — one (in the town of Fairfax) for pre-kindergarten through first grade, the other (in Alexandria) for grades two through twelve — ISA shares its Internal Revenue Service employer tax ID number with the Saudi Embassy, which owns one of the ISA properties and leases the other. The two ISA campuses have a combined enrollment of approximately 1,000 students, some 28 percent of whom are of Saudi heritage.

ISA is under the direction and influence of the Wahhabi sect of Sunni Islam. As such, it adheres to the educational model followed in Saudi Arabia, whose government is ISA’s principal funder, and whose official government texts are central to ISA coursework. ISA’s religious curriculum was written by Sheik Saleh al-Fawzan, a senior member of the Saudi Religious Council and the author of numerous textbooks used in Saudi schools. According to Ali al-Ahmed, Executive Director of the Washington-based Saudi Institute (a leading Saudi opposition group), Al-Fawzan has “encouraged war against unbelievers.”

In October 2007 the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), an organization established by Congress, issued a press release calling for ISA’s closure pending a thorough USCIRF examination of the school’s textbooks. The release stated that “significant past documented concerns remain about whether what is being taught at the ISA explicitly promotes hate, intolerance and human rights violations, in some cases violence.” But ISA did not comply with requests to make its texts available for review.

…ISA teaches that Jews and Christians are the descendants of apes and swine, respectively; that a Muslim should never establish a close friendship with a non-believer; and that even family members, if they are non-believers, should be abandoned or ignored.

At various times between 2000 and 2002, the ISA website, SaudiAcademy.net, provided links to IslamiCity.com, Islam-QA.com, and Al-Islam.org – websites that commonly issued calls for violent jihad against ”non-believers,” especially Jews. As of August 2008, SaudiAcademy.net contained a link to Arab News.com, a site that lauds both the Islamic Association for Palestine (the former American propaganda wing of Hamas) and Radio Islam (which promotes Mein Kampf and Protocols of the Elders of Zion).

Some notable individuals affiliated with ISA include the following:

• Turki Fasial al Saud: This ISA Board Chairman is also the Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the United States.
• Abdalla I. Al-Shabnan: This ISA Director was arrested in June 2008 because, after he had been informed of the possibility that one of his school’s five-year-old students was being sexually abused, he failed to report the allegation to child-protection authorities as required by law. Al-Shabnan pleaded no contest to misdemeanor charges of failure to report child abuse and obstruction of justice.
• Susan L. Douglass: A former social studies teacher at ISA, Douglass has authored a number of social studies textbooks for the International Institute of Islamic Thought, which in 2002 was raided by the FBI because of its suspected links to terrorism. A practicing Muslim, Douglass has praised Pakistan’s madrassas (religious schools) as “proud symbols of learning,” even though the U.S. government has identified them as institutions that promote hateful extremism.
• Ahmed Omar Abu Ali: ISA’s valedictorian in 1999, Ali was named “Most Likely to Be a Martyr” by his graduating class. After leaving ISA, he joined an al Qaeda cell in Saudi Arabia and plotted to assassinate President George W. Bush. In February 2005 he was indicted on terrorism charges and eventually was sentenced to 30 years in prison.
• Mohammed Osman Idris and Mohammed Hassan El-Yacoubi: According to an FBI criminal complaint, in December 2001 these two ISA graduates set off for Israel, apparently to carry out a suicide bombing mission. During a search conducted by El Al airport security personnel, El-Yacoubi was found to be in possession of a farewell letter from his younger brother, Abdalmuhssin, who himself had attended ISA. Written in Arabic, the letter contained language discussing an attack that was to be carried out against Israelis, possibly in alliance with Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad. In August 2002, Mr. Idris was sentenced to four months in jail for lying on a passport application.
• Ismael Selim Elbarasse: Named as a co-conspirator in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial, this former ISA comptroller has been described by the U.S. government as a “high-ranking” Hamas operative who had financial dealings with Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook. In August 2004, Elbarasse was arrested after police had observed his wife videotaping sensitive parts of Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay Bridge from his vehicle.
• Abdelrazeg Abdalla: In April 2005, this ISA bus driver lost control of his bus with 34 students aboard; the vehicle careened down a hill and crashed into two cars. After the incident, police discovered that Abdalla’s driver’s license recently had been suspended. Moreover, they learned that Abdalla had accrued seven previous moving violations; that he once had been convicted of kidnapping his estranged wife and three-month-old daughter at knifepoint; and that he had been detained for six months by the Department of Homeland Security on undisclosed charges.

Islamic Relief USA is another terror-linked organization, From DtN:

The aforementioned IRW-USA was incorporated in 1993. In addition to its California headquarters, it also maintains regional offices in Totowa, New Jersey, Washington, D.C. and Plano, Texas. The Registered Agent for its incorporation was Kazbek Soobzokov, the former attorney for terror operative Wajdi Ghunaim, who in 2006 called for violence against Jews, was deported from the United States, and was refused entry into Canada after it was discovered that he was a member of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

In 1999, IRW’s main office (in England) received $50,000 from a Canadian group that the U.S. Treasury Department called “a bin Laden front.”  According to Moscow’s Obshchaya Gazeta, IRW has collected and funneled millions of dollars to the Chechen terrorist rebels in Russia, who also have ties to al Qaeda.

Critical defense agencies should remove all potential risks from their ranks. Supporting and defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, sometimes requires such a purge.

Posted on 10 Oct 11 by creeping sharia

Supreme Court Allows Hijabi To Sue Jail Over Headscarf

Posted on October 8, 2011 by creeping

Like Islam itself, Muslims waging legal jihad are relentless. They will tax the system until there is nothing left to tax and sharia is instituted. Even if it takes four years or more. via Supreme Court Allows Woman To Sue Over Headscarf Removal « CBS Los Angeles.

ORANGE COUNTY (AP) — The Supreme Court will let a Muslim woman sue Southern California jailers for making her take off her head scarf in a courthouse holding cell.

The court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Orange County, Calif., officials, who were sued in 2007 by Souhair Khatib.

Khatib had gone to the Orange County Superior Court to ask for more time to complete her community service. But a judge ordered her jailed, and jailers forced Khatib to remove her head scarf.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected arguments that holding cells aren’t covered by a federal law protecting the religious practices of prisoners. It also ruled Khatib had the right to wear the scarf unless jailers could show it was a security risk.

The case was Orange County, Calif., v. Souhair Khatib, 10-1505.

AP doesn’t tell us what Khatib was sentenced to community service for. Why not? Either way, another Muslim criminal forcing sharia on the system. An appeals court previously backed removal of inmate’s headscarf.

Posted on 8 Oct 11 by creeping sharia

Another CAIR shakedown for sharia at Electrolux

Posted on August 26, 2011 by creeping

via PipeLineNews.org, Electrolux Tells CAIR To Stuff It:

August 22, 2011 – San Francisco, CA – CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, an unindicted coconspirator in the nation’s largest and most successful prosecution of domestic Hamas funding, is once again taking on the Electrolux Corp., based [stateside] in Minnesota.

The company employs approximately 150 Muslim workers, whom CAIR has been taking advantage of in order to foment the type of civilizational/cultural jihad proposed by the Muslim Brotherhood and its numerous front groups. [see, document General Strategic Goal For The Group In North America]

CAIR is alleging that the employer is not making reasonable accommodation for Muslims to observe Ramadan. This despite an already extant EEOC mediated settlement of a similar complaint last year. [see, CAIR Strong Arms Electrolux In Minnesota]

Many of Electrolux’ Muslim workers are “political refugees” who were permitted to immigrate to the United States from Somalia, a key al-Qaeda stronghold, under an ill-considered State Dept. program which has been roundly criticized.

Somali immigrants have in large part not been a model of successful acculturation and have a history of precipitating labor disputes [often represented by Islamist groups such as CAIR] in businesses as diverse as Dell Computer, J.B Swift & Co and the Minneapolis airport.

More ominously at least 3 Somali Americans have travelled back to their native land to become suicide bombers for the al-Qaeda linked group, al-Shabaab. [see, http://www.investigativeproject.org/2934/somali-american-becomes-suicide-bomber Somali American Becomes Suicide Bomber]

To many, the prospect of a pressure group advocating on behalf of its constituency is unremarkable however the above outlined type of dispute reflects something far more insidious. It’s a clear demonstration of the ability of Shari’a proponents to employ the West’s numerous freedoms and rights against itself – a seditious stealth weapon – designed to weaken and eventually overturn constitutional government.

Posted on 26 Aug 11 by Creeping Sharia

Hijabi’s legal jihad nets $20K from Abercrombie & Fitch

Posted on July 22, 2011 by creeping

via Jury awards $20,000 in Muslim woman’s employment lawsuit

A federal jury awarded $20,000 in compensatory damages Wednesday to a Tulsa woman who was not hired to work at a local Abercrombie Kids store because she wears a headscarf, but jurors opted not to award her any punitive damages.

$20K takes the distress away…

U.S. District Judge Gregory Frizzell turned down the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s request for an injunction against the company.

Still, Samantha Elauf, 20, said she was “very excited” by the outcome and that she is glad she made her situation public.

The EEOC sued Abercrombie & Fitch on Elauf’s behalf in September 2009, alleging that the company practiced religious discrimination when it chose not to hire her to work at an Abercrombie Kids store at Woodland Hills Mall in June 2008.

She had worn a hijab – or religiously mandated headscarf – to her job interview.

Frizzell ruled last month that the company failed to establish that granting Elauf an exception to its “Look Policy” would have caused it undue hardship.

Because the judge had already found Abercrombie liable, the only issue before the jury was what – if any – damages should be awarded.

EEOC regional attorney Barbara Seely told the jury during her closing argument that Elauf – who was born in the United States – had never been discriminated against before, hasn’t gotten over how she was treated, and will always remember it.

Elauf had testified Tuesday that she felt insulted and disrespected after she discovered that she was not hired because of the scarf.

Seely told the jury that the company wanted its sales associates – or models, as Abercrombie calls them – to look like “cookie-cutter kids.”

Abercrombie attorney Mark Knueve said during his closing argument that diversity is very important to the company and that the organization doesn’t discriminate.

He did say, though, that the company considers its Look Policy a central part of its success, comparing it to Coca-Cola’s secret formula.

Part of the policy prohibits head wear, although the jury heard about several exceptions that had been made during the past few years.

Knueve told the jurors that Elauf should not receive damages, noting that she gained other employment within a few days of not being hired to work at Abercrombie Kids.

While the jury was engaged in what turned out to be more than four hours of deliberations, Frizzell heard testimony and arguments about whether he should issue an injunction against Abercrombie.

Such an injunction would have required the company to notify applicants who wear headscarves to interviews that they may request to be allowed to wear one as a religious accommodation and to provide training to its retail store managers that such notifications must be made.

The injunction also would have required the company to train managers about the company’s obligation to provide religious accommodation to applicants and employees and how to recognize when an applicant might need such an accommodation.

Frizzell noted that Abercrombie has changed its interview procedure so that applicants are now told that the company does not permit its models to sport headwear on the job and are asked if they have any questions about that policy.

Elauf testified Tuesday that she did not ask during her interview for any sort of accommodation that would have allowed her to wear a scarf while on the job, saying she didn’t know it was necessary to bring up the topic.

The EEOC, not Elauf, is the plaintiff in the case, but Seely told the court at a pretrial hearing that any damages would go to Elauf and not to the agency. Frizzell told the jury Wednesday that Elauf has no legal fees to pay connected to the case.

Compensatory damages were sought for the emotional distress Elauf endured because of the discrimination, Seely told the jury.

Knueve did not give a definitive answer when asked whether Abercrombie intends to appeal.

Barring a successful appeal by the company, Elauf plans to save the $20,000 and apply it toward the costs of opening her own clothing store someday, she said.

When asked how it will compare to Abercrombie, a smiling Elauf said, “It’ll be better.”

Seely said Wednesday’s jury verdict was “icing on the cake” for the EEOC after previously winning on the liability issue.

“Samantha Elauf deserves every penny,” Seely said. “She is a courageous young woman who stuck with this case for three years in order to stand up for her rights and the rights of every Muslim woman to work wearing a headscarf.”

Obligatory and useless comment from terrorist-linked CAIR not printed here.

Posted on 22 Jul 11 by Creeping Shari’a

[UPDATED!] LITIGATION JIHAD: Hire a Muslim woman ONLY if you enjoy getting sued

Posted: July 13, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam | Filed under: Islam in America | 13 Comments »

MUSLIM woman sues Duane Reade after she was fired when she showed up for work one day wearing a headbag. Of course, these Muslim bitches never come in for an interview wearing a headbag, only after they are employed for a while. Then they sue you if you don’t like it.

(These kinds of stories are nearing epidemic proportions, and the instigator behind all these fraudulent lawsuits is Terrorist Front Group CAIR)

NY POST – A former Duane Reade employee on Long Island says she was fired when she started wearing a hijab, a traditional Muslim head covering, a lawsuit charges.

Hira Iqbal, 21, claims that boss Errol Smith told her store policy “does not allow people like that” to wear such clothes at work, claims the federal First Amendment lawsuit, filed in Central Islip. A spokesperson for Duane Reade said Iqbal quit and was not fired.

UPDATE: As if you didn’t have enough reasons not to hire muslims, here are 13 more.

Planks Constant (H/T Gerald)

1. Muslim Dunkin Donuts – No Pork on my Fork we read about a Palestinian Arab who sued Dunkin’ Donuts for discrimination against him based on his race by making the sale of breakfast sandwiches with bacon, ham or sausage a mandatory part of his franchise agreement. This is why Muslims cannot assimilate. They seek work for which they are not at all suited, rather they demand that the enterprise suit them.

2. Illegal immigrant Muslim FBI/CIA agent accused of passing info to Hizballah worked in Iraq questioning Al-Qaeda detainees.  It just keeps getting worse: the Keystone Kops idiocy of the FBI and CIA in hiring this woman and employing her in sensitive work is a manifestation of both agencies’ abysmal failure to address the ideological dimension of this conflict. They hardly know what a jihad is, much less know how to question a potential employee to determine her allegiance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism. On Tuesday, she pleaded guilty to conspiracy to illegally search FBI computers for classified information about Hezbollah and to naturalization fraud.

3. You’re standing at the checkout counter at Target; you unload you groceries, milk, bread, bacon, some fruit. The cashier, wearing a Hijab stops at the bacon and calls for help. You wait a few minutes for another worker to come by and help ring up the bacon and put it into a shopping bag. You ask if the cashier is Muslim – she says yes. If this were the Twilight Zone you would understand that you are in a world where up is down and left is right. Why would a Muslim work in a place where she is forbidden to handle pork, alcohol, or other filthy infidel products? Welcome to a Target store in Minnesota.

4. Your flight just landed and you exit the airport heading for a taxi. You are carrying a few bags of gifts from the duty free shop. The cabbie, a Muslim, refuses to take you because he suspects you may be carrying alcohol. The rest of the cabbies are Somali Muslims. What do you do? If you want to get home you’ll have to ditch the booze. That’s what happens to an airport that allows Muslims to be taxi drivers.

5. In Australia, where 2,000 of the 10,000 cabbies are Muslim, comes the story of Muslim taxi drivers refusing to carry blind passengers with their guide dogs because they consider dogs haaram despite the legal requirement for taxi drivers, shops, restaurants, hotels and supermarkets to accept guide dogs.

6. Are Minneapolis Taxi Fares Going To Support Al-Qaeda? In many cases American hospitality has been repaid with a refusal by the Somalis to integrate into the larger society that hosts them, bringing lawsuits and allying themselves with radical Islamist organizations. In fact many Somali Americans seem be intent on reproducing nothing more than “little Mogadishus” wherever they have been resettled. The track record of America’s Somali refugees so far suggests that these people are largely unappreciative of the stunning commitment which has been made to them by the people of the United States.

7. A female Muslim sued a Hair Salon operator for hurt feelings because she wasn’t hired as a hair stylist and was awarded £4,000 in compensation. Why she wasn’t hired? She wouldn’t remove her headscarf and show her hair while working [Radarsite: Muslim job applicant: Hire me or else —]. I suppose Muslim women can now apply for jobs as pilates instructors and refuse to work in anything but a full Hijab and anyone who refuses to hire her will be sued.

8. Electrolux settled a complaint with (who else) the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over an allegation that it failed to allow prayer times for its Muslim employees. The Somali Community Center in Minneapolis had filed the complaint on behalf of 165 workers at Electrolux Home Products in St. Cloud , Minn. Under the settlement, Electrolux agreed to allow the workers time for sunset prayer, provide a Somali translator on occasions when policies or procedures are discussed, give managers and supervisors diversity training, and donate money to a local Islamic center.

9. Two women in Dearborn, Mich., have filed suit after they say a local McDonald’s manager refused them jobs because they wear traditional Islamic dress. “He simply (told me) I had to make a choice and remove my hijab, or I would not be able to establish employment there,” Quiana Pugh said. [DRUDGE Retort] Now why would a Muslim woman want a job when she knows she will be asked to handle a bacon, egg and cheese on occasion? Oh  yeah, L-A-W-S-U-I-T!

10. A Muslim said he is suing Tesco for religious discrimination because he was asked to handle crates of alcohol in a warehouse. Mohammed Ahmed, 32, was employed at the supermarket giant’s Lichfield depot in September last year for a job that included transporting various goods on fork-lift trucks [ifeminists.com].

11. ALCOHOL PRIZE OFFER AMOUNTS TO RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION? – Imran Khan, 25, claimed that the bottles of wine on offer put him at a disadvantage because, as a Muslim, he could not drink alcohol and was therefore unable to claim the prizes. British-born Mr Khan, who works for Direct Line Insurance, is seeking damages for “hurt feelings” under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. Mr Khan’s team leader, Louise Cummings, said she introduced the incentives as a means of “improving staff morale and performance”. “If I had realized that I had hurt anyone’s feelings, then I would have taken steps to rectify that immediately,” she added. Tariq Sadiq, for the company, said that another Muslim worker, who had won an alcoholic prize in a similar scheme, had “simply” exchanged it for an alternative.

12. Muslim sues Met after being told to fry bacon – A Muslim chef is suing the Met police after being asked to cook pork sausages and bacon for breakfast. Hasanali Khoja is accusing the force of religious discrimination after it refused to guarantee that he would not have to handle pork.

13. From the comment section of Jihad Watch, “I have a friend who works in the government run public trustees office…they have had an influx of Muslim employees over the past 5 years…2 years ago there was a notice circulated that employees were no longer allowed to have decorations on their desks or in the workplace such as Christmas or Easter items as this was inflammatory to those employees that were not Christian and did not celebrate those holidays. They were allowed to have “happy holidays” decorations that did not depict any religious or Christmas content. The Muslim employees were provided an area of the office (which was in view of the employees) to pray several times a day along with a person who led prayers out loud…Muslims did not have to be subjected to Christmas decorations once a year but the employees had to be subjected to muslim prayer daily during the work day. CAIR wants a workplace free of religious discrimination…so much for that.”

RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:

american-businesses-hire-a-muslim-and-youre-likely-to-get-sued

it-serves-abercrombie-fitch-right-for-hiring-muslims-they-have-been-sued-by-them-at-least-twice-before

more-legal-jihad-muslim-teen-fired-from-popular-apparel-chain-for-wearing-a-bag-on-her-head

muslim-woman-in-hijab-walks-into-abercrombie-fitch-and-applies-for-a-job

america-gives-back-backlash-against-muslims-who-are-trying-to-make-the-workplace-sharia-compliant

u-s-muslims-complain-that-muslim-women-who-wear-bags-on-their-heads-are-being-discriminated-against-in-the-workplace

legal-jihad-not-hiring-muslim-bagheads-isnt-discrimination-its-called-a-dress-code

legal-jihad-gone-bad-nudie-pix-come-back-to-bite-muslim-woman-in-the-ass

legal-jihad-another-good-reason-for-never-ever-hiring-muslim-employees

how-many-more-reasons-do-people-need-for-not-hiring-muslims

cair-demands-air-france-apologize-for-sending-home-a-muslim-employee-who-refused-to-take-the-bag-off-her-head

muslims-demand-special-religious-accommodations-from-electrolux-for-ramadan

legal-jihad-muslim-airline-worker-sues-firm-because-other-employees-called-him-names

legal-jihad-not-hiring-muslim-bagheads-isnt-discrimination-its-called-a-dress-code

legal-jihad-muslim-woman-sues-nj-hospital-for-not-catering-to-her-religious-demands

listen-up-muslims-we-are-not-afraid-of-you

more-legal-jihad-from-terrorist-front-group-cair

u-s-muslims-complain-that-muslim-women-who-wear-bags-on-their-heads-are-being-discriminated-against-in-the-workplace

legal-jihad-muslim-woman-makes-a-federal-case-out-of-headscarf-ban-in-the-courts

sudden-jihad-syndrome-cover-up

somali-muslim-woman-we-will-fight-them-and-eat-their-flesh

all-americans-must-die-love-somali-muslims-tysons-plant-tennessee

tennessee-hitler-loving-jew-hating-somali-muslim-cab-driver-tries-to-kill-passengers

minnesotastan-santa-banned-from-head-start-classes-for-being-offensive-to-muslims

swift-meat-packing-plant-executives-cave-in-to-muslim-demands-for-ramadan-this-year

somali-muslims-importing-third-world-culture-at-u-s-taxpayer-expense

somali-muslim-immigrants-turning-american-small-towns-into-islamic-welfare-enclaves

terrorist-front-group-cair-demands-investigation-of-trouble-with-somali-muslim-immigrants-in-minnesota-schools

warning-get-into-a-taxi-with-a-somali-muslim-driver-at-your-own-risk

muslims-behaving-badly-in-america

minnesotastan-from-those-wonderful-folks-who-gave-us-the-flying-imams-and-the-first-terrorist-sympathizing-muslim-member-of-the-house-of-representatives

another-good-reason-not-to-employ-muslims

separation-of-mosque-and-state-not-in-minnesotastan

somali-muslims-get-out-of-my-country