Taqqiya of Mike Ghouse: ‘Qur’an Is Not for Muslims’

Frequent guest of Fox’s Sean Hannity and writer at Huffpo. via Taqqiya of Mike Ghouse: ‘Quran Is Not for Muslims’.

Al-Taqiyya is an Islamic doctrine of deceiving non-Muslims in the interest of Islam, which is well-articulated in the Qur’an (3:28, 16:106) and the Sunna (Sahih Bukhari 7:71:662, 4:52:147, 4:53:408). Mike Ghouse is a US-based Muslim, who has mastered the art of al-Taqiyya extremely well. He frequently appears on TV to put a Happy Face on the murderous ideology of Islam to deceive non-Muslims, and has also written a guidebook on Islam to that end, titled “Qur’an is Not For Muslims”.

To introduce his guidebook to Western readers, Ghouse wrote an article in the Huffington Post. The article starts by stating: “First of all, God is not the God of Muslims and no where he claims that in Quran.”

His statement that ‘God is not the God of the Muslims’ can only be deemed correct in the sense that, the Quranic God is not the God of the Universe at all, but a brain of Muhammad himself.

All Muslims, including Ghouse, believes that every word of the Quran is from God transmitted via Angel Gabriel to Muhammad. To them, in this universe, 6 trillion miles and 14 billion light years in expanse and continually expanding, there is only one book written by God Himself, which is the Quran. They regard the Quran as a divine lawbook – the ETERNAL word/teachings of God that are unchangeable (forever). The Quran itself claims to contain all guidance and knowledge that came before Islam and all things (that would to come until the end of the world), revealed by God Himself [Quran 12:111]. Muslims cannot question or doubt a word of God contained in the Quran, which are immutable and will stand valid for all times. Questioning even a single word of the Quran is questioning the credibility of God, and hence blasphemous. A Muslim must dutifully believe it and obey its commands without raising any question or doubt. Therefore, all teachings and sanctions of the Quran must be followed by Muslims until the end of the world. Muslims who question even one word of the Quran become apostates of Islam and must be murdered.

But for the Quran to be the word of God, every command and precept of it must be of moral perfection. The almighty Creator of the Universe cannot sanction unjustified violence, hatred, inequality, terrorism, torture, rape, and sex-slavery etc.

But throughout his essay, Ghouse totally ignores all the violent verses of the Quran. If the verses of abrogation is taken into account, which invalidates all the peaceful verses, the Quran becomes 100% violent and evil.

Ghouse states: “…whereas humans were not put on an autopilot, they were instead given a free will to manage and maintain their own balance, and of course there was the guidance for everyone…”

But the truth is: there is no freewill in Islam. Muslims can be killed (beheaded) if they want to exercise freewill and do any of the following:

1. Reviling Allah or his Messenger;

2. Being sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat’;

3. Denying any verse of the Quran or ‘anything which by scholarly consensus belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it’;

4. Holding that ‘any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent’;

5. Reviling the religion of Islam;

6. Being sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

7. Denying that Allah intended ‘the Prophet’s message to be the religion followed by the entire world.

Muslims who become apostates must be murdered (Quran 4:89). There is no freewill for non-Muslims who refuse to accept Islam. They must be murdered as per Quran 9:5 if they are idol-worshippers; or in the case of Christians/Jews, they submit to Islam, pay a submission tax and live as oppressed dhimmi under Muslim domination [Quran 9:29]. These are just two of the numerous Qur’anic verses, ordering conquest and murder of non-Muslims.

Continuing his lies and deception, Ghouse writes: “God loves us all, and no one is deprived of his love; he has reached out to every human through a peace maker, messenger, prophet, reformer, a wise man or simply a good friend that brings sense to living. The creator offers a variety of guidance to the mankind, no matter where you live, the guidance is there, the guidance that leads to live in peace, and without fear of the other. He says I have sent a peacemaker to every nation and every tribe.”

But the Quran is a book of pure hate. There is no love in the Quran. Not even for Muslims. Islam is all about submission to the psychopathic entity Allah, the brainchild of Muhammad.

Where is the love of God in Islam Mr. Ghouse when Quran 5:33, the verse of barbaric cruelty, states:

“The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom;”

And where is the mercy of God, when adultery and fornication must be punished by flogging with a hundred stripes (or by stoning to death as per the sunnah):

“The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication, – flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by God, if ye believe in God and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.” [Quran 24:2]

Or how can Islam is about love and compassion when God commands murder as retaliation:

“O you who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the slain, the free for the free, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female, but if any remission is made to any one by his (aggrieved) brother, then prosecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner; this is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy; so whoever exceeds the limit after this he shall have a painful chastisement.” [Quran 2.178]

Or when the Quran orders murdering prisoners of war:

“It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise.” [Quran 8:67]

Or when the Quran even orders murdering Muslims, if they refuse to go on jihad:

“Fighting is prescribed for Muslims…”] [Quran 2.216]

and,

“If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you with another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allah is able to do all things.” (Verse 9:39).

So, there is no freewill in Islam. Muslims must murder in the name of Allah. Deviant Muslims who refuse must be murdered by pious Muslims.

---

Read it all…and introduce yourself: @MikeGhouse

Posted on 1 Dec 14 by Creeping Sharia

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. Funny how that works…based on what Mikey says…”The Qur’an isn’t for Muslims” compared to what I have been told, by Muslims…that’s because I own a Qur’an, I am a Muslim (although apostate), just like what is being said with the whitewashing, apologetic CAIR and those groups, concerning President Thomas Jefferson owning a Qur’an, with the exception of him not being an apostate because he had the Qur’an translated and gave copies to American citizens and encouraged them to read it (even though it was so the Americans can learn about their enemies). So, once again, Muslims do what they can to confuse people…it is a spiritual conflict…an evil spirit of confusion to help people go to the side of most talk…]

Top Ten Quran Verses for Understanding ISIS (the Islamic State)

Posted by Acts17Apologetic Acton 7 Sep 14 via YouTube

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. I want everyone to remember this…the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), al Qaeda, and the likes of them are saying that Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is not Islamic, but they created it, and like David Wood points out, ISIS is doing EXACTLY what Mohammed did, and EXACTLY what allah told them to do…you also have to remember the Islamic mandated action called TAQIYYA.

The Arabic word Taqiyya means “deceit” or “dissimulation.” Unlike the Christian or Jewish religions, Sharia-compliant Islam not only permits its believers to lie but actually commands it in some circumstances. For the most part, Muslims are not supposed to lie to one another; but, exceptions are made for smoothing over differences between friends (“He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar,” Bukhari vol. 3:857 p.533.), lying to one’s wife, and lying in warfare. (Recall: Muhammad himself said, ‘War is deceit,” Bukhari vol. 4:267 and 269)

Lying to non-Muslims, though, is another matter. In fact, Islamic law permits Muslims to lie anytime they perceive that their own well-being, or that of Islam, is threatened. Taking it a step further, if there is an objective to be achieved that is desirable in Islam, then it is permissible for Muslims to lie in order to achieve that objective. The book of Islamic law, Reliance of the Traveller (or the ‘Umdat al-Salik), states on pg. 746:

“Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible…”

So, you see, by Islamic law (Shari’a), they are permitted to lie, all to spread the “cause of allah” (proselytizing Islam). And you notice that the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, nor King President Barack Hussein Islama will list ISIS as terrorists, just “misguided” Islamists…what the Muslims groups, especially President Islama and his handlers, the Muslim Brotherhood, (whom he is a member of as well) will no do anything against them, other than what would be considered “collateral damage” to try and make infidels think they are doing something.]

The OIC Denies the Evil of Islamic State

Posted on 2 Sep 14 by Dr. Bill Warner via YouTube

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. The Doctor is correct…ISIS is doing exactly what Mohammed did…you see, the OIC, the Muslim Brotherhood (the creators of ISIS), and all Islamic apologists want to make the world think that ISIS is not Islamic…but in reality, they are, out of the public’s eye, and patting ISIS on the back because, in order to be a true Muslim and be permitted to enter into paradise with Mohammed, a Muslim HAS to follow after Mohammed…if you read the Qur’an or the aHadiths or the sunna (the life of Mohammed), you will see that ISIS is doing exactly what Mohammed did, and what he said they had to do…as well as the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and the OIC are doing exactly what Mohammed told them to do…taqiyya which is to lie to fool people for the cause of allah…do not listen to nor believe the OIC or the MB because they are trying to pass off that ISIS is not obeying the commands of allah.]

If King Obama had a son…

Allah would be pleased…because allah is the “god of skeeming”…after all in the Qur’an it tells Muslims to lie if it advances “allah’s cause”…

Knowing Four Arabic Words May Save Our Civilization from Islamic Takeover

Tuesday, 31 July 2012 | Louis Palme

In 539 BC, King Belshazzar of Babylon saw a dismembered hand-written four prophetic words on the wall. This “handwriting on the wall” was finally interpreted by the prophet Daniel as predicting the fall of the kingdom. He was right. Babylon fell to the Medes-Persians that very night.

Like the “handwriting on the wall” that Prophet Daniel had interpreted, there are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna.

Rembrandt, Belshazzar’s Feast (1635), National Gallery, London

Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims.Muhammad famously said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Number 268)  The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Surah 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Surah 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are wise to your shenanigans. Knock it off!”

Takiyya

Takiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self-defense (illaa an-tattaqu minhum tuqah) (Surah 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim.

Tawriya

Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians.

Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim.

Kitman

Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah.

Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example:

“There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina

“Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina)

Another example:

“Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca

“When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina

Muruna

Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart.

At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism.

Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration.

The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures. However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver.

Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify – as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties – is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.

Imam In Tennessee: Jews And Christians Are Filthy, Their Property Belongs To The Muslim…

Posted on 7/3/2013 by admin

 

This is how the adherents to Basic Islam 101 have to believe.

US based Imam, Yasir Qadhi preaches openly that non Muslims lives are forfeit and their property is legal for Muslims to take in jihad, (and this would include women as sex slaves) yet no charges are brought against him.

Tennessee imam: Jews and Christians filthy, their lives and property can be taken in jihad by the Muslims

Note also his words about jihad, quoting Muhammad: “I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify la illaha illa Allah [there is no god but Allah].”
And Qadhi says: “The life and property of a mushrik [one who worships others besides Allah] holds no value in the state of jihad…which means if they don’t say la illaha illa Allah, their lives and property are halal” — that is, permitted to be taken by the Muslims.

tundratabloids

Posted on 3 Jul 13 by Jews News

Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood leader says “Joooooos” were behind Egyptian overthrow of Mohamed Morsi

Dr. Hammam Said, a leader of Jordan’s Muslim brotherhood, said that Egypt’s coup was planned by the Jews and Arab followers of Iran in order to stop the Arab Spring. 

Because everyone knows that the Jews and the followers of Iran have been BFFs like forever!

Elder of Ziyon  These sorts of articles are all over the place nowadays. Over the weekend Arab media reported that interim Egyptian president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi was really Jewish, saying his mother was a Moroccan Jew who belonged to a Jewish defense organization called “HaMagen” from 1948 to 1950. Another recent article said that Israel, the US and Saudi Arabia colluded to bring Morsi down. 

Posted on 23 Jul 13 by BNI

Four Arabic words every Infidel must know

In 539 BC, King Belshazzar of Babylon saw a dismembered hand-written four prophetic words on the wall. This “handwriting on the wall” was finally interpreted by the prophet Daniel as predicting the fall of the kingdom. He was right. Babylon fell to the Medes-Persians that very night.

Like the “handwriting on the wall” that Hebrew Prophet Daniel had interpreted, there are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are TAQIYYA, TAWRIYA, KITMAN and MURUNA. (emphasis added)

Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims.

Mohammed famously said, “War is deceit.” ( Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Nr.268). The Qur’an boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Qur’an 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Qur’an 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are used to your lying. Knock it off!”

 

TAQIYYA

Taqiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Qur’an that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self-defense (illaan tattaqoo minhum tuqatan)( Qur’an 3:28)

This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.”

________________________________________
Reliance of the Traveller

Reliance of the Traveller. Section r8.2 PERMISSIBLE LYING. The Prophet said: “He who settles disagreements between people to bring about good or says something commendable is not a liar”). Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim. (page 335 in the online Shari’a Law book.)

 

TAWRIYA

Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying” or where appropriate “lying under oath”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath.

Reliance of the Traveller. Section o19.1 If one swears “I will not eat this wheat,” but then makes it into flour or bread (and eats it), one has not broken one’s oath. (page 284 in the online Shari’a Law book.)

Reliance of the Traveller. Section o19.5 When a person swearing an oath about something (in the future, affirming or denying that it will occur) includes the expression “in sha’ Allah (“if Allah will”), before finishing the oath, then the oath is not broken in any event if he thereby intends to provide for exceptions. (page 284 in the online Shari’a Law book.)

Suppose someone protests that Sura 1 of the Qur’an demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of those with whom God is “angry” and “those who have lost their way”.

A Muslim might respond, “Sura 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Sura 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians.

Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim. (It’s the Islamic play on words…it happens a lot and no one really knows about it unless one learns about Islam.)

________________________________________

KITMAN

Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts.

Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Qur’an uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the sura.

Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Qur’an, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse.

Here is an example: “There is no compulsion in religion.” ( Qur’an 2:256)

“Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” ( Qur’an 3:83)

Another example:“Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” ( Qur’an 22:39)

“When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” ( Qur’an 9:5)

And another example: “Anyone who kills a human being… it shall be as though he has killed all mankind. …If anyone saves a life, it shall be as though he has saved the lives of all mankind…” ( Qur’an 5:32)

“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah… that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned;” ( Qur’an 5:33)

________________________________________

MURUNA

Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Qur’an 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.”

Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Qur’an, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart.

At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism.

Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected.

The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration.

The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures.

However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver.

________________________________________

Another example of playing muruna till perfection is Mosab Hassan Yousef, the “Son of Hamas”.

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of a jailed Hamas terrorist leader and MP, Sheikh Hassan Yousef, the most popular figure in that extremist Islamic organization. Mosab, as a young man, assisted his father for years in his political activities.

He converted to Christianity and operated under cover in the service of Israel’s intelligence agency for a decade. Yousef reveals this information in his book, “Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices.”

Mosab however, did not convert to what the West would recognize as Christianity, but to a fiery, Palestinian brand of the faith that is vehemently anti-Israel. According to Mosab, his main goal in coming to the U.S. is to infiltrate the main source of international support for Israel: the American church. From an interview with Al-Arabiya:

“During my tours in universities and even churches, [I found] the real support for Israel stems from the church in the West….. We need to understand the difference between “revenge” and “resistance” and once the Palestinians do, we will have our victory against Israel.”

Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify – as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties – is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.

Ref.:

Louis Palme

Pamela Geller

(H/T Truthsite)

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. I want to thank the folks from Truthsite….they did an awesome job with deciphering what the four main Shari’a mandated words in Islam are…and now, with the encouragement from the Truthsite folks, I want to spread this info to the un-Islamically informed, as well as the Islamically informed…because it is very good knowledge to learn what undercover Muslims in high places in our government are doing because they are mandated by the false god allah.

Our president is a behind the scenes Muslims, and contrary to what most people are thinking his “Change” is…it isn’t socialism, it’s Shari’aism. Why do you think his cabinet has the most active Muslims and Muslim sympathizers in America? Why do you think he puts Muslims into positions in the Court system or into Intelligence, or into training the military to one point or another? He is following his religious, mandated beliefs…lie and deceive…and it is working very well for him because the average American is politically correctly stupid and blind.]

Obama’s Snooping Excludes Mosques, Missed Boston Bombers

Posted 06/12/2013 06:34 PM ET

Homeland Insecurity: The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.

That’s right, the government’s sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.

Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover sting operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.

Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.

We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel’s formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.

If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshiped.

The bureau didn’t even contact mosque leaders for help in identifying their images after those images were captured on closed-circuit TV cameras and cellphones.

One of the Muslim bombers made extremist outbursts during worship, yet because the mosque wasn’t monitored, red flags didn’t go off inside the FBI about his increasing radicalization before the attacks.

This is particularly disturbing in light of recent independent surveys of American mosques, which reveal some 80% of them preach violent jihad or distribute violent literature to worshipers.
What other five-alarm jihadists are counterterrorism officials missing right now, thanks to restrictions on monitoring the one area they should be monitoring?

Posted on 12 Jun 13 by Investors.com

(h/t to Joe Miller/Restoring Liberty)

[Editor’s Note: This does not necessarily entail the beliefs, thoughts, or theories of the local Act chapters or the National Act office…they are my beliefs, thoughts and/or theories. How does this work…Sheikh Obama tells us that the War on Terror is over, but he has the NSA take cellphone account info (so the government can listen to all phone calls) and take bank account info and credit card info (to see what everyone is buying) to prevent terrorists from attacking…thought the mehdi said the War of Terror was over…sad thing, Muslims and mosques are exempted from his “spying”, so only NON-MUSLIMS are affected by this.

Some people say he is just trying to become king, but in reality, knowing that he is Muslim and a Muslim Brotherhood puppet, he is doing what the Qur’an and Shari’a (Islamic) Law tells him to do…lie to (or mislead) non-Muslims into thinking you are working for them so they give in to what you’re doing and eventually turn to allah for his cause.

No, Obama is doing a lot of things right now to push America into becoming a Muslim country…he is working on killing the economy so we would want to go to Shari’a finance, he is taking away 1st and 2nd Amendments of freedom from us, he is violating his oath of office so he can cater to his Muslim Brotherhood handlers to help them take over the world, he has taking out privacy (cell phone and bank/credit card accounts) to spy on us, he is allowing Muslims to be exempt from all the aforementioned. All this lines up with Shari’a Law. He is operating in Islamic justice, which means that Muslims are better than everyone else, so they get privies and are not looked at, only kuffars (non-Muslims).

So, in knowing Islam, and what the Qur’an, ahadith, Shari’a Law, and the Sira (all of which are the Islamic “sacred” text) Obama isn’t trying to be a tyrannical, dictator type king, he is doing what he can to be the tyrannical, dictator type mehdi. This is why, out of all the previous individuals in history (Nero, Napoleon, Hitler) that score points for being the anti-Christ, but Obama not only scores more points for being the anti-Christ (I am not say he is, just stating his actions is all), but he scores points for being the Mehdi as well, which the other “anti-Christ” figures did not meet at all. So, Sheikh Obama is not trying to become a king, he wants to be the mehdi.]

U.S. Government Allows Muslims to Determine What American Textbooks Are Allowed To Say About Islam

I’m sure it sounded reasonable in the beginning — history book publishers of U.S. textbooks should consult with Muslims when they write anything about Islam, just to make sure it is correct. Check with the experts on the subject.

But the Muslims involved in influencing what is being taught to junior high and high school students in the United States are first of all, not history experts, and second of all, they are deliberately editing the information to give a falsely positive view of Islamic doctrine and history. In the interests of multiculturalism, some schools go much further and actually insist their students practice Islam!

Looking at the long term, if you were an Islamic supremacist and you wanted to soften up Americans for an eventual takeover, and if you wanted to keep them from stopping you until it’s too late, you would be hard pressed to find a more promising project than influencing school children to think Islam is benign. These future American leaders and voters will not be very willing to learn about the real nature and scope of the third jihad.

This astonishing situation in our school system is documented thoroughly in a new investigative report produced by a partnership of the Mission Viejo chapter of ACT for America and the United American Committee. Read the whole report here: Islam in America’s Classrooms: History or Propaganda? (PDF document).

Posted in Mar 09 by Citizen Warrior