South Carolina jail changes policy after terror-linked Muslim group complains

Posted on March 18, 2013 by creeping

Legal jihad being waged at a relentless pace by those who want to replace the Constitution with sharia law. via Richland County Jail Changes Policy on Religious Head Coverings

The policy change comes after a Muslim woman reported to a national Muslim advocacy group that she was asked to remove her hijab when she was booked at the jail in December.

The Richland County jail has changed its policy to allow Muslim women to wear religious head coverings after one woman reported to a national Muslim advocacy group that an officer told her to remove hers when she was booked at the jail on New Year’s Eve.

Leaders of the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) made the request for a policy change after the Dec. 31, 2012 incident, which they say was a denial of religious rights.

The Muslim woman complained that a booking officer told her to remove her head covering, called a hijab, so that she could have her photo taken, according to a press release from CAIR. The officer “disregarded the woman’s religious concerns and ‘intimidated’ her into removing her scarf in the presence of a male officer,” according to the release.

In other words, she wanted sharia law to apply.

Jail officials told the woman’s husband that “all Muslim women take off their scarves” when in custody, according to CAIR.

The jail didn’t abide by sharia law.

A March 12 letter from Ronaldo D. Myers, director of the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, explained that officers would no longer ask women to take off religious head coverings.

“As requested, we have reviewed and updated our policies to ensure clarity with our staff on the processing and searching of female detainees of the Muslim faith, and specifically have exempted the wearing of religious headwear from our facility’s ‘Prohibited Acts’ policy,” Myers wrote.

Now the jail abides by sharia law for Muslim women.

CAIR leaders say they are satisfied with the change in Richland County, but that they continue to face the same problem at jails and prisons across the country.

“We welcome the detention center’s decision to allow detainees to exercise their constitutionally-protected religious freedom,” said CAIR National Legal Director Nadhira Al-Khalili. “We have recently received reports of denial of religious rights at correctional institutions in other states and are working to achieve similarly positive resolutions in those cases.”

Notice how the dhimmi reporters fail to tell readers that CAIR is a terror-linked, FBI-banned, unindicted co-conspirator with many of its top leaders in jail on terrorism charges. They also coyly fail to mention the name of the Muslim woman arrested or the charges against her.

She’s just one of a growing number of not-so-pious Muslims landing in South Carolina jails.

Posted 18 Mar 13 by Creeping Sharia

Sharia trumps security concerns of Orange County law enforcement in Muslim/ACLU shakedown

I agree, here in America currently, if anyone breaks the law, they have to suffer the consequences, unless you are a Muslim, then you can get off by suing because of “religious discrimination”…and it works, primarily because of Sheik Obama, who is trying to pave the path for global Islamization, starting with the once super power US.

McDonald’s Pays $700,000 to Dearborn Muslims for Allegedly Serving non-Halal Chicken

Remember our fallen soldiers/sailors/airmen…they made us free

Starting in 1776, and continuing through today, the United States of America had freedom because people volunteered to give their lives so people could live in a free country, void of totalitarianism and tyrants, dictators and supreme caliphs or kings. These volunteers did not die for socialism, communism, or Islamic ideals, they died for FREEDOM, plain and simple…with this freedom there came a need for a leader of this country, and we started off with leaders that feared and trusted the great and omnipotent El Shaddai, Hashem, which is the Judaism/Christian God Almighty, then we started the downhill trek to allowing other god’s in our country, as well as atheism, and now we have a country that does not really believe in the true God (YHVH, Hashem, El Shaddai) but believe primarily in the god of self and the god of money. The worst thing is that we have a leader now in office that is trying to “change” our Christian/Judaism foundation  into a country of his beliefs, one that entails honor (which is a good thing, because a lot of American’s no longer have that) but also entails dictatorship, authorized killing because of “honor”, extortion, authorized killing if you don’t believe the same way this religion does (which the religion includes premarital sex, abortion, homosexuality, consumption of alcohol, use of drugs, rape, marital affairs, pedophilia marriages, incest, to name some…most of which will result in death if you violate it)…American military that have given their lives did not fight for this kind of country, they fought and died for freedom. If we wanted this kind of life we would have never had the Revolution, we would have remained part of tyranny and dictatorship, but we wanted freedom, and they died for that…following after Jesus Christ. He died voluntarily for us to be free from sin and hell, and we make the choice if we want to accept Him or follow after the world and live a life of bondage. That is the spiritual aspect of life, and the current aspect of life is fight Islam, or become an Islamic convert or at least an extortion paying subservient to an Islamic dictator.

The books of Daniel, Zechariah and Revelation tells us that there will be an Islamic dictator that has overtaken the world and forced everyone to bow down to him…the Bible calls this person the anti-christ because he is the son of satan himself, and, as everyone knows, satan got exited out of heaven because a foul demonic person because he thought he was better than God. The Qur’an tells us this identically matched end-time person is called the Mahdi, but in Islam’s ideology, he is the messiah, that will kill all that do not accept him as God. So see, fighting Islam is a necessity in helping keep satan’s son out of America as much as possible, the American  military, deceased or not, did[is] not fight[ing], for satan to rule America.

Posted on 28 May 12 by retired Don

LAPD Modifies Surveillance Program After Muslim Complaints

Posted on May 23, 2012 by creeping

An update on this post – Islamist group claims victory over LAPD. See something, say something, something said deleted immediately. via LAPD Modifies SAR Surveillance Program After Muslim Complaints | TheBlaze.com.

So, here’s how the program is changing…

SCPR.org continues with all of the agreed-to changes:

• Any reporting of incidents by law enforcement on individuals or groups must be connected to criminal activity.
• Any surveillance must have a nexus to terrorism.
• Any report that does not meet that standard will be purged from any intelligence gathering mechanism within LAPD.
• The Inspector General of LAPD, who is appointed by a civilian board of commissioners and is independent from LAPD, will audit the SAR program and will make the audit available for public review.
• LAPD will include a means to track racial bias within the SAR reports to determine if there is any ethnic profiling within the program.

“We’re removing noncriminal behavior from SAR reporting, and data on innocuous behavior is being purged,” Muslim Public Affairs Council President Salam Al-Marayati said in an interview with RNS. ”The community engagement model can work; it’s more effective. The mosques have rejected the Al-Qaida ideology of death — that‘s why it’s even more important for law enforcement to partner with the mosques.”

In an effort to ease any worries, Cmdr. Blake Chow, who serves with the LAPD’s counterterrorism bureau, cited these changes as an example of authorities’ efforts to reach out to the Muslim community. Chow pledges that, following the changes, the SAR program will be as robust and effective as always.

(H/T: Religion News Service)

Law enforcement is always bending over and giving reach arounds to one group that only comprises 1% of the population – Muslims. Submission. Dhimmitude. We really are $#%#ed.

Posted on 23 May 12 by Creeping Sharia

Muslim group CAIR urges Kansas governor to allow sharia law

Posted on May 16, 2012 by creeping

It passed the House 120-0 and now the Senate 33-3. Terror-linked CAIR is pressing Kansas’ governor to permit sharia law in Kansas. via CAIR: Kansas Governor Asked Not to Sign Anti-Sharia Bill

 WASHINGTON, May 15, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today called on Muslims and all other Americans who value civil liberties to contact Kansas Governor Sam Brownback to ask that he not sign a bill (House Substitute for Senate Bill 79)

via Kansas lawmakers pass effective ban on Islamic law – Yahoo! News.

KANSAS CITY, Kansas (Reuters) – Kansas lawmakers have passed legislation intended to prevent the state courts or agencies from using Islamic or other non-U.S. laws in making decisions, a measure critics have blasted as an embarrassment to the state.

Critics? Hamas-linked, FBI-banned, IRS-revoked, DOJ-confirmed unindicted co-conspirators to the largest terrorist financing conviction in U.S. history – those are your critics! When will the media do its &*#)ing job?

The legislation, which passed 33-3 in the state Senate on Friday and 120-0 previously in the House, is widely known in Kansas as the “Sharia bill,” because the perceived goal of supporters is to keep Islamic code from being recognized in Kansas.

The bill was sent to Republican Governor Sam Brownback, who has not indicated whether he will sign it.

In interviews on Saturday, a supporter of the bill said it reassured foreigners in Kansas that state laws and the U.S. Constitution will protect them. But an opponent said the bill’s real purpose is to hold Islam out for ridicule.

Kansas Representative Peggy Mast, a lead sponsor of the bill for the past two years, said the goal was to make sure there was no confusion that American laws prevailed on American soil.

Mast said research showed more than 50 cases around the United States where courts or government agencies took laws from Sharia or other legal systems into account in decision-making.

Commonly, they involved divorce, child custody, property division or other cases where the woman was treated unfairly, Mast said.

“I want people of other cultures, when they come to the United States, to know the freedoms they have in regard to women’s and children’s rights,” said Mast, a Republican. “An important part of this bill would be to educate them.”

Roughly 20 states have considered legislation similar to what has passed in Kansas, said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington. Some state legislatures, including Kansas, have passed laws that do not mention Sharia by name, he said.

Hooper said there was a movement by conservative-leaning state legislatures to introduce anti-Islam bills that have no legal foundation.

“Really, the goal seems to be (to demonize) Islam and (to marginalize) American Muslims,” Hooper said. “Some (states) have passed these watered-down bills and declared a great victory. It’s utter nonsense, but if your goal is to promote intolerance, I guess you won.”

And if Allah is your objective, the Prophet is your leader, the Qur’an is your law, jihad is your way, and dying in the way of Allah is your highest hope – then there is no place for you in the United States and you must be stopped. We won’t let you win. 

 The Kansas City area is a hotbed of Hamas support with a growing Islamic problem as we’ve noted many times.

Posted on 16 May 12 by Creeping Sharia

Muslims, Harvard shill for Islam, celebrate sharia law & its “desirable chilling effect” in US

Posted on January 18, 2012 by creeping

via Muslim civil rights advocates celebrate major victory in Oklahoma court

Muslim civil rights activists in the United States are celebrating a major victory in an Oklahoma court. According to Noah Feldman, professor of law at Harvard University, the law would likely discourage similar legislation in at least 20 U.S. states over the past several years.

LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) – A federal appeals court this week agreed with a lower court that blocked an Oklahoma law that would have barred state courts from considering or using Shariah law, the Islamic code of conduct.

Feldman says that the decision “should have a good, positive, desirable chilling effect . It should tell people in those jurisdictions that (similar laws) almost all will be judged unconstitutional.”

The issue began in the November 2010 election, when Oklahomans voted in favor of referendum SQ 755 – described as “a preemptive strike against Sharia Law coming to Oklahoma.”

“The courts shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law,” the amendment read.

Sharia law always has a desirable, chilling effect on freedom. But thanks for clarifying your intentions. Feldman is vehemently pro-sharia, pro-Muslim Brotherhood and it’s a strain embedded in the Obama administration who likely watched closely, if not influenced, the Oklahoma situation from day one. As Christine Brim noted in Sharia Comes to the Supreme Court:

In December, 2006, Kagan hired Noah Feldman, architect of Iraq’s Constitution requiring Shariah, as a star faculty member at Harvard Law School.  On March 16, 2008, Feldman published his controversial article “Why Shariah” in the New York Times Magazine, which promoted “Islamists” –  the Muslim Brotherhood – as a progressive democratic party, and promoted Shariah as a model not just for Muslim-majority countries but for all: “In fact, for most of its history, Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world…”  The article was adapted from his book The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, which was published in late March, 2008.

On September 16, 2008, Kagan whole-heartedly endorsed Feldman’s promotion of the Muslim Brotherhood and Shariah by honoring him with the endowed Bemis Chair in International Law.  Feldman’s speech on receiving the award was revealing: he advocated for an international, “outward interpretation” of the Constitution that could “require the U.S. to confer rights on citizens of other nations,” and allow for an “experimental Constitution.”

As to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist worldwide political organization that Feldman and Kagan support? Their motto is as revealing as Feldman’s speech:

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

Given that slogan, you could well ask if Feldman really meant the Muslim Brotherhood when he wrote about “Islamists” in the book Kagan so admired that she gave him an endowed chair.  And he anticipated that question; in the second footnote in his book he states, “Throughout this book, when I refer to Islamists or Islamism, I have in mind mainstream Sunni Muslim activists loosely aligned with the ideology of the transnational Muslim Brotherhood (MB)…the Brotherhood broadly embraces electoral politics, but without eschewing the use of violence in some circumstances, notably against those whom it defines as invaders in Iraq and Palestine.”

Posted on 18 Jan 12 by Creeping Sharia

Study Shows Majority of U.S. Mosques Repositories of Sharia, Jihad, & Muslim Brotherhood Literature and Preachers

More empirical evidence of the jihad and sharia being taught, promoted, and advanced in over 80% of American mosques. This confirms two previous surveys which, after careful analysis, came to the same jarring but unsurprising conclusions. One of the authors of this historic study is my lawyer, David Yerushalmi, leading litigation and sharia expert. Yerushalmi successfully fought, argued and won the $10,000,000 lawsuit filed by Rifqa Bary’s parents’ attorney, free speech opponent, Omar Tarazi. Yerushalmi also successfully filed and won three lawsuits I filed against New York City, Miami, and Detroit for violation of free speech.

Send the survey to your Congresman, Senators, police chiefs, professors, deans, headmasters, principals and local FBI offices.

Is it any wonder that Muslim Brotherhood co-conspirators like AIR, ISNA, MAS, MSA are trying to stop law enforcement from monitoring notorious mosques?

Study Shows U.S. Mosques Repositories of Sharia, Jihad, & Muslim Brotherhood Literature and Preachers

Peer-reviewed study most extensive empirical examination of U.S. mosques to date

December 12, 2011 – New York, New York: A leading international peer-reviewed journal specializing in the empirical study of terrorism has published a study that found that 80% of U.S. mosques provide their worshippers with jihad-style literature promoting the use of violence against non-believers and that the imams in those mosques expressly promote that literature.

The study also found that when a mosque imam or its worshippers were “sharia-adherent,” as measured by certain behaviors in conformity with Islamic law, the mosque was more likely to provide this violent literature and the imam was more likely to promote it.

The abstract for the study summarizes the research findings:

A random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S. was conducted to measure the correlation between Sharia adherence and dogma calling for violence against non-believers. Of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all. Mosques that presented as Sharia adherent were more likely to feature violence-positive texts on site than were their non-Sharia-adherent counterparts. In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts. The leadership at Sharia-adherent mosques was more likely to recommend that a worshipper study violence-positive texts than leadership at non-Sharia-adherent mosques. Fifty-eight percent of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad. The leadership of mosques that featured violence-positive literature was more likely to invite guest imams who were known to promote violent jihad than was the leadership of mosques that did not feature violence-positive literature on mosque premises.  

The study was published in December 2011 by Perspectives on Terrorism, a scholarly international journal of the Terrorism Research Initiative (TRI), a global initiative that seeks to support the international community of terrorism researchers and scholars through the facilitation of collaborative projects and cooperative initiatives.  TRI was established in 2007 by scholars from several disciplines in order to provide the global research community with a common tool than can empower them and extend the impact of each participant’s research activities.

The mosque study had previously been published by the Middle East Quarterly in September 2011, an academic peer-reviewed journal which specializes on Middle East regional issues.  Because of the ground-breaking nature of the study, which brings a rigorous empirical methodology to the question of home-grown jihadists, MEQ granted permission to Perspectives on Terrorism to publish a more extensive analysis of the study’s conception, methodology, and results.

The study’s authors, Professor Mordechai Kedar of Bar Ilan University in Israel and David Yerushalmi, who serves as general counsel to the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., have both published widely on terrorism, Islamic law and its underlying doctrines of jihad and violence against unbelievers.

The study may be accessed here at the Mapping Sharia website.

The study may be accessed here at MEQ.

The study may be accessed here at Perspectives on Terrorism.

Posted on 11 Dec 11 by Atlas Shrugs

Ohio: City council mulls pay raise, promotion for Muslim who chooses mosque over work

Posted on November 30, 2011 by creeping

Fools. via Youngstown News, Youngstown Council mulls pay raise as part of case.

YOUNGSTOWN – City council will consider legislation Wednesday to increase the annual salary of an assistant city prosecutor as part of a settlement reached in a religious- and ethnic- discrimination federal lawsuit filed by the employee.

The ordinance would increase the annual base-pay salary of Basil Ally by $4,000. He would be paid $65,200 a year. Also, he would be named the city’s senior prosecutor if council approves the legislation.

Ally, a Muslim, filed a civil lawsuit in May 2009 against the city, its mayor, law director and city prosecutor, contending he was harassed because of his faith and Middle Eastern descent by co-workers.

Also, Ally’s lawsuit stated he was placed on administrative leave because he attended mosque services on a Friday — something his supervisors agreed to accommodate when he was hired — instead of going to a staff meeting.

A settlement was reached about two weeks ago.

In addition to the pay raise and the new job title, Ally received a $110,000 lump-sum payment to settle the lawsuit. The money will come from Midwest Claims, the city’s insurance company.

The city can’t just increase Ally’s annual salary without council passing legislation to change the city’s master salary ordinance, said Law Director Anthony Farris. That’s why the item is on the agenda for council’s Wednesday meeting, he said.

From our previous post Muslim prosecutor in Ohio charges discrimination:

“Mr. Ally was not discriminated against because of his religion or his religious beliefs,” Guglucello said. “His lawsuit is baseless. Mr. Ally has been accommodated for many, many years by the city to practice his religious beliefs. The city is adamant it does not discriminate against anyone.”

The city accommodated the request to worship on Friday afternoons until the end of 2007, when co-workers complained to city Prosecutor Jay Macejko that Ally “was receiving preferential treatment,” the lawsuit reads.

Now he gets preferential treatment, more money, and a promotion. Litigation jihad is lethal.

Posted on 30 Nov 11 by Creeping Sharia

Obama helped usher sharia law, polygamy to Libya (video)

Posted on October 27, 2011 by creeping

Thanks to Obama and NATO using your tax dollars. h/t Elder of Ziyon

 

Flashback: Obama’s anti-gun, pro-sharia legal adviser guides Libya war policy

And we haven’t fact-checked this but interesting none the less…16 Things Libya Will Never See Again

Posted on 27 Oct 11 by creeping sharia