Terrorist supporters at CAIR are cheering the Army’s submission to Islam

Posted: December 27, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam |

But the American public is angry that the Obama Regime forced the Army to cave to Muslim pressure group CAIR’s demands that Muslim students be allowed to wear their headbags when in JROTC uniform, which essentially spits on the concept of ‘uniform.’

Women soldiers in Afghanistan already are forced to wear headbags when they come in contact with Muslim men, putting them in unnecessary danger

Jed Babbin, a former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, noted that the point of a uniform is uniformity. “Look at the word: ‘uni’-’form’ — everybody wears the same thing,” Babbin said. “The military is by its own nature diverse and creates a culture in which everyone, regardless of their race or creed, is blended into one force for a common purpose. This [uniform exemption] divides it, balkanizes it on religious grounds… the point of JROTC is to get you ready for ROTC in college which is preparing you to go on active duty. So if you are going to allow it for ROTC? Why don’t you allow it on active duty?” (Give them time, that’s CAIR’s next move. But the real question should be why are we allowing Muslims into our military in the first place?)

Posted on 27 Dec 11 by BNI

Judge OKs ‘flag of Islam on American soil’ Decision approves government funding for Shariah indoctrination

Posted: January 19, 2011

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND

Attorneys for a Marine Corps veteran of the Iraq War say they have filed a petition to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after a federal district judge ruled it is OK for the U.S. government to fund commercial enterprises that promote the indoctrination of Islamic law, or Shariah, in the United States.

The decision came from Judge Lawrence Zatkoff, who changed his perspective on the issue and said just last week that he would dismiss a constitutional challenge brought by Kevin Murray against the U.S. government’s bailout of AIG, the insurance giant.

AIG used more than “$100 million in federal tax money to support Islamic religious indoctrination through the funding and promotion of Shariah-compliant financing. … SCF is financing that follows the dictates of Islamic law,” said the Thomas More Law Center, or TMLC.

TMLC is representing Murray in his challenge to the use of federal tax money to promote Islam in the U.S.

The non-profit legal advocacy group’s president, Richard Thompson, warned of the precedent.

“Judge Zatkoff’s ruling allows for oil-rich Muslim countries to plant the flag of Islam on American soil,” he said. “His ruling ignored the uncontested opinions of several Shariah experts and AIG’s own website, which trumpeted Shariah-compliant financing as promoting the law of the prophet Mohammed and as an ethical product and a new way of life.”

TMLC and co-counsel David Yerushalmi immediately filed a notice of appeal to the 6th Circuit.

“[Zatkoff’s] ruling ignored AIG’s use of a foreign Islamic advisory board to control investing in accordance with Islamic law,” Thompson continued. “This astonishing decision allows the federal government as well as AIG and other Wall Street bankers to explicitly promote Shariah law – the 1,200-year-old body of Islamic canon law based on the Quran, which demands the destruction of Western civilization and the United States.”

Thompson warned it is the same law “championed by Osama bin Laden and the Taliban; it is the same law that prompted the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks; and it is the same law that is responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians throughout the world. The law center will do everything it can to stop Shariah law from rearing its ugly head in America.”

The lawsuit, Murray v. Geithner et al., was brought because Murray, as a taxpayer, alleges he is being forced to contribute to the propagation of Islamic beliefs and practices predicated upon Islamic law, which he says is hostile to his Christian religion.

Among those who submitted statements in the case were two noted experts in Islamic law and terrorism, Stephen C. Coughlin and Robert Spencer.

Coughlin, a lawyer and decorated Army Reserve officer, is a leading Pentagon expert on the link between Islamic law and jihad. He explained that by engaging in Shariah-compliant financing, AIG and the federal government – which owns 79.9 percent of AIG – are engaging in the religious practice of Islam.

Islam teaches hostility and discrimination against Jews, Christians and anyone who doesn’t accept the Quran as the “word of Allah,” he said, explaining that the indoctrination stems from the same law that motivated the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans.

As WND reported, Spencer, director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, has studied Islamic theology and history for 30 years. He is author of “Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs,” “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades” and eight other books on Islam. He has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the U.S. Central Command, the U.S. Command and General Staff College, the Joint Terrorism Task Force and the U.S. intelligence community.

Spencer explained that by offering Shariah-compliant financing, AIG is promoting religious behavior that teaches hatred and discrimination against Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims.

TMLC said it is challenging the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 that allows $70 billion in taxpayer money to fund and financially support the federal government’s majority ownership interest in AIG, which is considered the market leader in SCF.

The company uses its assets to subject certain financial activities to the dictates of Islam.

“In this case, the United States government has a majority interest in AIG. AIG utilizes consolidated financing whereby all funds flow through a single port to support all of its activities, including Shariah-compliant financing,” TMLC explained.

“Pursuant to the EESA, the government has injected AIG with tens of billions of dollars, without restricting or tracking how this considerable sum of money is spent. At least two of AIG’s subsidiary companies practice Shariah-compliant financing, one of which was unveiled after the influx of government cash. … Finally, after the government acquired a majority interest in AIG and contributed substantial funds to AIG for operational purposes, the government co-sponsored a forum entitled ‘Islamic Finance 101.’

“These facts, taken together, raise a question of whether the government’s involvement with AIG has created the effect of promoting religion and sufficiently raise plaintiff’s claim beyond the speculative level,” TMLC said.

During the discovery portion of the case, TMLC said it obtained “thousands” of documents supporting its claim.

“The circumstances of this case are historic, and the pressure upon the government to navigate this financial crisis is unfathomable. Times of crisis, however, do not justify departure from the Constitution,” the organization said.
posted 9 Jan 11 by WND.com

Halal KFC in Texas

Posted on November 18, 2011 by creeping

via Twitter

@IANTmasjid IANTZabiha Halal KFC – Kentucky Fried Chicken now close to masjid…hmm “finger lickin good” 1776 E Beltline,… fb.me/1gPni2BQ4November 10, 2011 10:14 PM via FacebookReplyRetweetFavorite

Posted by the same mosque in Texas that days ago hosted and asked the FBI to enforce “hate crime” (aka sharia blasphemy) laws against non-Muslims. They also hosted an unindicted co-conspirator to the 1993 WTC bombing.

Halal KFC, it’s da bomb!!

Posted on 18 Nov 11 by Creeping Sharia

Will Shari’a-compliant APPLE remove its Jew-baiting application for iPhone?

Posted: September 18, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam

APPLE iPhone was quick to reject the ‘iSLAM MUHAMMAD’ app because it quoted disturbing passages from the Qur’an which Apple says would offend a large segment of the population – Muslims. But will it remove an app already being sold called ‘A JEW OR NOT A JEW?’

MSNBC  (H/T Susan K) A French anti-racism group has threatened to sue Apple over an iPhone application called “A Jew or Not a Jew?” that allows users to consult a database of celebrities and public figures to determine whether they are Jewish or not.

SOS Racisme said the application, sold for $1.07 on the Apple Store France, violates France’s strict

Islamic iPHONE

laws banning the compiling of people’s personal details without their consent. Under the French penal code, stocking personal details including race, sexuality, political leanings or religious affiliation is punishable by five-year prison sentences and fines of up to $411,870.

Such laws were enacted in the decades following the Holocaust, which saw some 76,000 Jews deported from Nazi-occupied France to concentration camps. Fewer than 3,000 returned alive.

In a statement, SOS Racisme called on Apple to remove the app the from its online store and be more vigilant about the applications it sells.

Apple France and its European headquarters did not immediately return several calls for comment.

A phone call from the creator of the iSLAM MUHAMMAD app to Apple asking them to explain why they rejected his application:

Posted on 18 Sep 11 by BNI

welcome to sharia tube

posted on 19 Aug 11 by Acts17Apologetics (a youtube channel)

Sharia Law and Polygamy in America

The column below (highlights added) by Andrew Bostom zeroes in on one aspect of the threat of sharia to the West: Islamic polygamy. An NPR article in 2008 cited sources estimating that as many as 100,000 Muslims live in polygamous families in the U.S.

Note that the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America has issued fatwas sanctioning polygamy, in keeping with sharia law. One ruling declares American law prohibiting polygamy “against Islamic law.”

---

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2011/07/21/australia-sharia-sanctioned-polygamy-and-child-marriage/

Australia: Sharia-Sanctioned Polygamy and Child Marriage
Posted By Andrew Bostom On July 21, 2011

^[1]

Despite an overall apologetic tone borne of transparent obeisance to cultural relativism, two legal academics, Dr Ann Black and Dr Kerrie Sadiq from The University of Queensland TC Beirne School of Law are “suggesting ^[2]” in their research publication, “Good & Bad Sharia: Australia’s mixed response to Islamic Law” (due to be published in the University of New South Wales Law Journal on Monday July 25, 2011) that,

Australia is right to act with caution in dealing with Sharia law.

Why are even these obviously ^[2] devout votaries of the academic social religion of cultural relativism concerned about the practice of Sharia in Australia at all, or what they term, with revealing euphemism, “legal pluralism?”

One reason was extracted from the forthcoming paper of Drs. Black and Sadiq, and cited by The Australian’s legal affairs editor, Chris Merrit ^[3]:

Valid Muslim polygynist marriages, lawfully entered into overseas, are recognized, with second and third wives and their children able to claim welfare and other benefits.

Merrit’s background article on Black and Sadiq’s findings also noted ^[3] how this practice of Muslim polygamy in Australia involved “marriages where one party is under the lawful marriage age.” And Merrit provided this additional context ^[3]:

The findings come soon after Ikebal Patel, president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, triggered a backlash inside the Islamic community when he called for Australia to compromise with Islam and embrace legal pluralism …The latest research has found that while polygamy is unlawful, mainstream law accommodates men who arrive in Australia with multiple wives and gives some legal standing to multiple partnerships that originate in Australia.

More alarming “context” not addressed by the report of Drs. Black and Sadiq, and in fact dismissed by Dr. Black ^[2] in these words, “The ‘foreignness’ of Sharia law is increased by media reports which highlight ‘differences’ and feed into fears about the Muslim presence in Australia,” was provided by The Australian Daily Telegraph ^[4]:

On Sunday, a recent convert to Islam in Sydney was allegedly lashed 40 times with electrical cable by men from his mosque, in a terrifying home invasion, as punishment for drinking alcohol – forbidden under Shariah law. Two people have been arrested in connection with the attack.

The staid report by two Australian cultural relativist academics should (but won’t) make our mainstream media talking heads curious about how mainstream Islamic opinion views polygamy in the United States. For example, what have the esteemed mainstream Islamic clerics of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA) opined regarding polygamy? The AMJA ^[5] mission statement maintains:

[The AMJA was] founded to provide guidance for Muslims living in North America. … AMJA is a religious organization that does not exploit religion to achieve any political ends, but instead provides practical solutions within the guidelines of Islam and the nation’s laws to the various challenges experienced by Muslim communities.

A report in The Muslim Observer ^[6] published October 21, 2010, highlighting AMJA’s “seventh annual American conference of imams,” confirms that the organization is accepted ^[6] as such by the mainstream American Muslim community. AMJA and its recent “training” conference for American imams were described ^[6] in these banal terms:

The organization AMJA (Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America) has a list of scholars associated with it which stretches from Al-Azhar University to Virginia’s Open University, and back across the ocean to the professors at Saudi universities. Its website, amjaonline.com, provides fatawa on many issues and promises 24-hour access to scholars who can give legal opinions on the issues people face. AMJA focuses on providing fatwas to Americans, and believes it is able to provide culturally appropriate fatwas although many of their scholars are not American–because they have some American scholars and because of the technological ties that bind AMJA’s American scholars with those abroad. AMJA just had, in Houston, its seventh annual American conference of imams, and two local Michigan imams attended, namely Imam Musa of Bloomfield’s Muslim Unity Center, and Imam Ali of MCWS. Mr. Sadiqul Hassan of AMJA explained that “the event was the 7th annual imam workshop.” Mr. Hassan said that AMJA is “a fiqh council basically,” with “scholars who live abroad and inside the U.S.; we have experts in different fields to educate about life in the U.S. — fatwa are based on life in the U.S.”

Not only does AMJA extol polygamy in accordance with the Sharia, AMJA endorses its extra-legal (i.e., vis a vis US law) application here in America, as can be readily gleaned from these two “fatwas” or Islamic legal rulings:

Fatwa 2134[7] Dr. Main Khalid Al-Qudah Date 2006-10-27

>Polygamy in Islam is permissible for different reasons, like:
1- The sexual energy of men is more than that of women in general. So, in some cases, one wife is not enough to fulfill the conjugal desire of her husband
2- Pregnancy and delivery negatively affect the shape and physical attraction that women have.
3- Worldwide, the percentage of females is always more than that of males, eventually, there must be a solution, either to permit adultery and prostitution, or to allow polygamy
4- One husband could take care of more than one wife at the same time; socially, financially, and even sexually as I mentioned above. However, the opposite is not right because of the physical and psychological capability that Allah the all mighty gave men.

Fatwa 3370[8] Scholar Dr. Hatem al-Haj Date 2007-08-08

Comment from Muslim questioner: We know that polygamy is against USA law. But I heard from my friend that as long as you don`t register your marriage to the registrar, it is okay to have more than one wife here in the states, i.e., all the wives are living here. The argument that he made was that the law that prohibits marrying more than one is against the shaariah so, it is okay for us to break it…There are some scholars in the USA are practicing polygamy without the knowledge of the authorities using that argument….

Dr. Hatem al-Haj’s response: Polygamy is halal in Islam and may be highly recommended when the number of females is bigger than that of males to afford all females a decent life that suffices their physiologic, emotional and other needs. The US law about polygamy is against the Islamic law, for no one can make prohibited that which Allah specifically made allowable.

The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website.

[UPDATED!] LITIGATION JIHAD: Hire a Muslim woman ONLY if you enjoy getting sued

Posted: July 13, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam | Filed under: Islam in America | 13 Comments »

MUSLIM woman sues Duane Reade after she was fired when she showed up for work one day wearing a headbag. Of course, these Muslim bitches never come in for an interview wearing a headbag, only after they are employed for a while. Then they sue you if you don’t like it.

(These kinds of stories are nearing epidemic proportions, and the instigator behind all these fraudulent lawsuits is Terrorist Front Group CAIR)

NY POST – A former Duane Reade employee on Long Island says she was fired when she started wearing a hijab, a traditional Muslim head covering, a lawsuit charges.

Hira Iqbal, 21, claims that boss Errol Smith told her store policy “does not allow people like that” to wear such clothes at work, claims the federal First Amendment lawsuit, filed in Central Islip. A spokesperson for Duane Reade said Iqbal quit and was not fired.

UPDATE: As if you didn’t have enough reasons not to hire muslims, here are 13 more.

Planks Constant (H/T Gerald)

1. Muslim Dunkin Donuts – No Pork on my Fork we read about a Palestinian Arab who sued Dunkin’ Donuts for discrimination against him based on his race by making the sale of breakfast sandwiches with bacon, ham or sausage a mandatory part of his franchise agreement. This is why Muslims cannot assimilate. They seek work for which they are not at all suited, rather they demand that the enterprise suit them.

2. Illegal immigrant Muslim FBI/CIA agent accused of passing info to Hizballah worked in Iraq questioning Al-Qaeda detainees.  It just keeps getting worse: the Keystone Kops idiocy of the FBI and CIA in hiring this woman and employing her in sensitive work is a manifestation of both agencies’ abysmal failure to address the ideological dimension of this conflict. They hardly know what a jihad is, much less know how to question a potential employee to determine her allegiance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism. On Tuesday, she pleaded guilty to conspiracy to illegally search FBI computers for classified information about Hezbollah and to naturalization fraud.

3. You’re standing at the checkout counter at Target; you unload you groceries, milk, bread, bacon, some fruit. The cashier, wearing a Hijab stops at the bacon and calls for help. You wait a few minutes for another worker to come by and help ring up the bacon and put it into a shopping bag. You ask if the cashier is Muslim – she says yes. If this were the Twilight Zone you would understand that you are in a world where up is down and left is right. Why would a Muslim work in a place where she is forbidden to handle pork, alcohol, or other filthy infidel products? Welcome to a Target store in Minnesota.

4. Your flight just landed and you exit the airport heading for a taxi. You are carrying a few bags of gifts from the duty free shop. The cabbie, a Muslim, refuses to take you because he suspects you may be carrying alcohol. The rest of the cabbies are Somali Muslims. What do you do? If you want to get home you’ll have to ditch the booze. That’s what happens to an airport that allows Muslims to be taxi drivers.

5. In Australia, where 2,000 of the 10,000 cabbies are Muslim, comes the story of Muslim taxi drivers refusing to carry blind passengers with their guide dogs because they consider dogs haaram despite the legal requirement for taxi drivers, shops, restaurants, hotels and supermarkets to accept guide dogs.

6. Are Minneapolis Taxi Fares Going To Support Al-Qaeda? In many cases American hospitality has been repaid with a refusal by the Somalis to integrate into the larger society that hosts them, bringing lawsuits and allying themselves with radical Islamist organizations. In fact many Somali Americans seem be intent on reproducing nothing more than “little Mogadishus” wherever they have been resettled. The track record of America’s Somali refugees so far suggests that these people are largely unappreciative of the stunning commitment which has been made to them by the people of the United States.

7. A female Muslim sued a Hair Salon operator for hurt feelings because she wasn’t hired as a hair stylist and was awarded £4,000 in compensation. Why she wasn’t hired? She wouldn’t remove her headscarf and show her hair while working [Radarsite: Muslim job applicant: Hire me or else —]. I suppose Muslim women can now apply for jobs as pilates instructors and refuse to work in anything but a full Hijab and anyone who refuses to hire her will be sued.

8. Electrolux settled a complaint with (who else) the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over an allegation that it failed to allow prayer times for its Muslim employees. The Somali Community Center in Minneapolis had filed the complaint on behalf of 165 workers at Electrolux Home Products in St. Cloud , Minn. Under the settlement, Electrolux agreed to allow the workers time for sunset prayer, provide a Somali translator on occasions when policies or procedures are discussed, give managers and supervisors diversity training, and donate money to a local Islamic center.

9. Two women in Dearborn, Mich., have filed suit after they say a local McDonald’s manager refused them jobs because they wear traditional Islamic dress. “He simply (told me) I had to make a choice and remove my hijab, or I would not be able to establish employment there,” Quiana Pugh said. [DRUDGE Retort] Now why would a Muslim woman want a job when she knows she will be asked to handle a bacon, egg and cheese on occasion? Oh  yeah, L-A-W-S-U-I-T!

10. A Muslim said he is suing Tesco for religious discrimination because he was asked to handle crates of alcohol in a warehouse. Mohammed Ahmed, 32, was employed at the supermarket giant’s Lichfield depot in September last year for a job that included transporting various goods on fork-lift trucks [ifeminists.com].

11. ALCOHOL PRIZE OFFER AMOUNTS TO RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION? – Imran Khan, 25, claimed that the bottles of wine on offer put him at a disadvantage because, as a Muslim, he could not drink alcohol and was therefore unable to claim the prizes. British-born Mr Khan, who works for Direct Line Insurance, is seeking damages for “hurt feelings” under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. Mr Khan’s team leader, Louise Cummings, said she introduced the incentives as a means of “improving staff morale and performance”. “If I had realized that I had hurt anyone’s feelings, then I would have taken steps to rectify that immediately,” she added. Tariq Sadiq, for the company, said that another Muslim worker, who had won an alcoholic prize in a similar scheme, had “simply” exchanged it for an alternative.

12. Muslim sues Met after being told to fry bacon – A Muslim chef is suing the Met police after being asked to cook pork sausages and bacon for breakfast. Hasanali Khoja is accusing the force of religious discrimination after it refused to guarantee that he would not have to handle pork.

13. From the comment section of Jihad Watch, “I have a friend who works in the government run public trustees office…they have had an influx of Muslim employees over the past 5 years…2 years ago there was a notice circulated that employees were no longer allowed to have decorations on their desks or in the workplace such as Christmas or Easter items as this was inflammatory to those employees that were not Christian and did not celebrate those holidays. They were allowed to have “happy holidays” decorations that did not depict any religious or Christmas content. The Muslim employees were provided an area of the office (which was in view of the employees) to pray several times a day along with a person who led prayers out loud…Muslims did not have to be subjected to Christmas decorations once a year but the employees had to be subjected to muslim prayer daily during the work day. CAIR wants a workplace free of religious discrimination…so much for that.”

RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:

american-businesses-hire-a-muslim-and-youre-likely-to-get-sued

it-serves-abercrombie-fitch-right-for-hiring-muslims-they-have-been-sued-by-them-at-least-twice-before

more-legal-jihad-muslim-teen-fired-from-popular-apparel-chain-for-wearing-a-bag-on-her-head

muslim-woman-in-hijab-walks-into-abercrombie-fitch-and-applies-for-a-job

america-gives-back-backlash-against-muslims-who-are-trying-to-make-the-workplace-sharia-compliant

u-s-muslims-complain-that-muslim-women-who-wear-bags-on-their-heads-are-being-discriminated-against-in-the-workplace

legal-jihad-not-hiring-muslim-bagheads-isnt-discrimination-its-called-a-dress-code

legal-jihad-gone-bad-nudie-pix-come-back-to-bite-muslim-woman-in-the-ass

legal-jihad-another-good-reason-for-never-ever-hiring-muslim-employees

how-many-more-reasons-do-people-need-for-not-hiring-muslims

cair-demands-air-france-apologize-for-sending-home-a-muslim-employee-who-refused-to-take-the-bag-off-her-head

muslims-demand-special-religious-accommodations-from-electrolux-for-ramadan

legal-jihad-muslim-airline-worker-sues-firm-because-other-employees-called-him-names

legal-jihad-not-hiring-muslim-bagheads-isnt-discrimination-its-called-a-dress-code

legal-jihad-muslim-woman-sues-nj-hospital-for-not-catering-to-her-religious-demands

listen-up-muslims-we-are-not-afraid-of-you

more-legal-jihad-from-terrorist-front-group-cair

u-s-muslims-complain-that-muslim-women-who-wear-bags-on-their-heads-are-being-discriminated-against-in-the-workplace

legal-jihad-muslim-woman-makes-a-federal-case-out-of-headscarf-ban-in-the-courts

sudden-jihad-syndrome-cover-up

somali-muslim-woman-we-will-fight-them-and-eat-their-flesh

all-americans-must-die-love-somali-muslims-tysons-plant-tennessee

tennessee-hitler-loving-jew-hating-somali-muslim-cab-driver-tries-to-kill-passengers

minnesotastan-santa-banned-from-head-start-classes-for-being-offensive-to-muslims

swift-meat-packing-plant-executives-cave-in-to-muslim-demands-for-ramadan-this-year

somali-muslims-importing-third-world-culture-at-u-s-taxpayer-expense

somali-muslim-immigrants-turning-american-small-towns-into-islamic-welfare-enclaves

terrorist-front-group-cair-demands-investigation-of-trouble-with-somali-muslim-immigrants-in-minnesota-schools

warning-get-into-a-taxi-with-a-somali-muslim-driver-at-your-own-risk

muslims-behaving-badly-in-america

minnesotastan-from-those-wonderful-folks-who-gave-us-the-flying-imams-and-the-first-terrorist-sympathizing-muslim-member-of-the-house-of-representatives

another-good-reason-not-to-employ-muslims

separation-of-mosque-and-state-not-in-minnesotastan

somali-muslims-get-out-of-my-country